The Pursuit Of Medical Knowledge Analysis

Improved Essays
In the article The pursuit of medical knowledge and the potential consequences of the hidden curriculum by Barret Michaelec first year and second year preclinical medical students were interviewed in order to help determine how their pursuit for medical knowledge affected their perceptions and interactions with the world outside of medical school. The students commonly reported that their submergence in medicine affected their communication with others, relationships, and how they perceived their external lives.
This struggle the students encounter ties directly into Mary Shelly’s, Frankenstein, in a sense that both the alumni and Victor Frankenstein’s pursuit for knowledge presents them with unaccounted for difficulties. For the med students “their pursuit of medical knowledge, and the grueling nature of that pursuit, keeps them at a social, emotional, and even intellectual distance from those outside of medicine” (Michaelec 10). The same can be said for Victor Frankenstein, his pursuit for knowledge detached him from his sanity, his friends and family, and others who did not attribute his intelligence.
The students mentioned how their preclinical training minimized their social network. Generally all med students take the same courses and training so naturally they spend more time with other medical students oppose to those who are not. All of their time is invested in their educational careers that even when they do find the time to be with non-med friends they have a hard time finding a topic, not related to medicine, that they can converse about. As one student states, “ You know, you’re around this stuff all the time. It’s what you talk about when you’re in class, out of class, on the weekends, you make jokes about it. So that sort of thing puts up a wall between you and the people in your life who aren’t in medicine.” The communication gap exists not only with their outside friends but also with their families and patients. Much like their non-med friends, their families are not acquainted with subjects the students are studying so conversation can be limiting. However, the fact that it’s family does not make it as complicated as with other people. Students did feel, to some extent, that they can’t relate as much as they used to with family, friends, and even when meeting new people. Similarly when med students were in clinics shadowing or assisting doctors they found it difficult to connect with patients due to the fact that most lay people do not have the same medical knowledge the students do. Additionally, med students mentioned that in medical school they are drilled with the idea that their level of intellect and social status is superior above others. For instance
…show more content…
Statistical evidence could not be possible in this study due to the fact that it was conducted only in one medical school and only 10 students were interviewed. The students could have potentially had a selection bias since they were chosen at will oppose to at random. The argument could have been supported with more credible evidence to portray a stronger point. Additionally, the article did not provide an opposing side. There is no clear rebuttal that would state alternative sources of the communication-gap and knowledge gap experienced by the medical

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    English philosopher John Locke once said, “We are like chameleons, we take our hue and the color of our moral character, from those who are around us.” In Dr. Rachel Pearson’s case, this quote is undeniably true. In her decorous memoir, No Apparent Distress: A Doctor’s Coming-of-Age on the Front Lines of American Medicine, Pearson gives a detailed description of her harrowing journey as a medical student, and the people that she encounters and forms relationships with on this journey- her family, patients, and peers- heavily contribute to her identity as a doctor and her overall identity as a human being. Similar to the people in her life, her education, albeit very flawed, is vital in molding her into the doctor she is.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Anne Fadiman rightly asserts in her novel The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down: A Hmong Child, Her American Doctors, and the Collision of Two Cultures that the tragedy of Lia Lee, a Hmong bounded epileptic child of Laos natives, was a result of cross-cultural misunderstanding; I feel that she does not sufficiently explore the role of language and translation serving as factors of psychosocial and cultural aspects of medical diagnosis and the overall confrontation of foreign patients with the American medical system. As described by Janelle S. Taylor, culture is the process of making meaning and social interactions. The embodiment of cross-cultural meaning can be articulated through the intertwining of language, the duality of vocal…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vampires. Myth. Symbolism. These devices and ideas discussed in Thomas C. Foster’s, How to Read Literature Like A Professor, infiltrate literature of all forms back from the eighteenth century until modern day, by adding layers and layers of depth and density to a novel, consequently creating a long lasting resonance in our ever changing society. All readers have to do is simply look, ponder, and analyze.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Foils are characters who contrast the protagonist’s traits in order to emphasize them. In many cases there is more than one foil to a character. Frankenstein, Or, The Modern Prometheus by Mary Shelley provides an example of multiple foil characters. Elizabeth Lavenza, Robert Walton and Henry Clerval each counteract the main character, Victor Frankenstein. The most effective foil, however, is the creature Victor brings to life.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite being separated by their respective contextual influences, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (1818) and Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner (Director’s cut) both highlight humanity’s ambition and desire to overstep natural boundaries as an enduring aspect of humanity. The question of human identity is put forward by both texts, and through the study of the respective Romanian and Postmodern contexts, the values of human nature can be identified. Frankenstein cautions against humanity’s ambition and desire to bypass natural boundaries through addressing the experimentation on dead bodies by scientists such as Galvani and Aldini. Mirroring these scientists of Shelley’s time, Victor is presented as a rash individual in being ”deeply smitten with the…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Monstrosity of Knowledge, Power, and Nature Ignorance serves as a wall separating a life of bliss from one of tragedy and pain. Choosing enlightenment darkens one’s future, especially when such information violates natural law. In her novel Frankenstein, Mary Shelley asserts the dominance of nature as the corruptive effects of extensive knowledge and impulsive exertion of power hinder Victor Frankenstein and the Monster in their respective pursuits of happiness. Curiosity-fueled knowledge gives Frankenstein and the Monster the unwarranted power to defy natural processes. When Frankenstein attains mastery of generation, his reckless superiority foreshadows his misfortune.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Health Care Professional’s Effect on the Psychological Health of a Trauma Patient “It is much more important to know what sort of a patient has a disease than what sort of a disease a patient has.” – Sir William Osler. This quote alludes to the idea the knowing your patient is as important that treating the disease alone. Is it possible that the positive or negative communication and attitudes of nurses, doctors, and surgeons given charge over a patient, alter the prognosis of that patient’s health? And if so, is the difference in patient outcome large enough to make the medical community change the amount of education in psychology that medical students receive.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In watching his family suffer immensely, Victor realizes the pure evil that has been caused by his creature’s actions, but also finds fault within himself. The title of Frankenstein not only symbolizes the loneliness and frustration that Victor feels during his lifetime, but also the creature’s alienation from society, all resulting from the obsessive pursuit of knowledge. The struggles of both Victor and his creation demonstrate the importance of knowledge along with the ramifications or benefits it may bring in certain…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shelley viewed the exponential growth of science as a danger to society. To her view science would isolate the humanity from the individual. This is represented in Frankenstein who isolates his humanity to achieve greatness. If an individual is not prepared to control himself with an overwhelming amount of knowledge they are in danger of losing their will, or even their sanity, which occurred to Frankenstein. Frankenstein states this in the book, “Increase of the old knowledge only discovered to me more clearly what a wretched outcast I was.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The challenges for Victor Frankenstein would be the loss of his loved ones at the hands of the monster that he created, the deeper reason after reaching the destination is that the thirst for knowledge can be destructive. Chapter six of How to Read Literature like a Professor revolves around the idea that many pieces of literature are related to the Bible. The relationship to the Bible is not left to classic…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Knowledge can be very dangerous because it can lead to isolation from others, it can harm his loved ones and the public and it can cost your life. When Victor Frankenstein turns to his teenage years, he is interested in the natural world. Victor’s heroes were Cornelius Agrippa,…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Knowledge In Frankenstein

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Mary Shelley’s gothic novel Frankenstein develops and explores its protagonist, Victor Frankenstein, in his relentless search for knowledge, quarrel with his own creation, and his turn-around of pursuit. Through the perspective of Robert Walton, an explorer who intended to become the first to reach the North Pole, the reader gets to witness his encounter with Victor Frankenstein up to his tragic fate. It is at their encounter that Victor cautions Walton to not let his ambition and knowledge, in this case his voyage to the North Pole, to negatively turn for the worse for Walton as it did for Victor himself. At first glance, the reader may assume that the cause of Victor’s suffering is owed solely to his search of knowledge; however upon observation…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When Victor attends University of Ingolstadt, he completely isolates himself from society and his loving family, who begged him to stay connected. Victor Frankenstein is motivated by pride and scientific curiosity, but his misguided ambitions lead to the formation of a monster. Victor Frankenstein becomes so enthralled in his work that it appears he has an unhealthy obsession with the pursuit of knowledge, and this curiosity persuades him in an attempt to recreate human life. He selfishly isolates himself, “while [he pursued [his] undertaking with unremitting ardour” (Shelley 32). Victor is incredibly naive and irresponsible to believe that his experiment will not yield any negative repercussions.…

    • 1872 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mary Shelley, author of Frankenstein, expresses the idea that blind scientific ambition and progress is dangerous because of the loss of morals and dire consequences. The two main characters, Victor Frankenstein and Walton, both view scientific advancement as glorification. They both take risks for the recondition they believe they deserve but along the way morals are lost. These two scientist go above and beyond for their study, almost converting their once moral reason to immoral.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Education is a large concept discussed within Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein; or the Modern Prometheus. However, education within the novel is not discussed in a contemporary sense, insead using it to convey the concepts of irregular education, scientific discovery, and the importance of learning about one self. Throughout Frankenstein education is discussed in a variety of sense mainly in the forms of differing self learning and the use of self-learning to propel yourself forward. Self-learning is prevalent within the majority of the novel from the prefaces explorative and naval readings of Robert Walton, the learning of the Frankenstein family and the varying degrees of impact education has on the children especially Victor Frankenstein,…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays