Us Congress Research Paper

Improved Essays
The US Congress is the national legislative body of government that consists of the Senate and the House of Representative. When people think of the word congress they most likely think of this definition, but congress is so much more. The US Congress is the reason we have all the laws that keep us safe. The word congress means coming together and legislature means making law, which put together congress means coming together to make laws, which is exactly what they do. Congress is a locally elected body of government that makes national policy. Which leads to congressional districts; Congressional district is when a state is divided into districts and each district elects one member to represent the national House of Representatives. According to Richard Fenno, “People run for Congress by running against Congress”. This means that people love the people that they elect to be in congress, but they just do not like the job that congress does. People love their congressman due to the fact that they feel as if they had a say so in congress due to the fact they were the one that voted for the congressman. Also I feel that people love their congressman because he addresses the problems in your district and tells you that he will do his best to get whatever it is you want passed in Congress, but actually getting it passed in Congress seems about impracticable. You can also consider representative and lawmaking as a reason people dislike Congress but like their Congressman. Representative is a person who look out for the interests of those who elect them; I would see as the elected congressman to represent your district, and lawmaking is the creation of policy to address the problems and needs of the entire nation. Take in account that this definition said the whole nation, not just your district. The newest data on American’s approval of Congress shows that only 16% of Americans approve of the job Congress is doing, a number essentially unchanged from the beginning of 2013. At the same time, 46% of Americans approve of the job their individual congressional representative is doing. People like the fact that they choose who they want to represent their district but due to lawmaking what might be important in their district might not be important to the entire nation. I live in Locust Grove, Georgia, which is in the third district of Georgia. Congressman Lynn Westmoreland is the representative for the third district of Georgia, and represents the third district as a republican. …show more content…
As of 2010, Georgia’s third district has been relocated and shrunk. Until 2010 we were the 3rd largest districts out of the whole state and now we are the 8th largest districts out of the 14 districts. Out of the 14 districts we have in Georgia, 10 of them are republican and 4 are Democrat. This seems to be an example partisan gerrymandering. Partisan gerrymandering is redistricting controlled by the majority party in the state’s legislature, to increase the number of districts that a party can expect to carry. I believe this is partisan gerrymandering due to the fact that the third district used to be one of the largest districts, but mostly everyone in the district would vote republican. Which makes me believe they moved the third district to get more republican votes where the third district used to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Gerrymandering Case Study

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Most people believe that the outcome of elections in Texas is decided by the voters, but in our current single-member district system of electing representatives, frequently that is not the case. Often times who will win in an election is decided long before election day, usually by those who draw the district lines. For example, if the districts in texas are drawn to be 65 percent republican then the outcome will most likely result in republicans that have the majority of seats in the legislature. In a single member district system, only one member can be elected to congress for each district, that is why drawing the district lines is by far one of the most important aspects for a party to win seats. The parties assure their representatives…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judge Justice (along with the other judges) found that The Legislative Redistricting Board did not take redistricting seriously, but instead they did what they wanted. Another issue that was brought up in the case was the multimember districts in Dallas and Bexar. Representatives in these districts are elected but minorities seem to be underrepresented. The Legislative Redistricting Board had the lines drawn so there could be political success. The decision that was made brought controversy so this case was brought to the U.S. Supreme Court (White v. Regester) in which they agreed with the court’s decision.…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Partisan Gerrymandering is the process legislators go to though, by either drawing or changing district boundaries, to make sure one political party has an advantage when it comes to the outcome of an election. This takes away the whole point of being a democratic country where people have the freedom to choose their own government, and representation. Because elections are rigged and peoples votes don't count, legislators makeup district boundaries that only benefit them, and most importantly keep a party chosen by them and only them in a secure route to WIN, without caring about what the voters actually want. Making partisan gerrymandering a big threat to democracy because instead of having the people choose, politicians are choosing for them. Since legislators draw the district…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The process of gerrymandering started in 1788, before Congress even existed. Henry drew the fifth congressional district in Virginia to include as many Anti-Federalists as possible. However, Henry didn’t have the resources to prevent Madison, his opponent, from beating him. Today, Henry would have been able to ensure victory because of detailed census results and voter tallies. Political parties use two specific techniques to gerrymander which are “packing” and “cracking” districts.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Reporter Ronald Brownstein argues that there are four quadrants of Congress. Brownstein adheres to the idea that demographic factors that go beyond region play a powerful role in shaping each party’s representation in the House. The four quadrants of Congress, which include districts that have high levels of racial minorities and of educated whites, districts with high minority levels and low levels of white education, districts that have low minority levels and high white education levels, and districts with low minority levels and low white education, shape the impact of demography on parties in the House. The Democrats’ two greatest demographic strengths are the racial minorities and well-educated whites. While the Democrats drawing their…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    From the website given for knowing my district, the district number that I belong is 115 and by looking the map I found my district is gerrymandered. Rinaldi Matt from Republican party represents my district. He works for the betterment of education, protection of life, 2nd amendment rights. He also worked on the project called,…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This may occur to to the addition or loss of representative(s). Each district has to have equal population, must be connected, and must be compact. Politicians may gerrymander to keep an incumbent in power. They change district lines to ensure that the majority of voters in the district will support the incumbent.…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is important to states because they can be able to become more important if they receive more representatives. Define congressional redistricting. Congressional redistricting is when a state has more representatives rather than districts so they redraw the border. Explain two goals of politicians when they gerrymander during redistricting.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A Full Vindication of the Measures of Congress “A full vindication of the measures of Congress” is a letter written by Alexander Hamilton to the people of the colonies, part of which is addressed directly to the farmers. This was written mainly in response to the allegations, insults, and propaganda that the so-called “Farmer” had made against the actions of the first continental Congress in America through his letter that had been printed in the newspapers of the time. In his letter, Hamilton takes a systematic approach in responding to the accusations of the “Farmer” and defending the judgements and decisions of the Continental Congress by the use of logic, examples, and indisputable proof. With the Coercive Acts in place, which in the eyes…

    • 1861 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Iowa had five seats, but due to reapportionment we lost a seat in the electoral college, symbolizing our loss of population. Redistricting is the redrawing of district to keep populations equal in the districts. Redistricting involves balancing populations and voter populations within the state, where as reapportionment…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a well functioning republic, voters elect officials whose ideals align with their own. To allow politicians with a vested interest in the way districts are drawn create congressional districts is inherently illogical, and, as the court cases in Wisconsin and our state have shown, politicians of both parties will act on this vested interest. Disproportionate representation is a result of gerrymandering when redistricting is placed in the hands of state legislatures, but it is not the only result. Packing districts also decreases political competition. The consequence of the lack of competition is increasing polarity in office.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, there is no legislation against redistricting. The most significant point the author made was the pressing issue of racial redistricting in Texas. Gerrymandering is the redistribution in which electoral district boundaries are drawn for electoral advantage. Gerrymandering is often used to hinder political parties, racial groups, or class groups.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Democrats accept there ought to just be cuts for center and low pay families, however trust they ought to be higher on organizations and well off people. The Republicans accept there ought to be tax reductions for everybody, both partnerships and individuals of all wage levels. I would choose to go to a democrat party, because the democrats are the only party that is doing anything for the middle class and the working class, enforcing laws against white collar crime, crooked business practices, the poisoning of our water and air, selling of hazardous products, illegal immigration, and on and on. Democrats in general try to act on behalf of the average American. Republicans are complete hypocrites who pretend to be morally superior but in reality are usually worse in their own habits.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Members Of Congress Essay

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Unlike the British Parliament, in which the political parties are only important kind of organization, parties are only one of many important units in Congress. Congress has the power to do many things, some examples are, The power to borrow money, declare war, lay and collect taxes, regulate commerce with foreign nations among the states, provide militia, and create courts inferior to the Supreme…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A law involving gerrymandering was passed in 1967 that banned multimember districts for fear of racism or an unfair advantage to one party (Yglesias). The argument for gerrymandering is that it balances the seats in Congress, half Republican and half Democrat, providing the minority more of a majority in congress. It also provides politicians the ability to safely guarantee the majority in the House does not change because of…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays