He is, therefore, revealing that God is the only way out of the plague once it is ‘appointed’ to them. Camus draws attentions to the absurdity of religion by displaying the lack of a realistic sense of Father Paneloux’ revelations. Furthermore, his convictions weaken as he witnesses the unjustful suffering of an innocent child. Father Paneloux exclaimed ‘in a voice hoarse, but clearly audible across that nameless, neverending wail: “My God, spare this child”’ (217). The suffering of an innocent child awakens and evokes the beliefs of Father Paneloux. Through his sincere grieving, it can be concluded that he personally believes that an innocent child does not, in fact, deserve such suffering. The tone of his voice, as indicated through his interjection: “My God, spare this child!”, indirectly questions God’s reasoning behind innocent suffering. Therefore, Camus reiterates the absurdity of religion by passively exhibiting the irrationality of tribulation. However, despite the drastic self-revelation regarding his beliefs, he continues to justify his religious practices. Father Paneloux admits that the “agony of a child [is] humiliating to the heart and to the mind”, but “since it was God’s will, [they], too should will it” (255). Although his core
He is, therefore, revealing that God is the only way out of the plague once it is ‘appointed’ to them. Camus draws attentions to the absurdity of religion by displaying the lack of a realistic sense of Father Paneloux’ revelations. Furthermore, his convictions weaken as he witnesses the unjustful suffering of an innocent child. Father Paneloux exclaimed ‘in a voice hoarse, but clearly audible across that nameless, neverending wail: “My God, spare this child”’ (217). The suffering of an innocent child awakens and evokes the beliefs of Father Paneloux. Through his sincere grieving, it can be concluded that he personally believes that an innocent child does not, in fact, deserve such suffering. The tone of his voice, as indicated through his interjection: “My God, spare this child!”, indirectly questions God’s reasoning behind innocent suffering. Therefore, Camus reiterates the absurdity of religion by passively exhibiting the irrationality of tribulation. However, despite the drastic self-revelation regarding his beliefs, he continues to justify his religious practices. Father Paneloux admits that the “agony of a child [is] humiliating to the heart and to the mind”, but “since it was God’s will, [they], too should will it” (255). Although his core