On July 26, 2006, the Texas jury in her retrial found that Yates was not guilty by reason of insanity. She was consequently committed by the court to the North Texas State Hospital, Vernon Campus. She in the hospital watching the video of her children when she murdered them. Obviously her mental health issues are severe.…
Andrea Yates was a previous Houston, Texas occupant who executed her five kids on June 20, 2001 by suffocating them in the bathtub in her home. She was found guilty of first degree murder and sentenced to life, but a court of appeals reversed the conviction and found her insane. She had been languishing over some time with extremely serious post pregnancy anxiety and baby blues psychosis. Her case put the M'Naghten Rules with the Irresistible Impulse Test, a lawful test for rational soundness, under close open examination in the United States. Yates' 2002 conviction of capital murder and sentence to life in jail with the likelihood of parole following 40 years was later toppled on request.…
Image your son is suffering from schizophrenia disorder and he does something that is illegal. Now imagine your son goes to court is found guilty and has to go prison, even though he had no understand of what he did. Eric Clark was a boy who suffered from schizophrenia. He went to court because he shot a police officer. He had no idea what he had done was wrong because he was having delusions.…
Malingering (Faking) the Insanity Defense The story at the beginning of this paper illustrates this issue well, even though, it is quite uncommon. Studies have shown that about 82% of insanity defendants have been diagnosed with major medical illnesses. So, what about the 18% that were not diagnosed with a mental illness? Could it be that they were faking it the whole time?…
Their proof must show that the accused has criminal liability, accountability, or culpability (Pg. 255). In the absence of one or both of the attributes the insanity may be used. To begin with, as stated by Torry and Billick, the insanity defense was used as far back as 1581 when there was a legal note in place for those who could distinguish the difference between right and wrong and those who could not (Pg. 256). By the Eighteenth Century the insanity defense was distinguished by, if the accused could only understand the ramifications of what he had done like an infant or even a wild animal would, then he would not be held responsible for said crime. Today, however, the law uses several different rules, including the M’Naghten rule, to determine if person’s mental state during the act of committing the crime was such that he will use the insanity defense.…
The case of Andrea Yates is one of the most infamous cases in the last decade and the reason for that is because Andrea’s mental state leading up to the murders. Andrea Yates in 2001 drowned all five of her children in a bathtub in her Huston, Texas home. However, was she responsible for her actions? Andrea suffered from several mental illnesses including postpartum depression. She was constantly in and out of mental health institutions and was given medication to deal with her depression.…
“Not Guilty by reason of insanity” This could be used in a plea in a court of a person charged with a crime who admits the act, but whose attorney says that they were too mentally ill at the time to determine whether it was right or wrong. In the short story, “The Tell Tale Heart” by Edgar Allan Poe it describes a crazy man who kills another man. The story takes place in an old house in the old man’s bedroom. The main character explains to the reader about his obsession of the old man. His obsession is concerning the old man’s “vulture looking” eye.…
The lawyer that stood to defend Yates described her as one of insanity as she had no control of her mental self when she committed the crime. “Andrea Yates had undergone intense medication that would have messed her mental self. The several doctors that she had been through gave her strong medication that rendered her body weak” (Denno, 2003). This gave her hallucinations, depressions among other attributes of a mental ill person. In addition to this, she was going through intense pressure from her family; her husband wanted to get another child against the recommendation of her doctor, while her father had passed away.…
Andrea Yates had a strong personal reasoning to the homicide charges brought against her for killing her children. The primary defense expert, Dr. Resnick, had a belief that Andrea killed her children because in her mind she thought she was saving them from going to hell. If the delusions that she was having existed, and imagining that those delusions represent reality, then Andrea was justified in her actions. But, if she were accountable for the delusions that she was having and knew that they would lead to harming the children, then she would not be justified in her actions (Slobogin, C., 2002). The evidence that was presented at trial implied that Andrea, before the act had been committed, had concealed her psychotic symptoms and delusions from her therapist and was not taking her medication, and she knew when she did not take her medicine that her delusional thoughts to kill her children would get worse (Slobogin, C., 2002).…
“You must plead insanity. You must give the jury a way out. You must show them a way to find him not guilty if they are so inclined. If they’re sympathetic, if they want to acquit, you must provide them with a defense they can use to do it. It makes no difference if they believe the insanity crap.…
The insanity plea is a defense in the court of law put in place for people who suffer from mental illness and commit crimes. Under this defense, the mentally ill are not entirely held responsible for their actions given the terms that they were not in the correct state of mind when the crime took place. The person would admit to committing the crime, but then say they are not guilty by reason of insanity (Francone). This plea has been used in my cases throughout history.…
For centuries, criminals have been categorized as insane, but does that justify their crime? The majority of higher profile criminals file for the insanity plea which then affects their punishment and life, causing us to consider if ours is safe. The insanity defense should not be admissible in court because of the interest for the public, increases in legal costs, and manipulation of the legal system. The insanity defense’s history plays into our everyday legal actions and in order to understand the problem, you need to understand the defense.…
Jrank points out that many people have misconceptions about the insanity defense. One of these misconceptions is that it is used more often than it actually is. The defense is only attempted in about one percent of all criminal cases, and only twenty percent of these attempts actually win their cases (Jrank 1). One thing that people do not think about is that when a defendant pleads insanity they are admitting their guilt; because of this if they do not win their plea they will automatically be given a guilty verdict. They could also receive a more severe punishment for trying to go through with an insanity defense if they are found to be free of any type of mental illness.…
According to Bartol and Bartol (2011, p. 244) if an individual pleads not guilty by the circumstance of insanity, then the psychiatric evaluation should be focused on the individual 's mental state at the time of the crime. This basis is very much in line with the recommendation of Dr. Siegel in his letter to the…
According to law, a person is “not guilty by reason of insanity” if they do not have the capacity to know right from wrong, therefore;…