The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Arsenal

Improved Essays
People have different thoughts on if the U.S should retain or dismantle their nuclear arsenal. People that think it should be kept make arguments like how nuclear weapons help keep the U.S safe and how they can be used if there were to be any sort of war. On the contrary People that feel our nuclear weapons should be dismantled say our nuclear weapons cost too much to be kept and they make us seem hostile to other nations. So should the U.S keep its nuclear arsenal? Well there are lots of pros and cons to both sides of this argument. Some say one day nuclear weapons will be our demise, and others say nuclear weapons are the only reason we are still safe from nuclear war today. People that feel we should keep our nuclear arsenal make the arguments of nuclear weapons give the U.S a fear factor, or edge over other nations ( Pros and Cons of Nuclear Weapons Paragraph 5 ). Nuclear weapons give the reminder to other countries that if we go to war, we could easily obliterate them with the push of a button. …show more content…
And even if we never go to war with our weapons, Worldwide transgressions and arguments are solved easier because they know of our power. On the other hand people who believe our nuclear weapons should be dismantled state their view that nuclear weapons only cause problems. They make other nations not like us because nuclear weapons are very hostile and have nothing friendly about them and hurt the morals of our nation and others ( Pros and Cons of Nuclear Weapons Paragraph 8 ). North Korea feels the need to make more nuclear weapons because of ours. The United States should retain their nuclear arsenal because they help keep our nation safe, If we go to war we can use them to scare off other nations or worst case scenario, use the weapons, and nuclear weapons are more cost efficient than some may think. The United States should keep their nuclear arsenal because nuclear weapons help keep our nation safe from any current or future threats that come our way. However, they cause many problems. We have conflicts between nations just over nuclear weapons and for us to get rid of them. There is tension between the U.S and other nations because of our known nuclear weapons. Also if we were to use them in the future they would obliterate everything in the area attacked and wouldn’t have any mercy for the mass of innocent people. Above all, The U.S should keep their nuclear arsenal. Without our nuclear weapons, we are defenseless against other nations weapons of mass destruction. Non-Allied nations like North Korea, Iraq, and other nations that aren’t friendly with us don’t attack because they know we have more nuclear weapons than them and we can do lots more damage to them than they can do to us. The Edge we have over other nations is highly because of our nuclear weapons. It gives us a fear factor to other nations. Also having nuclear weapons helps settle conflicts or arguments easier. Nations will be civil with each other because nobody wants to use their nuclear weapons, and nobody wants to go to war in general. In conclusion, The United states should keep their nuclear arsenal because of the benefits of other nations not wanting to have conflicts with us because of our nuclear weapons and the status that comes with them. The United States should keep its nuclear arsenal because the United States is vulnerable without its nuclear weapons. Without nuclear weapons, the United States has no way of defending itself from other nation’s weapons of mass destruction. Our military cannot defend against things of that magnitude. If we were to dismantle our nuclear weapons, other nations would see us as weak and would feel as though we are an easy target for any sort of war or maybe even terrorist attacks for example. Opposing nations could threaten us and we would not have a way to respond with anything besides either attempting to defend ourselves. Nuclear weapons also help us give other smaller nations some say so or status in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear weapons have come into existence within the last decade. They have changed the way wars are fought as they could lead to the total extermination of humanity. These weapons can lead to mutual destruction of nations, which really have caused humans to reevaluate the way they conduct foreign affairs. Eric Schlosser’s article “Today’s nuclear dilemma” is about the nuclear weapons that countries control and what should be done with them. Schlosser argues that the current nuclear weapons active should be disarmed.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Though still after seeing all that destruction and death, people decide to continue to use and test nuclear weapons. This is because nuclear weapons have power and that is what people and nations want power. So, as technology progresses and even more weapons are made, then nuclear weapons will also become more advanced, and people will start using them again and again causing the death of people who have nothing to do with their problems. Nuclear weapons should not be used though, because of all the destruction and terror that they cause. Also the fact that they not only affect the other country or nation you are attacking but they also affect neighboring nations.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of nuclear energy should be a problem of national policy instead of military expediency, moreover, international control is the only effective approach towards the protection of our nation and foreign policy. Facts: If a race for nuclear armaments occurred,…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The decision to use the atomic bomb posed several significant moral dilemmas for President Harry S. Truman, among these were justifications, alternatives, and complications of the situation. After Teddy Roosevelt 's death, Truman was the new president with a huge decision to make only a few months after. People felt Truman was an insecure man and poorly informed by Roosevelt until his entry to the presidency. It was months later that he learned of America’s dark secret, the Manhattan Project. There were presumably three possible alternatives available to Americans to avoid using the atomic bomb such as invasion, increasing bomb threats and blockades of Japan, and negotiating peace.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I feel that the debate on the nuclear bomb and limits in wartime was overall a weak one. Both sides struggled to get their points across and explain them in a way that someone could understand them. The facts and evidence were present for most of the debate, but the connections to make great points were not. Out of all the points I feel the con side’s claim that there was alternatives to the nuclear bomb was lacking the most. This was due to the fact that whenever they were asked for any supporting evidence or examples of alternatives to the bomb they would shrug the asker off and move on.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    NK’s history of employing missiles, cyber-attacks, criminal activity, SOF and conventional forces proves them as the greatest hybrid threat to the US Military forces. A preemptive strike would be the last option if US were to engage in a war with NK according to strategists. However, the US must not be naive of NK’s capability and willingness to employ its advanced weapon systems and technologies. Reporting indicates that such weapons are dedicated to defeating the US’s precision strike and engagement capabilities. Furthermore, NK reports that they will undoubtedly employ its nuclear weapon systems if they believe its country or the Kim regime were ever at stake.…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nuclear weapons should be reduced because the threat of nuclear winter and even worse risks are too extreme. One of the scariest effects of nuclear weapons is nuclear winter. Nuclear winter is when smoke from nuclear explosions gets so dense that it blocks out the sun. This would block out all of the sunlight causing the earth to turn cold, gray, and dry causing plants and…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Either in the film or in the reality, the risks from nuclear weapons are too big and the use of these weapons is a threat to the humanity. Therefore, using nuclear weapons must be stopped…

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In our modern society, there exists this culture of fear that plagues all levels of society. This infection is believed by the masses to only be cured by the notion of security. Security, however, only prompts more fear. In effort to protect our ways of life, people justify various decisions and by these justifications, the commercialization of security is deemed acceptable and has become normalized. Professor Park posits that the Control need is the source of all evil.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bill Perry

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As it stated in the article, “unlike the original Cold War, this time there is a world of busy fanatics excited by the prospect of a planet with more bombs—people who have already demonstrated the desire to slaughter many thousands of people in an instant, and are zealously pursuing ever more deadly means to do so.” Along with that, people are not as prepared for a nuclear war to happen. I do realize that there is not much you can do if a bomb is dropped in the area you live in, but if everyone was given knowledge about them, it may be able to save some people in the surrounding areas. Many years ago, nuclear wars were a common topic of movies and people thought about the threat of them everyday, but that is the other difference from the times of the Cold War, “Americans no longer think about the threat everyday.” I thought this article was very interesting because I had never thought about how others may look at nuclear weapons, especially those that had experienced wars where these types of weapons were used in the past, like Bill…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This and the fact, countries settle disputes rather than going to war, and if they do go to war, they may not use nuclear weapons. The reason is because “neither the United States nor its enemies will ever start a nuclear war because the other side will retaliate massively and unacceptably”(Parrington). This means that for fear of utter destruction from the other side, countries will not start a massive war. Having little to no wars means that actually using weapons are unnecessary. If the weapons today, like nuclear bombs, are not being used, then why develop more powerful…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some Actions are taking place today with Nuclear threats between the U.S. and North Korea. As Ms. Hanham said in an interview from Monterey California, “The frustration I have is borne out of how casually we've started to talk about [nuclear weapons] as tools”. This is a complete different time and due to advancements, people realize bombings are effective but it has been used to fright others since it’s such a powerful resource, if it’s ever needed. However, a terrible threat toward another country should be taken seriously. It was risky to use a bomb like this if other countries had something similar it could have made thing worse but this risk was beneficial and saved the war from an unknowing future, which would have most likely been…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A nuclear weapon is an explosive device that derives its destructive force from nuclear reactions, either fission, in a fission bomb, or a combination of fission and fusion, like in a thermonuclear weapon. These weapons help make the world a more safe place, which is exactly why I believe that even though they are expensive, one Trillion Dollars over 30 years expensive, they are a necessary thing for today’s life. The production and use of nuclear weapons provide many jobs, help countries and nations be more or stay powerful, also make people not want to use them in a way. Nuclear weapons let countries maintain power or obtain power through military advantages. The weapons are weapons of mass destruction that nobody wants to mess with, causing other countries to respect the countries and nation that have these weapons.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    When the United States first developed the nuclear bomb it had secured its place as the most powerful nation in the world. There was no need for deterrence back then because nobody else had acquired nuclear bombs yet. Essentially the United States could get away with nuking anyone without any major consequences and without sending any ground troops. Only a few planes were needed to do the trick. It was only a matter of time before another state pursued the same technology and within a few years, the USSR had succeeded.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the U.S. dropped nuclear bombs on Japan the Soviet Union felt that they need to create their own nuclear weapon to ensure that the U.S. would not use one on them. Then in 1949 the Soviet Union set off their first nuclear weapon. The Soviet Union’s nuclear bomb test scared America because now the U.S. was not the only one with a nuclear weapon and now it felt threatened. As a result of the Soviet’s test the U.S. started to produce more nuclear weapons under the idea of deterrence. “The stockpile of both the United States and the Soviet Union increased in a nuclear arms race as each sought to develop a deterrent to the other, involving a second-strike capability” (Carlisle).…

    • 1824 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays