The Electoral College has been a way to elect our president for over 200 years. However, the times have changed, and the need to reform this process has come upon us. It does not represent the voice of the people. It creates an imbalance of power between states, and often creates confusion in our nation. The electoral college does more harm than good.
The Electoral College gives votes to states based on the amount of U.S Representatives and senators that that specific state has. Thus, certain states have more votes than others, which lessens the importance of states with a smaller population, like Hawaii or Rhode Island. Furthermore, certain states also have a history of choosing a certain political side. For example, California is known to be a predominantly democratic state, since most of the electors end up voting for the democratic party. As a result, there are only 10~15 states in which candidates pay attention to and campaign in. The Electoral College gives importance to only a few …show more content…
However, the times have changed, and technology allows people to research candidates and make decisions for themselves. Citizens now have the resources that they need to make decisions that they feel is good for the country, making the need for the electoral college outdated.
As a result of the electoral college, citizens aren’t actually voting for their president. In reality, people are actually voting for an elector who has pledged their support towards a certain candidate. This means that the vote of over 300 million people is being represented by only 538 electors. Furthermore, there is the risk of a faithless elector. A faithless elector is an elector who pledges their support for one candidate, but votes for a different candidate. This means that while voting, there is a chance that you are actually voting for someone
The Electoral College gives votes to states based on the amount of U.S Representatives and senators that that specific state has. Thus, certain states have more votes than others, which lessens the importance of states with a smaller population, like Hawaii or Rhode Island. Furthermore, certain states also have a history of choosing a certain political side. For example, California is known to be a predominantly democratic state, since most of the electors end up voting for the democratic party. As a result, there are only 10~15 states in which candidates pay attention to and campaign in. The Electoral College gives importance to only a few …show more content…
However, the times have changed, and technology allows people to research candidates and make decisions for themselves. Citizens now have the resources that they need to make decisions that they feel is good for the country, making the need for the electoral college outdated.
As a result of the electoral college, citizens aren’t actually voting for their president. In reality, people are actually voting for an elector who has pledged their support towards a certain candidate. This means that the vote of over 300 million people is being represented by only 538 electors. Furthermore, there is the risk of a faithless elector. A faithless elector is an elector who pledges their support for one candidate, but votes for a different candidate. This means that while voting, there is a chance that you are actually voting for someone