The Pros And Cons Of Therapeutic Cloning

Improved Essays
“More than 123,000 people are waiting for organ transplants. Some won’t receive a transplant in time, some suffer through years of pain and medical care before finally receiving the transplant they need, and others are rejected the opportunity of a transplant because they don’t meet the criteria. The average waiting time for a heart transplant is 4 years, a kidney transplant 5 years, and a liver transplant 11 years,” (Life Donor Program). Although theologians, politicians, preachers, and the medical community wrestle with the ethical ramifications of therapeutic cloning, the medical benefits outweigh the ethical concerns. Due to the research and technology today, scientists have learned that they are able to take stem cells from a patient and grow organs and tissue that are explicit to their own DNA so there’s no risk of rejection. Therapeutic cloning also has the potential to cure illnesses that as of now have no cure and take the lives of hundreds of thousands every year. Scientists are able to get stem cells without harming babies, …show more content…
Scientists then electrocute the egg which starts the process of embryo making. This embryo develops to create stem cells which are then harvested, ending the embryos development (see fig. 1). These stem cells then have the potential to be developed into any tissue or organ needed,” (Murnaghan). Because of this, patients are able to receive transplants that are specific to their DNA. This prevents the issue of rejection and solving the problem of shortages. All patients will be able to receive the transplant that they are in need of more quickly and won't be denied of care because they don’t meet the criteria to obtain a donor transplant. Therapeutic cloning will be quicker and more efficient than donor transplants, helping hundreds of thousands of patients all around the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    All great leaps in our society have first met with some moral conflict. Scientists today are facing the use of embryonic stems cells and if their use takes away a human life. It has been proven this small group of specialized cells can treat many diseases that we have battled for some time. In the case of the embryonic stem cell research, it is almost impossible to respect both moral principles of respecting the value of a human life and to prevent or alleviate suffering. These two principles are what have created the debate on embryonic stem cell research and use.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that still is not enough to know for sure whether the outcome outweighs the risk. I think that once we get more information on cloning and practice perhaps on someone who is near death and is donating their body to…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Embryonic Stem Cell Research: The Okay Way to Kill a Baby Today, society’s ethics have gone almost completely away. Society justifies that one life lost is okay to lose if it ends up saving thousands. Embryonic stem cell research is exactly that justification. Stem cell research is taking one type of cell and trying to coax it into a different type of cell. Embryonic stem cell research is taking an embryo and coaxing it into becoming a differing type of cell and destroying its chances at becoming a baby.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In a two part viewpoint, David A. Prentice and William Saunders discuss the science and ethics of Therapeutic cloning. In the first portion Prentice argues that creating clones for the sole purpose of embryonic stem cell research commonly known as " Therapeutic Cloning," is not very different from reproductive cloning. He also points out that therapeutic cloning is not very therapeutic for the embryo involved. In the second portion of the viewpoint, Saunders elaborates on Prentice's arguments and goes more in depth. Saunders goes as far as to point out that therapeutic cloning is barely any different than the horrific experiment practiced by the Nazis during the time of World War II.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Unlike reproductive cloning, therapeutic cloning does not involve creating full copies of organisms. Instead, it involves taking stem cells from an embryo and using them to make an entire organ that could replace the organ of a patient, rather than needing to find someone to donate an organ. However, religious activists have been consistently opposed to stem cell research and therapeutic cloning because the human embryo is destroyed after its stem cells are removed (Jensen 2). It is an interesting predicament where killing a life that is not fully developed can help save a person who is in need of an organ transplant. Personally, I believe that therapeutic cloning and the use of stem cells is ethical because it is used to help save a person’s life, whether by creating an organ that the person needs or by curing genetic diseases such as Parkinson’s that have so far been…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Human Cloning

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited

    Cloning is a sin in front of god because in the bible it says “So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them “Genesis 1:27. God created people in his own image, and for babies to be created in mother’s womb, in the natural way not in a test tube. Anyone who follows God and believes in the bible should not say cloning is right especially just for organ donation, because nobody should take away the life of another person because only God can take away lives. Men did not create our life but God did so a man should not have any right to take anybody’s life because only the creator can take what he gave ys therefore killing clones for donation purpose is murdering and it should be a crime. If people keep on cloning to save their loved ones or in the memory of them, then the generation is not going anywhere because we are going to keep on cloning the people that were here.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because the field of regenerative medicine is so new, the lack of federal regulation in relation to the harvesting of stem cells research is laden with ethical concerns, particularly regarding the ideas of personhood, human dignity, and justice toward humankind that arise from dealing with human life in one of its earliest forms, the embryo (Brind'Amour). Due to the sporadic and inconsistent nature of these regulations, many institutes avoid research, afraid to participate in the highly controversial research. However, the advent of induced pluripotent cells in regenerative medicine greatly decreases the need for stem cells. This decreased need will, with proper regulation, should eliminate the ethical walls that have dogged the field of regenerative…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Therapeutic cloning could help people get new organs or help repair injuries. For example if someone gets their hand amputated they can clone a new one. The hand would be new and they will have a chance to reattach it. Another example would be if someone needed a kidney transplant, they could…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although many religious and conservation organizations find therapeutic cloning unacceptable and unethical, the process can be very rewarding for curing diseases that are otherwise untreatable. Every ten…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For example, if somebody had a lack of white blood cells, cloning could theoretically build them for their immune system. I can use this encyclopedia article to explain another potential benefit of cloning. This part of my paper would go more into depth about the reach cloning can have on numerous things, and exactly how much it would change life. Farina, Antonio. " Human cloning.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The intern sighed as she threw away, yet again the remains of a manipulated human embryo into the receptacle. As the intern began to clean the petri dish that once held such a small but significant life, she wondered how the rest of the scientists took killing an innocent life so lightly. Stem cell research is beneficial because it helps to further the research towards the cure of diabetes, cancer, other various diseases and illnesses, and the advancement in the growth of such stem cells also helps further the research in organ growth. However, some ways the scientists conduct and carry out stem cell research is neither morally correct nor practical. Stem cell research helps further the advancement in the curing of diseases such as diabetes…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bioethics in Medical Research Through the recent years, there has been a lot of controversy on the topic of medical bioethics. They main topics inside of medical bioethics are cloning and gene therapy. Some people agree with cloning and gene therapy saying that it will make the world better and it will help people and society. On the other hand, some people disagree and say that this is unnatural and will mess up society.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you think a plant, animal, or even a human can be cloned? If so, would you be a support or oppose it? Genetic Cloning has many titles; from human cloning, Reproductive cloning, Therapeutic cloning or even Research cloning. They all mean the same thing, which is the process in which a gene of interest is located and copied out of DNA extracted from an organism. Genetic Cloning has been going on for years, ever since 1981.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although it poses a world of "what-if" possibilities for those that have trouble conceiving or those that seek treatment for genetic diseases that are deemed incurable, the practice of somatic cell nucleus transfer is not ethical. The reasons why consist of many it is morally unethical rely on numerous factors. First and most important fact in my eyes is the creation of life to just destroy that life for research. This therapeutic cloning is legal in some states, but requires the destruction of the embryo after the stem cell harvest. I do not believe anyone should have the power other than God Himself to take a life that does not belong to them.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cloning Persuasive Essay

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The idea of cloning is frightening to many people, but cloning can actually be beneficial to many people. Genetic cloning offers the ability to clone entire organs, and stop virtually all genetic diseases. 8,000 people die annually waiting for an organ. Scientists believe they could be able to use cells from those patients and clone them to make a healthy organ for them. This could get rid of the risk of rejection, because why would your body rejection your own organ?…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays