Many supporters believe electronic cigarettes are less dangerous and hazardous than regular cigarettes (Khan A.10; Fairchild). Likewise, electronic cigarettes are not completely risk free, but cause a fraction of the harm as traditional cigarettes (Berwick). Although other supporters claim less toxic effects, evidence proves they still produce dangerous health risks (Natanson and Lovett). Supporters claim e-cigarettes provide a safer alternative; however, evidence proves the negative health effects. Thus, their reasoning fails. As well as that, supporters claim switching from electronic cigarettes will cost more in the beginning, but will ultimately save money in the long run (Friedman). It is also a cheap way to reduce smoking (Berwick). Regardless of the cost, is it really worth the risk of putting toxins in the body from an unknown product, when no one realizes the long-term
Many supporters believe electronic cigarettes are less dangerous and hazardous than regular cigarettes (Khan A.10; Fairchild). Likewise, electronic cigarettes are not completely risk free, but cause a fraction of the harm as traditional cigarettes (Berwick). Although other supporters claim less toxic effects, evidence proves they still produce dangerous health risks (Natanson and Lovett). Supporters claim e-cigarettes provide a safer alternative; however, evidence proves the negative health effects. Thus, their reasoning fails. As well as that, supporters claim switching from electronic cigarettes will cost more in the beginning, but will ultimately save money in the long run (Friedman). It is also a cheap way to reduce smoking (Berwick). Regardless of the cost, is it really worth the risk of putting toxins in the body from an unknown product, when no one realizes the long-term