The Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

Improved Essays
Gerrymandering is the act of redrawing district lines, after a census, in a way that favors a specific political party. It is a perfectly legal practice that is used by both parties in hopes of influencing the party that controls Congress, and subordinate state and local governments. Two common strategies of gerrymandering are packing and cracking. Packing occurs when a district is drawn so that voters of a specific party are included into a single district, in order to limit the influence of that specific party. Cracking occurs when a district is drawn so that voters of a specific party are spread out between several districts in order to limit their influence in a specific district.
There are only two federal rules regarding redistricting;

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Gerrymandering Case Study

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are many solutions to this issue, but the most effective and instantaneously acting one would be to take the power of redrawing district lines entirely out of the hands of the legislature and let an independent nonpartisan commission take over the job (Prokop, 2015). This method would work very well and almost entirely rid Texas of gerrymandering. Other states actually use a similar method to this called ostensible redistricting commissions, but the problem with this is that the politicians appoint the members of the commission. In result, the commissions are not actually independent, and the legislature still holds some control over the situation, essentially making this method ineffective in eliminating partisan gerrymandering. Fortunately, there are several other ways to eliminate gerrymandering, such as the abandonment of the single member plurality system and replacing it with proportional representation.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Partisan Gerrymandering is the process legislators go to though, by either drawing or changing district boundaries, to make sure one political party has an advantage when it comes to the outcome of an election. This takes away the whole point of being a democratic country where people have the freedom to choose their own government, and representation. Because elections are rigged and peoples votes don't count, legislators makeup district boundaries that only benefit them, and most importantly keep a party chosen by them and only them in a secure route to WIN, without caring about what the voters actually want. Making partisan gerrymandering a big threat to democracy because instead of having the people choose, politicians are choosing for them. Since legislators draw the district…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Week article “How to rig elections, the legal way”, The week staff describes how parties gain an advantage by redrawing voting districts. This process of redrawing voting districts to favor one’s political party is considered gerrymandering. It creates districts that are irregularly shaped and is a legal process unless it violates the 1965 voting rights act which makes it illegal to redistrict based off of minority voters. Gerrymandering has been successful in recent years because in 2012 gerrymandered states such as Pennsylvania won 49% of the vote and took 72% of house seats. Redistricting is overseen by whoever controls the state legislature and happens every ten years with data collected from the recent census.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gerrymandering is a type of strategy that some politicians use to manipulate the count in state votes by using districts to make one party have an advantage over the opposing party. For example, when the United States, counts the votes made by people electorally, each state is broken up into districts based on their population. The number of…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the United States reapportionment and redistricting are both processes for deciding voting lines. Reapportionment is the process of reassessing the amount of congressional house seats for each state. Reapportionment is conducted through a census. This takes place every ten years, during which every person, citizen or not, is counted in each state. The process also decides the amount of votes each state gets for the electoral College.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a well functioning republic, voters elect officials whose ideals align with their own. To allow politicians with a vested interest in the way districts are drawn create congressional districts is inherently illogical, and, as the court cases in Wisconsin and our state have shown, politicians of both parties will act on this vested interest. Disproportionate representation is a result of gerrymandering when redistricting is placed in the hands of state legislatures, but it is not the only result. Packing districts also decreases political competition. The consequence of the lack of competition is increasing polarity in office.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prison Gerrymandering

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the case “Davidson v. City of Cranston” the City of Cranston, Rhode Island counted inmates as part of the total population when conceiting district lines, causing prison gerrymandering. The first district found that the City of Cranston had not violated the Equal Protection Clause. In a sense, prison gerrymandering legal under Evenwel v. Abbott. Prison Gerrymandering is “the practice of counting incarcerated people as residents of prisons when drawing electoral districts” (Davidson v. City). This case has many contradictions to the rule of law including multiple factors.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Race can't be the only factor for redrawing legislative boundaries/ district lines. Questions…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, there is no legislation against redistricting. The most significant point the author made was the pressing issue of racial redistricting in Texas. Gerrymandering is the redistribution in which electoral district boundaries are drawn for electoral advantage. Gerrymandering is often used to hinder political parties, racial groups, or class groups.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I completely agree with the possible theories you outlined for why land redistribution in the United States would not be a positive idea. While there has been precedent set for land redistribution in other countries, America would not make a good candidate for these programs. I personally believe that the main reason that this program would not work today is the high cost of land and legal rights guaranteed to Americans. In 2015, the average cost of one acre of farmland was $3020 and this price continues to rise every year. This high expense gives the landowner the legal rights to keep his property for themselves.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In most states historically the same party wins and the presidential candidates expect to keep this support. The outcome of the presidential race will be decided in the states that can support both Republican and Democrat. Swing states - states in which none of the presidential candidates has a decisive advantage. In such states, it takes place the most intense struggle for votes, because the victory in them almost guarantees election victory. A quantity of swing state vacillates; it changes not only from election to election, but in a particular election year - from expert to expert.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many Americans believe a representative democracy is unfair. They believe the only truly fair way to voice opinion is through a direct democracy. But, the truth is, American citizens would not be able to function efficiently in a direct democracy because our political culture is far better suited for a representative democracy. Our form of government as a representative democracy works so well because the majority of Americans agree on the same views. Culture in America tends to be more suited for a representative democracy rather than a direct democracy because they are generally uneducated and unwilling to learn on most concerns and are more inclined to put themselves first instead of thinking of the group as a whole.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A law involving gerrymandering was passed in 1967 that banned multimember districts for fear of racism or an unfair advantage to one party (Yglesias). The argument for gerrymandering is that it balances the seats in Congress, half Republican and half Democrat, providing the minority more of a majority in congress. It also provides politicians the ability to safely guarantee the majority in the House does not change because of…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If a candidate knows they have half the people in district five and six they have the right to change the districts lines to create one district out of the two. Dr. Cannon (2016) works for One…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the goals of Virginia 2021 is to make political gerrymandering illegal as well. Throughout Dr. Cannon’s lecture we were able to discover the ways in which politics has changed he presented us with different graphs on how liberal and moderate congress and the senate has changed over the years. As the chart got closer to the present time there is less and less moderate people. Presenting that we as a nation are changing our mentality in politics. Dr. Cannon also pointed out that because of our regulation of voting for congress and senate we are constantly electing the same person into office.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays