Jessica Wolfendale discusses what permitting torture would involve realistically in her work Training Torturers: A Critique of the “Ticking Bomb” Argument. The hypothetical ticking bomb argument fails to distinguish a justification of the general practice and individual instances of torture. She refers to the discussion as “a new war in which moral constraints do not apply”, for to allow torture is to allow the training of torturers. Historically they have been chosen for obedience, trustworthiness, political beliefs, and endurance of pain. Torturers would have to be trained in interrogational torture.…
Introducing the author Daniel J. Hill, he made good points on views of torture on how it could be permissible and not permissible. He introduced different scenarios on how to look at torture and was very interesting. One view he gave was a “defense case” that expressed that the officer spots a terrorist who plans to detonate a bomb that could risk lives of many. The officer made the choice to tase the terrorist just enough to paralyze him from making the bomb go off. Another case was the “interrogation case” that speaks about a terrorist planting a bomb somewhere and security services using electric shocks to get the terrorist to speak on the whereabouts of the bomb.…
Cathy Young, in the article How Much Torture is OK, makes a very valid point when talking about torture. She believes if some torture is considered to be OK all torture will be considered OK. To be more specific, if they make exceptions for some circumstances, then it’ll be hard to justify between what is right and wrong. She also mentioned that the ticking time bomb situation was highly improbable. Young is a pragmatist, she understands that there is no right answer to the situation but in this case she wants to preserve America's core…
There should be a fine line between allowing torture and not allowing torture. There should not be any gray area where a civilian who has not committed the crime can be…
Strained positions for long hours, sleep deprivation and waterboarding, with the occasional punch or slap, may sound worth it in order to save thousands of innocent Americans lives from the ongoing war of terror. It is a known fact that the American government used the term “enhanced interrogation” loosely in order to cover up their questionable actions to get any little piece of information about any terrorist motives with torture. Enhanced interrogation has been described as systematic torture in order to obtain potential terrorist information. Even though the CIA get their information, the process behind on how they got it always remains confidential only for the government. Because of the confidentiality this causes a problem to the public and foreign relations.…
The world soon joined the United Sates, and the end of World War II saw the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and in the 1980’s the United Nations adopted a detailed treaty on torture in peacetime. This left for a long standing terms of absolutely no torturing of any individual. However all of the decades of laws, and all of the championing of the United States against torture came crashing down in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. Following the September 11 terrorist attacks within the year the United States executive branch was using torture to gain information. This was against every single law because the United States and never officially declared war.…
There were no laws in the early 2000’s, like there are now, to hold back the Bush Administration from using EITs (enhanced interrogation) and there were actually some regulations supporting President Bush in his endeavors to find Osama Bin Laden through the use of EITs. The Military Commissions Act of 2006, for example, authorized the President to conduct military tribunals of enemy combatants and to hold them indefinitely without judicial review under the terms of habeas corpus, which is an order to bring a jailed person before a judge or court to find out if that person should really be in jail. It also ruled that, “Testimony coerced through humiliating or degrading treatment would be admissible in the tribunals”. Unfortunately, this didn’t last long because the U.S. Field Manuals on Counterinsurgency and Human Intelligence Collector Operations, released later that same year, which stated that, “no person in the custody or under the control of DOD, regardless of nationality or physical location, shall be subject to torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, in accordance with and as defined in U.S. law.” This means, however, that the government had several years where torture was at the height of use before its downward…
Regardless of the cuts (which may be reversed) made by the Obama Administration the reality is that the damage of the C.I.A. Detention and Interrogation Program is done. Hundreds have suffered under the program and the lasting psychological damage to many victims is severe and irreversible. Furthermore, the credibility of the C.I.A. to the American public and the U.S. government itself has been diminished because of their falsely reported information and excessive utilization of brutal interrogation tactics. Even today, the effects can be seen and the damage is still unfolding; the possibility that these tactics may be revived or even expanded under the Trump Administration is a frightening possibility.…
“I worked for George Bush. I’m proud to have worked for him. I think that a lot of the most controversial things we did , that people didn’t like and- and criticized us for, things like the terror surveillance program or the enhanced interrogation techniques, were things that allowed us to save lives.” -Dick Cheney. Cheney had been in congress for six terms before running for vice-president with George Bush.…
Desperate Times Would you ever hurt someone? What if hurting that someone meant that you would be seen as a hero amongst many? What if hurting someone meant that you were able to save innocent lives? What if hurting someone meant that you lost a piece of yourself and what it means to be human? `The topic at hand is if it is ever justifiable to torture someone under any circumstance.…
ENHANCED INTERROGATION TECHNIQUES According to a poll 46% of people who voted said yes EIT should be used. Everyone has heard or seen a threat and/or an act of violence. The military should be able to use Enhanced Interrogation techniques(EIT) because information not freely shared could lead to later events, the information that was gathered to prevent those events, and it could be used as a way to send a message or set an example. Information not freely shared could lead to later events.…
A practice that has been utilized as a form of torture3 must certainly contain elements of cruelty. Although solitary confinement may have been established with positive intentions, the continuance of its use in spite of a plethora of evidence uncovering its detrimental effects constitutes it as inhumane. Not only can solitary confinement be defined as cruel and unusual, but also cases like Brian Nelson’s where the reasoning and timeframe of sentence is unclear violates section 11a which states that in criminal and penal matters, individuals have the right “to be informed without reasonable delay of the specific…
I want to know these answers because I feel that this country should never resort to torture for anything. I believe that there is a way to handle the most dangerous prisoners and I don’t believe that the way is through torture. If solitary confinement really is a form of torture it would meant that our country has resorted to fighting fire with fire, which will only lead to everyone getting…
There is a distinct difference between an interrogation and a set of interview questions. Sometimes, they are used interchangeably, but there is a specific feature distinguishing one from the other. Whether it is accusatory or not is what differentiates an interrogation from a set of interview questions. An interview is non-accusatory or, in other words, it does not blame or put guilt on the subject of the questions (Inbau, Reid, Buckley, & Jayne, 2013). Besides just being non-accusatory, an interview is used merely to gather information in any environment, and it is normally unstructured (Inbau, Reid, Buckley, & Jayne, 2013).…
Former CIA agent, Jose A. Rodriguez, Jr. dedicated the majority of his life (thirty-one years) to serving the United States of America. Before becoming a member of the CIA 's Counterterrorism Center (CTC), he spent twenty-five years working undercover, later becoming the chief of the Directorate of Operations ' Latin American Division. After the horrific events of September 11th, Rodriguez was more than happy to become a part of the CIA 's CTC. In his book Hard Measures, Rodriguez attempts to defend the CIA 's actions and treatment of detainees suspected to have had involvement in the 9/11 events and of planning future attacks on the United States and its citizens.…