The Debates Of Abraham Lincoln And Stephen A. Douglas

Improved Essays
Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas were two prominent figures in American politics in the 1850’s. Douglas, a spokesperson for the Democratic party, was looking to be reelected for his third term in the United States Senate. Lincoln, a representative for the Republican party, was running for the Senate in the very seat that Douglas currently held. These two men engaged in a series of seven debates, that would garner national attention and speak to various issues regarding the political climate of the United States during this time such as slavery. In the book, The Lincoln- Douglas Debates of 1858, we learn the two different positions of these men on slavery, freedom, equality, and race. They also reveal insight into political events of the 1850’s such as the Dred Scott decision, the Freeport Doctrine, and the Civil …show more content…
Douglas did not take a stance on slavery. He could not be considered proslavery or antislavery. But he did clearly believe in the idea of popular sovereignty. In his speech Chicago on July 9th, Douglas addresses this issue. He says, “My object was to secure the right of each State and of each territory, North or South, to decide the question for themselves, to have slavery or not, just as they choose...” (Lincoln Douglas Debates, 27). Douglas believed that the people should make the decision of if they should have slavery or not. He made this very clear throughout these debates. Douglas makes it very clear that he is not taking a stance on slavery for himself but rather showing that the people should make this decision for themselves. He says, “It is no answer to this argument to say that slavery is an evil, and hence should not be tolerated. You must allow the people to decide for themselves whether it is a good or an evil” (Lincoln Douglas Debates, 28). These are only a few examples of the firm argument that Douglas continually takes on the issue of slavery in the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The first of the two sources to be examined here is Allen Guelzo's House Divided: Lincoln, Douglas, and the Political Landscape of 1858. This source takes a more technical examination of not just the speeches and overall influence of Lincoln during this time, but also on where politics stood around the middle of the nineteenth century. This allows the book to feel somewhat modern in that it has a comprehensive amount of knowledge on the subject while also feeling historical in the sense that it has a large number of personal reports and information that make the piece feel as if it were more authentic. Therefore, in order to better understand this source as well as the second source which will be examined later, it is necessary to take a closer look at it. To begin with, this source takes a more critical examination at the Lincoln-Douglas race from the perspective of the complex…

    • 2052 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apush Dbq Tension

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When Jefferson purchased the Louisiana Territory in 1803, the elephant in the room was how the newfound windfall of land would be implemented in the United States of America. By 1820 the issue had come to the forefront of politics, the North didn’t want slavery to expand, and the South was in opposition. Eventually, Henry Clay came up with the Missouri Compromise, which for the time being resolved the tension. Rising tension became a trend throughout Manifest Destiny and the rest of the Antebellum period. In the period circa 1845-1861, the various issues and compromises made both sides angry at the other, therefore propelling the Civil War into existence.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Lincoln was not a well known politician when he was running for Senate, he became known more when he began challenging Douglas to debates. Lincoln opposed the idea of expanding slavery. During a speech at Alton, Illinois, he argued that slavery not only impacts politics, but also many religions, literature, and morals. He reasoned that, slavery divided the society “Is it not this same mighty, deep-seated power that somehow operates on the minds of men, exciting and stirring them up in every avenue of society – in politics, in religion, in literature, in morals, in all manifold relations in life?” (Document G).…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The issue of how much and to what extent rights extend to slaves was a reoccurring topic in the political sphere leading up to and following the Civil War, especially during the debates of 1858 between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas. Stephen Douglas was strongly in favor of slavery and launched a series of inflammatory remarks to paint Lincoln as an abolitionist and a black sympathizer. Despite the fiery rhetoric, Lincoln speaks to the fact that slavery isn’t an issue of the federal government meddling in states’ rights, but rather defending the natural, human rights granted to all. Lincoln speaks on the Dred Scott decision, the tyrannizing effects of the majorities in terms of slavery being a state’s rights issue, and how although the Declaration of Independence does not speak in direct terms about the social and political equalities blacks possessed, they didn’t foresee blacks remaining in a static social state.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    President Abraham Lincoln flirtation with African- American Civil Rights, John Wilkes Booths undying love for the confederacy, and the ultimate fall of the Confederate army. Independently, each of these points hold little weight of importance, but together these three points created a fire storm lasting close to six years, costing more than 620,000 Americans lives, and two faiths’ that will ultimately be entwined with each in the history book. A collision of two people that will be forever attach with each other in the history book a faith where you can’t talk about one without talking about the other. In this essay, we will discuss each of these points; Booth passion toward the Confederacy, the fall of the Confederate army, and Lincoln wanting…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Brown Dbq Essay

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This claim drew a political wedge among the Democratic and the developed Republican Party that Lincoln was a part of. The abolitionist perspective of the North attributed to their growing hostility towards the southerner’s ideals about slavery as shown in Lincoln’s denouncement of southern ideals. Frederick Douglass, a free African-American author, reminisced about his relationship with John Brown and how he respected him very much, so much to claim that it is an “honor to ourselves in doing and honor to him, for it implies the possession of qualities akin to his” (F). Frederick’s heightened respect for Brown stems from Brown’s purpose of his cause. John Brown sought to free slaves in his attack on Harpers Ferry.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It wasn’t until the presidential election of 1860 that the issue of slavery was freely debated upon between candidates. This topic was debated upon in a series of debates between the republican candidate Abraham Lincoln and the northern democratic candidate Stephen Douglas. It was from these debates that the term and use of Lincoln-Douglas Debates originated. However, it was during these debates that Abraham Lincoln ambitions to abolish slavery came to be known by all and feared by virtually all southerners. In response, the south vowed to secede from the union if Abraham Lincoln did in fact become elected to be the president of the united states.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Douglas addressed Lincoln’s opinion in his speech. He was happy to get an answer from Lincoln about african americans citizenship and eligibility for office. (“Fourth Debate: Charleston, Illinois.” National Parks Service. Lincoln’s first speech, paragraph 1 and Douglas’ response speech, paragraph 1) Lincoln lost the election for the Senate seat of Illinois to Douglas but would later beat him in the Presidential Election of 1860.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Radical and the Republican by James Oakes is a historical retelling about the struggle of two men, Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass, to put an end to slavery and the formation of their partnership that led to the ending of slavery. Both men came from vastly different backgrounds, but both strongly believed that slaves should be emancipated and given the benefits from their hard labor. However, in the beginning, their similarities ended there and they were not willing to be friends nor partners. Oakes argues that things could not remain this way due to the need for the passionate reformation and impulsive nature of Douglass paired with the practical political leadership that was exemplified by Lincoln were needed to finally liberate…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Abraham Lincoln Dbq

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Lee were some of Lincoln’s opponents. Robert E. Lee was the general of the Confederate army and a strong believer in slavery. Stephen Douglas was a politician who designed the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which allowed states to decide for themselves if they want to remain a state with slavery or become a free state (Historynet). Douglas, while running against Lincoln for senator, also led campaigns against Lincoln saying that Lincoln would “make slaves of white man and free man of black slaves” and that the goal of Lincoln and the Whigs was “to make the negro the equal of the white man” (Blumenthal…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lincoln’s Shadow: Reconstruction in Postwar South The Reconstruction of the South remains, to this day, one of the most dividing topics amongst historians, dunces and anything in the between. It is capable of sparking passionate debates, yet incapable of ushering in change, as America can thankfully remind itself that Reconstruction has long since passed. Although some changes may have behooved the period, their literal implication is out of the question. Instead, the focus of the controversy is simply the era in retrospect; theoretical change.…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Slavery makes it necessary for the slaveholder to commit all conceivable outrages upon the miserable slave. It is impossible to hold the slaves in bondage without this. ”(182). Douglass professed…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In his essay, Guelzo mentioned how Enlightenment changed the ideology of Lincoln such as “his unquestioning belief in universal natural rights” (Guelzo, 353). Additionally, his background with the “hard-shell” Separate Baptists (Guelzo, 356) and Calvinism made him a determined person to help end slavery. Guelzo quoted the speech that Lincoln gave in 1858: “I hate it because of the monstrous injustice of slavery itself ” (Guelzo, 354). Though it is not stated explicitly, Lincoln made this comment to signify his opposition. Guelzo provided an insight of how time played a huge role in the abolition process.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A slave must be a man if he is seen as “moral, intellectual, and responsible” enough to avoid committing any of the seventy-two crimes punishable by death. All throughout his speech, it is evident that Douglas relies on simple logic and common sense to prove his points. For example, Douglas points out that if he were to ask any man if slavery was wrong, they would say yes. In addition to this, if he were to ask a man if they wanted to be a slave, they would say no. Additionally, Douglas uses God and the Bible as part of his argument.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He urges the audience to fulfill what the country advocated by their founding fathers. He further condones the nation for their cruel hypocrisy. He states that “Your Fourth of July is a sham; your boasted liberty, an unholy license… Your shouts of liberty and equality, hollow mockery.” Douglass also uses his personal experience of enslavement to retort to the people who oppose the idea of abolition. He reasons by asking how could people allow to impose to others such a horrid condition that no one would impose on themselves?…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays