A war has the imminent consequence, the death of civilians who have nothing to do with war, …show more content…
Regardless of the final outcome of a war, the ecological environment surrounding the combat zone is permanently affected, causing a long period of time to be impossible to inhabit or cultivate the affected region. This causes in the short and long term the forced movement of people to other urban centers that are not prepared to receive new people, with the social problems that entails. Likewise, the vegetation and animal population affected by the combat zone is often destroyed or reduced to zero, with the environmental impact that this causes. This happens more with the atomic bombs that can leave the affected place inavitable. The production, testing, transport and use of these advanced weapons are perhaps the most destructive effects of war on the environment. Although its use has been strictly limited since the bombing of Japan by the US military. At the end of World War II, military analysts have serious concerns about the proliferation of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. (Take the current Syrian conflict as an …show more content…
Historically, it has been shown that wars are cyclical and are usually motivated by the negative outcome of an earlier war and for the same reasons as the original war. This causes that the country that today is attacked, in some time becomes an aggressor country. The clearest example of this is in European history from 1850 to the present. Since then great wars have been unleashed which, fundamentally, are motivated by the same original conflict. This could be a possibility more than we can not be one hundred percent sure. Currently the Civil War in Syria is going for a sixth consecutive year and when this war is over, it may be that the Syrian government rises and becomes the aggressor or Start a war against those who caused so many deaths and