Why Is Civil And Criminal Law Important

Improved Essays
Civil & Criminal Law 2 There is a level of importance everyone must have in understanding the law systems’ purpose. That knowledge enables everyone to comprehend what’s expected of each and every person. Also, everyone would share the right to judge crimes committed based upon the criteria established in state rules and regulations. Crime plagues our neighborhoods and communities. There are many people who commit crime that don’t care about the value of life and will justify their reasoning to commit their crimes. Some people have hope or belief that they are safe and that we are protected. A great deal of faith is held within the law system. It’s all people have to live in their communities’ worriless. According to David Friedman’s, “Should We Abolish Civil Law?” discussion he points out our paralegal systems have two categories: civil law and criminal law. Friedman’s discussion highlighted characteristics and differences between criminal and civil law. In the criminal law system the state is the one who would own the claim, they would be the ones to decide to settle out of court, the would also choose to not prosecute. (Friedman, 2012) Civil & Criminal Law 3 In addition, they will administer punishment along with a fine, and could incarcerate or execute. (Friedman, 2012) In the civil law the victim would own the claim, decide to settle out of court, and choose not to prosecute. (Friedman, 2012) The punishments would deal with award of monetary compensation. Sometimes there are also fines. (Friedman, 2012) Frank Schmallenger states a civil law governs relationships between and among people, businesses, or organizations. (Schmalleger) It has rules that govern many contracts and social obligations. (Schmalleger) When civil law is violated a civil suit follows. (Schmalleger) Civil law deals with personal matters such as a divorce, child custody, and child support. (Schmalleger) Each state is governed by their set of rules concerning such civil matters. It also includes property transfer, wills, contracts, fraud, etc. A contract violation is known as a tort. (Schmalleger) A victim of a tort requires property rights. (Friedman, 2012) It’s up to the victim, also known as the plaintiff, to file a motion in court. (Schmalleger) The defendant is the one whom the plaintiff is suing. (Schmalleger) Civil & Criminal Law 4 Civil suits are sometimes brought by crime victims against those …show more content…
(www.differencebetween.com) Crime is of a serious nature that poses threats to “peace and order of society.” (www.differencebetween.com) The legal perspective says that crime is an act that violates criminal law of a country. (www.differencebetween.com) Because of the high value put on freedom, defendants have more rights and protections than civil defendants. (www.rbs2.com) In criminal cases, the state will always have the burden of proof. (www.rbs2.com) They have to prove the defendant is guilty and that the defendant satisfies the element of statutory definition of the crime and participation was beyond a reasonable doubt. (www.rbs2.com) Civil cases, the burden of proof is with the plaintiff, initially, and depending on the situations it can shift to the defendant. (www.rbs2.com) The differences between acquittal and civil liability affect the findings of the case. An acquittal is when the prosecutor has failed to prove the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and civil liability is when the defendant is responsible for paying for the plaintiff’s losses.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Willingham's Innocence

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Executing an Innocent Man " Death row” , this quotation remind me of a story that happened in Texas in 1991 for Todd Willingham, as detailed by the Travis County District Court of Texas. The latter was executed as he was found guilty of the murder of this three children in a fire that took place at their home. The official document also emphasizes that the wrongful execution of Willingham is a tragedy and must never happen again. Thus there are two objectives to this document. The first is the restore the good name of Willingham, and secondly, to ensure that a tragedy of this kind never happens again that of executing an innocent man.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the case of Christie v. Dobbyn2, it is not essential for the plaintiff to prove that the defendant knew if the dog is of a vicious or mischievous nature. Plaintiff Uniqua does not have to prove if Bob’s dog was harmful by nature or had bitten any other person in the past. By looking at the Donahue v. Belitski case, plaintiff went to the defendant property and was bitten by the dog and in this case, defendant was responsible for the damages in doctrine of scienter and negligence. Infact, in to Christie v. Dobbyn2 case, plaintiff entered defendant’s house with her 9 year old daughter.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Examines the offender’s background to provide the sentencing judge with facts needed to make an informed sentencing decision. It also involves a dispute-settlement process during which the probation officer works with the defendant and the victim to resolve the complaint before sentencing (Schmalleger, 2015). In the Coatesville Fire Case, the offenders the prosecuting attorney would look at the evidence, testimony of eyewitnesses, and the confessions of the suspects to provide the sentencing judge with the facts to decide on the case. Determines whether the case should be referred for formal court proceedings or held open for adjustment services (Schmalleger, 2015).…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Casey Anthony Case

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “ Even if it is ‘likely’ or ‘probable’ that she committed the murder, she must be acquitted. The standard is proof beyond a reasonable doubt. ”(Dershowitz, WSJ) In 2008, Casey Anthony, mother to 3 year old Caylee Anthony, stepped into the public eye for being suspected of the disappearance of her daughter. Casey’s mother and father, George and Cindy Anthony, questioned their daughter’s ability to be a fit mother.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Criminal laws are punishable, with determination of guilt. Actions taken against criminals can also be looked at as a deterrent for others to not partake in similar or the same actions. The four primary sources of law are the U.S. Constitution, statutes passed by Congress and/or state legislations,…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Justice itself is a complex concept, necessary for the functioning of most modern societies. It establishes a system that ensures individuals are treated impartially, fairly, and equally, upholds moral and legal principles, and establishes and protects the rights of those involved. The definition and interpretation of justice is highly dependent on culture, existing legal systems, and in some cases tradition and religion, however most justice systems are based on several key aspects including fairness and equality, rule of law, morality and ethics and human rights. (Soken-Huberty, 2022) Having a fair and just legal system is essential in the path of justice.…

    • 2992 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Supreme Court case, Nelson v. Colorado, the judgment revolves around the constitutionality of the Colorado Exoneration Act. This act stated that monetary fines paid due to conviction charges can only be returned to the exonerated individual if they can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they are innocent of the accused crime. The constitutionality of this law was debated and in question in regards to the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. I concur in the recent Supreme Court decision that the Colorado Exoneration Act should be ruled as unconstitutional. I am in assent with this recent decision that the current Colorado law is unconstitutional because it violates the Fourteenth Amendment, which protects United States citizen’s right to a fair trial, undermines the legitimacy and authority of a criminal court proceeding, and also contradicts the precedent established in various courts that…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federal Court System

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A civil case is essentially a person or a company that inquires a judge to settle civil problems. What 's unique to a civil case that shows clear distinction from a criminal case is that it resolves issues regarding inheritance, a contract, a family dispute such as divorce or child custody, and damage suffered due to another person’s lack of responsibility. The majority of civil cases end with the requirement of the person responsible for damage, or other problems (defendant) needs to provide compensation to the plaintiff using reimbursement of money, restoring the property, or fulfilling promised services. On the contrary, a criminal case is ultimately a person that is taken into custody and presented before the court because of the alleged crime he/she has committed. The jury and judge 's obligation is always to bear into contemplation the evidence that 's presented before the court to make a final verdict of guilty or not guilty.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is the legal standard to determine if a defendant is competent to stand trial? Competency to stand trial (CST) came about to light in the U.S. Supreme Court case Dusky v. United State which established that in order for a defendant to be tried that they have must have sufficient present ability to consult with their lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding and factual understanding of the proceedings against him (Dusky v. United States, 1960). Kruh and Grisso (2009) provide analysis of some of the terms that were used in the Dusky test: • Sufficient ability and reasonable understanding specify that CST does not require complete and fully unimpaired functioning, whereas reasonable implies to relativity to the context…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The writers we read view the purpose of law differently. One writer that may explain why race, class, and gender have in impact in the American criminal justice system is Hay. Hay conclude that the purpose of law is to maintain social order and hierarchy. The United States at is inception had a clear social order and hierarchy. Over time this social order and hierarchy has been disrupted by individuals seeking to get a fair shake in this country.…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is the portrayal of crime by the news media accurate? During this assignment, I will discuss how the distorted pictures of criminality are presented to the public and how the media portray crime and how crime gets into the media. Crime is an act that breaks the law. And a criminal is a person who has committed a crime that has broken the law and has been legally convicted of that crime.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are three primary theories in psychology which help to give meaning in defining what is identified as crime. Although the notion of defining crime is not a simple matter, these three theories shed light on the subject. The most straightforward answer to contextualising crime depends on factors or variables within a society. In today's society the most common meaning 'crime' has depends on three views. The Consensus View, The Conflict View, and The Interactionist View.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Burden Of Proof Essay

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The burden of proof when it comes to the criminal justice system is different for both civil and criminal cases. For a civil case the burden of proof is the preponderance of the evidence, while in a criminal case the burden of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt. It is fair to say that the civil law’s level of intentionality and burdens is easier to prove than the criminal case. With a criminal case, the prosecutors must meet to get a conviction. In a criminal case the defendant is innocent until proven guilty.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should There Any Judgement Limitation of Testimonial in Social Media ? Social medias are computer-mediated tools that allow people or companies to create, share, or exchange information, career interests, ideas, and pictures/videos in virtual communities and networks. Social media is a wonderful channel for brands to engage with their target tribe.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I strongly thought that a world without crime is the ideal and perfect way of life. This was not the case; in fact it has come to me that crime is almost essential to going about with everyday life. Crime has a purpose of reinforcing the moral codes amongst society; it helps people know what actions are right and wrong. Durkheim, a new theorist for me, described crime as being “those actions that offended against collective feelings or sentiments”. NEWBURN, T. (2013) Durkheim, anomie and strain.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays