The Peloponnesian War: The Corinth War

Improved Essays
“He would charge both the Athenians and the Lacedaemonians with utter madness, not only because we risk our lives fighting as we do over trifles when we might enjoy in security a wealth of possessions, but also because we continually impoverish our own territory…” This was the warning cry of one of the great Athenian rhetoricians Isocrates. It was his belief that the unification of the Greek city-states would be the only prosperous route. Their current state of disarray made them willing targets to invading forces and would lead them to their ultimate destruction. So why is it that the Greeks were never able to unify despite the urgings of rhetoricians and the impending doom that was waiting for them? One of the only prominent times that the Greek city-states found a particular unification was during the time of the Persian Wars. Athens and Sparta were able to put aside their differences and unite for the common cause of defeating the Persian armies. Yet as time progressed they were unable to allow one to have more power than the other, ultimately leading to the Peloponnesian Wars in the years 431 - 404 BCE. Sparta gained control of much of the power after this war, …show more content…
The Corinth War appears as one of the first conflicts that would further drive Sparta away from other members of Greece. Sparta and the Peloponnesian League faced Athens, Thebes, Corinth, and Argos. Due to Athenian successes the Persians feared they would once again become too powerful so they pulled away and gave aid to the Spartans. This abrupt switch led to the King’s Peace in 387/6, which outlined numerous stipulations, though the one that would most affect Greek unification was “eleutheria kai autonomia” or the free and autonomous clause. The Greek cities were prohibited from uniting lest they incur the wrath of the Persians or their new muscle

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    National unity of purpose was replaced by resentment, and serious conflict with Sparta emerged. The three-decade Peloponnesian Wars eventuated (431-404 BCE), and Athenian democracy was replaced and reinstated at intervals during the ebbs and…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Vth century, after the Persian wars, there were in Greece two major factions: Athenian Empire and Peloponnesian League, with Sparta in front. Athens and Sparta had some frictions, but largely no total war engagement…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Sparta and Athens people were very different people in many different ways. Sparta kept to itself and provided military assistance only if it were needed. The Athens, were very controlling and wanted to take over and control all surrounding land. This difference lead to the war between all Greeks called the Peloponnesian War which after many years of vigurously fighting, Sparta won but refused to burn down the Athens. Sparta let the Athens live on as long as they promised not to try to control or rule over the other Greeks.…

    • 91 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    As a result, the athens population grew. The peloponnesians which were lead by the spartans were alarmed. A 30 year treaty was conducted between athens and the spartans right after spartans first 15 year…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the Corinthian War, Sparta gained power, as the Persians, afraid of Athens resurging, gave Sparta control over Greece. This control made Sparta arrogant, causing it to attack Thebes and seize it. Sparta was then even more arrogant and attacked Athens. However, Athens was able to resist. This attempt on Athens caused Athens and Thebes to team up against Sparta.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to achieve these objectives, Athens imposed additional war taxes on their allied subordinate states to which many of them refused to pay but did out of fear. At the same time, Athens broke trust agreements with its allied subordinate and coastal states by occupying their lands, placing many them into slavery and killing those who opposed. The new aggressive strategic approach by Athens shifted the balance of power of the war in their favor as they mastered the art of fighting on land. But greed, pride, and overconfidence consumed them and denied Sparta’s request for peace and the war…

    • 1108 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 400 B.C.’s there was a war in greece. Persia was a neighbor to the greek people but they weren’t a good neighbor. They were greece’s enemy. The greeks enemy was the persian empire that wanted to take all of the land in greece and rule the land. The main reason the war happened was that the ionians which was greeks on the coastline of turkey were tired of being on the edge of the persians so they the burned the capital or hometown of persia.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While the Greek City states were normally independent and autonomous from each other, the increasing Persian threat, and the subsequent invasion of mainland Greece, the city states formed…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two authors from classical Greece and ancient Rome believe that a fundamental part of human nature is to desire and seek power, whether be it from money, strength or knowledge. They agree that having too much power changes people’s decisions and clouds their judgment. The Greek historian of the Peloponnesian War, Thucydides, describes a connection between power and justice in his book The Peloponnesian War. He gives evidence that having too much power and the desire for more overrules personal morals and principles of justice. The Roman satirist named Juvenal, on the other hand, believes that desiring too much power brings suffering, which eventually leads to human downfall.…

    • 1792 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This was an ancient Greek war fought by the Delian League led by Athens against the Peloponnesian League led by Sparta. The Peloponnesian War reshaped the ancient Greek world. Athens, the strongest society in Greece before the war's beginning, was reduced to a weak city-state, while Sparta became established as the leading power of Greece. The Melians stayed that they were neutral in this war, they were neither allies, nor foes of Athens or Sparta. However, Athens did not agree to these terms, so they told the Melians to choose them, or the Spartans, and the Melians stuck by their decision.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In early fifth century B.C.E, the Greeks constantly suffered from the threat of being conquered by the Persian Empire. Although Persian power vastly exceeded, the Greeks unexpectedly triumphed. Similar to the tale of David versus Goliath, the Greeks defeated the Persians due to divine support and Greek unity. The threat of the Persian Empire expansion into Greece and the imminent possibility that they would lose their freedom and become slaves to the Persians, so horrified the Greeks that they united together and risked their lives in order to preserve the one thing they all shared in common, their "Greekness".…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Melian Argument Analysis

    • 1866 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In Thucydides, the Melians argued that by going against them, they would make enemies of all the neutral states, “When they see what you are doing here they will expect an attack on themselves before long (5.98).” They finish their statement by talking about how this would only serve to increase their existing enemy’s strength, and make enemies out of people that were not their enemies before (5.98). This statement reflects on the fact that they had to threaten the Athenians through other people’s actions and not through their own, proving that they could not stand alone. The argument solely depends on the fact that other neutral Greek states would actually become alarmed and revolt. There is an extreme reliance on the fact that they needed to depend on these outside powers and not on themselves.…

    • 1866 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peloponnesian War Analysis

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Athenian War Strategy: Peloponnesian War Thucydides described the 21 years long history of the Peloponnesian War (431-411BC), between an alliance of Spartans and Athenian, the powerful city state of ancient Greece (war formally ended in 404 BC). This war was the result Athenian rising power because ‘the rise of new power always create uncertainty and anxieties' . Athenian and her alliance dramatically increased their power after thirty years’ peace treaty. Both alliances "refused to give up their position under the pressure of three of the strongest motives, fear, honor, and interest. For war, Fear was the motive for Sparta whereas, honor and interest were on the Athenian side.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Peloponnesian Wars

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Peloponnesian Wars were actually three separate wars; the first period of the war is referred to as the Archidamian between 431 and 421 BC. The Spartan leader Archidamus’ wanted to lure the Athenians into a land battle this contrasted to Pericles, who wanted to avoid this at all costs and wanted to rely on their navy. Sparta was on the back foot in this stage of the war and were out of their depth fighting battle predominantly at sea. Sparta eventually won some battles and some of Athens’ allies in the North began to revolt led to a peace treaty being signed in 421 BC known as the Peace of Nicias. According to Greek historian from the time period, Plutarch the Peace of Nicias was weighted heavily in the Athenians favor due to the fact that it returned conquered lands and prisoners of war to Athens.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Greece's geography was a large contributor to the lack of unification before 338 B.C. Because Greece is very mountainous and is separated by many rivers and other water bodies, the city-states that developed were geographically isolated and had little interaction with one another. Lack of communications led to the development of fierce rivalries between neighboring city-states. Without any reason to unite, the city-states stayed separate and continued to war with one another. However, when Philip II of Macedonia attempted to unite and take control of Greece, he became a common enemy for the Greek city-states to unite against. However, despite the alliances formed between the Greeks, Philip II was able to conquer Greece and unified the rest…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays