To ban a book would be the same as to cut the tongue of a man or woman and if one were to not to be able to speak their mind what then is the purpose of communication? There would be no purpose, because taking away a writer’s voice is the same as pepper spraying protesters fighting for their rights. Banning books is at most insulting the purpose of communication for if our words are thrown away then we lose a piece of communication. I once wrote a story about what I thought life meant, for my senior class and received a bad grade. The teacher wrote a note on the paper saying I was wrong and that I should try restate my opinion. How is one’s idea communicated or shared wrongly? I will probably never know and will continue to believe she was a bitch. My point though is that sometimes we share or communicate ideas to the wrong audience and captivating the audience is one of the most crucial areas in the purpose of
To ban a book would be the same as to cut the tongue of a man or woman and if one were to not to be able to speak their mind what then is the purpose of communication? There would be no purpose, because taking away a writer’s voice is the same as pepper spraying protesters fighting for their rights. Banning books is at most insulting the purpose of communication for if our words are thrown away then we lose a piece of communication. I once wrote a story about what I thought life meant, for my senior class and received a bad grade. The teacher wrote a note on the paper saying I was wrong and that I should try restate my opinion. How is one’s idea communicated or shared wrongly? I will probably never know and will continue to believe she was a bitch. My point though is that sometimes we share or communicate ideas to the wrong audience and captivating the audience is one of the most crucial areas in the purpose of