Julius Caesar Act 3 Analysis

Improved Essays
"Et Tu., Brute?” (Shakespeare III.i.77) The phrase stated by the mighty Caesar before his

fall and death, meaning,“and you Brutus” in the Latin language. This line changed set off the

course of nature as it rapidly changed the play. From that point there was an unbalance in Rome.

A struggle for power between 2 teams consisting of 2 leaders and their armies. The tension builds

and so many things are occurring in the same time as of Act IV, Scene 2-3 of Julius Caesar. Most

of the action falls somewhere around these scenes, so the point of this paper is too: explain what

occurred in Act IV, Scenes 2-3 of Julius Caesar, the power of both teams, problems that occur

within each team, and who will most likely rise or fall.

After the death of Caesar, Mark Anthony rallied the people against the conspirators, and with the help of Octavius, the general of the Roman Army, they plan to protect and restore Rome to a settle state.
…show more content…
Mark Anthony plans out an attack against all who were contributors to the death

of Caesar. On the other side the two main benefactors to the assassination of Julius Caesar, are

building an army preparing to either strike or best protect themselves for the better of Rome.

Brutus and Cassius prepare for the unknown future looking to change Rome for what they think

is the predominant good.(Shmoop Editorial Team)(Shakespeare Julius Caesar IV.ii-iii)

Probably the most informal scenes about Brutus and Cassius’ position post-Caesars

slaying is Act IV, Scene 2-3. Scene 2 is a short scene that takes place at a camp near Sardis,

located in present-day Turkey in front of Brutus’ tent. It begins with the entrance of Lucillius, a

friend of Brutus, talking to Brutus about Pindarus, a servant of Cassius, who is on his way to

greet Brutus. Cassius then shows up talks to Brutus about how he wronged him. Brutus then tells

Cassius to send the armies away and invites Cassius into his tent. Brutus then commands

Lucillius to guard the tent door with Lucius and Titinius and to allow no entrance to anyone who

wants to come in. With that they exit and conclude scene 2.(Shmoop Editorial Team) (Shakespeare Julius Caesar IV.ii-iii)(Julius Caesar: Character Profiles) Scene 3 kicks off with Cassius informing Brutus about how he wrong him. According to Cassius, Brutus threw Lucius Pella in prison for selling bribes to the Sardinians. Cassius also told him about a letter that he wrote Brutus to release Lucius. Brutus then explains to Cassius that he has,“an itching palm," or a thirst for money. He then says that Cassius is very greedy and thats why he’s selling high ranking jobs to rich people who don 't deserve it but buy it. Brutus then asks if Cassius remembers the Ides of March when they killed Caesar for the sake of Rome. He says that they killed him for the better of Rome and know Cassius is making it worse by selling jobs that should be earned to the rich who don 't deserve it. Cassius then tries to warn Brutus by saying that he’s older and a better soldier so don 't get him angry. Then they argue back and forth on who is and who isn’t. Brutus then challenges him to a fight which Cassius backs out of and says I said I am an older soldier not a better one. They then started a new problem. According to Brutus, he asked Cassius for money to pay his soldiers, but Cassius, with all his wealth, denied his request. Cassius claims to have not denied it and that the messenger must have messed up. Cassius then pulls out his dagger and requests for Brutus to end his life right there. Brutus looks and him and tells him to put his dagger up. Then apologies are exchanged and they shake hands. After their handshake a poet forces himself in the room and tells he two not to argue. They look at him and mock him and his rhymes. (Shmoop Editorial Team)(Shakespeare Julius Caesar IV.ii-iii)(Julius Caesar: Character Profiles) After the big argument, Brutus requests for a big bowl of wine from Lucius. Cassius thinks he wants the wine because he can’t believe how angry he was. Brutus then explains

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In the first act, there are two important conflicts. One of the main conflicts are that Cassius got Brutus to join his side for his own gain. Brutus is struggling with himself because he can’t persuade himself that he acted for the good of rome. The second main conflict is that there's currently no future leadership of Rome. Cassius wants all of the power, so he is trying to convince Brutus not to let Mark Antony speak at the funeral.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act 4 Scene 2 of Julius Caesar, Brutus greets Titinius and Pindarus, who tell him that Cassius has almost arrived at the camp site. Brutus is eager to confront Cassius because he says that he offended him and looks forward to hearing his explanation. As soon as Cassius shows up with most of his army he immediately says that Brutus had wronged him and also wants an explanation. They decide to take the dilemma inside the tent so the armies won’t see their argument. This scene shows that even though Brutus and Cassius were best friends they still had issues.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The men begin to plan their battle strategies, and this is where the audience is allowed a glimpse into the minds of the combatants. Brutus and Cassius continuously fight and are not organised in the least sense. Throughout the entirety of the play, the two could only agree on one thing. That Caesar meant the end of Rome and had to be destroyed. Afterwards, with no enemy to fight, the two turned on one another.…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ]/ Let Antony and Caesar fall together” (II.ii.157-163). Brutus then responds, “Our course will seem too bloody, Caius Cassius, / […] / For Antony is but a limb of Caesar” (II.ii.164-167). This conversation demonstrates the arrogance of Brutus and the disagreements between Brutus and Cassius. Their loyalty struggles at times, especially when it comes to decision making.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Et tu, Brutè?- then fall, Caesar” (III, i, 85). The last words spoken by the leader, the tyrant, the man named Julius Caesar. In the play “The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare, The leader of Rome in 44 B.C.E, Julius Caesar, is assassinated by his closest allies, men he perceived to be loyal to him, among them are Caius Cassius and Marcus Brutus, who were killed in revenge by Mark Antony, Caesar’s most loyal comrade. Caesar is killed by Brutus and Cassius because they were not loyal to him, but to Rome and himself respectively and avenged by Antony because he was loyal to Caesar. “Yond Cassius has a lean and hungry look./…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although people generally believe they are persuaded by ideas that they have discovered, William Shakespeare’s historic tragedy, Julius Caesar illustrates that an individual’s thoughts are inevitably shaped by external factors. Persuasion and suggestion are rhetorical skills that play central roles in Julius Caesar, but they also demonstrates how individuals bend towards words they want to hear when faced with a difficult situation. The play cautions the dangers and powers of rhetoric as a tool for manipulation and reminds us how easily and completely an audience can be both won and lost in terms of persuasion. In the few early scenes we are able to see Cassius promoting his own views upon Brutus.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Brutus speaks these words about himself while talking to Cassius, he is acknowledging that his personal thoughts and difficulties are preventing him from showing compassion towards those around him. Cassius is curious and apprehensive as to why Brutus has been acting strange lately. Brutus recognizes he is in a troubled situation in his mind and is mentally at war with himself initiating him to disregard displaying any sign of affection towards his friends. Brutus elucidates that he is “with himself at war,” which implies that he is in a distressed position mentally and conflicted between mindsets.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Sacrifice

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare’s usage of central ideas develops a suspenseful theme in the play. In the midst of turmoil between the tribunes and Caesar, Shakespeare made Caesar’s death a “sacrifice” rather than a “butchery”. The first three acts of the play portray the relationship between Caesar and those who conspire against him. Amongst the conspirators, Caesar is seen as a tyrant over the people of Rome.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Act IV, Scene II begins in a camp near Sardis in Brutus’ tent. Brutus asks Lucilius if Cassius is “near”. Cassius and his army appeared in the camp and Brutus standing outside of his tent, Cassius tells Brutus, “You have done me wrong brother!” Brutus is confused because he doesn’t know what he has done wrong.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The title alone of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare speaks volumes about the nature of Caesar’s death. Labeling the leader’s fall as a tragedy creates an aura of sadness around the loss, portraying his murder as an unfortunate and brutal occurrence. However, the motives of the conspirators that ended Caesar’s life were not wholly ruthless. Rather, this group of men sought to save Rome from the tyranny and negligence that they believed was being perpetrated by Caesar himself. The fact that their intentions were honest and their violence was limited to the bare minimum suggests that the death of Caesar is better described as a sacrifice than a butchery.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The profusion of power in understanding a person’s weaknesses allows for the potential of manipulation. When utilized in the right way, this power has the capability of persuading people to do things they never could have imagined. Through the actions of the characters in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, William Shakespeare demonstrates how manipulation of the naive can result in one’s success, but when used carelessly, it can lead to fatal consequences. If clever enough, exploiting the weak characteristics of the noble, loyal, and arrogant allows for the manipulator to control them and ultimately compel them into believing what they’re being told.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Latin word “noble” is defined as “having, showing, or coming from personal qualities that people admire such as honesty, generosity, courage...etc”(Webster 's Dictionary). In the 1800’s the word, “noble” was used in many books, speeches and other works of writing. Over time, the adjective “noble” is being used less and less in literature. Noble is commonly used to describe someone with high morals and great character. In the last lines of the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, the character Mark Antony concludes about Brutus, “This was the noblest Roman of them all” (V.v. 74-81).…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drama Analysis Essay In literature, the character’s tragic flaw, ultimately brings about their downfall. Regardless of the intention or character’s best efforts, the tragic flaw will bring about the destruction of the character. A tragedy is a play that shows the fall of a noble hero from high standing to a disaster because of a character flaw. In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar and Brutus go through this during the course of the play.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Julius Caesar and Brutus: A Comparison In the Shakespearean Classic Julius Caesar, many intricate characters are presented and compounded throughout the storyline. However, I will focus on the two main characters from this play, and compare their morals and personalities, to decide which one is the better man. In this essay, three main points will be presented. Caesars faults, morals, and actions Brutus 's faults, morals, and actions Which one seems to be the more needed in Rome By the end of this comparison essay, I hope to have shown the characters for who they are, and how they act, along with their basic morals.…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus is the one character in the entirety of the play who does intend to double-cross anyone, much like the seemingly trustworthy Mark Antony, and he does not have hidden reasons for engaging in the plot to murder Caesar, as Cassius does. Brutus simply wants the best for Rome as shown in Act I, Scene II on lines 163-175, “ That u-you do love me I am nothing jealous … Brutus rather be a villager…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays