The Importance Of The Writ Of Habeas Corpus

Great Essays
Can you envision what the United States would be like without the Writ of Habeas Corpus? That being said, the "Bill of Rights" which is the initial ten alterations in the United States Constitution would be stripped away and our country would disintegrate. The Bill of Rights ensures the American individuals and their common freedoms against the administration that may encroach upon the privileges of the individuals. At the end of the day, the Bill of Rights restrains the administration's energy, and this is the reason our "Establishing Fathers accepted Habeas Corpus because it is so vital in protecting our freedom, equity, and majority rules system which is stated in the first article of the constitution. In this paper, I will impart the importance …show more content…
Habeas Corpus actually signifies "you have the body" It is a formal composed request (writ), requiring that a prisoner be brought before the court to determine whether the government has the right to continue detaining them. Article one of the constitution says, that the writ of habeas corpus can only be suspended “in cases of rebellion or invasion of public safety. For the American individuals the writ just means you have the right to be heard or the right to due procedure before being indicted of any demonstrations of wrongdoing. This incorporates comprehending what the charges are against you, being educated of your rights and having lawful representation; if you cannot afford the cost of a lawyer one will be given by the state. Today, the writ is basically utilized for detained people within state detainment facilities who feel their rights were damaged by the state, which implies they can make a request and seek Habeas Corpus. This incredible writ of freedom helps in securing our individual freedoms and has been around way before the Constitution was …show more content…
Congress appears to have no concern toward administering anything towards managing counter terrorism issues as they identify with Habeas Corpus. With all due respect to the adversary soldiers or unlawful warriors, it is my individual theory to agree with the methodology, which would be that of the Bush Administration. I don't agree it should be optional depending upon who is President at any given time, yet today that appears to be the way things are. Anybody, who has discussed any demonstrations of terrorism, should not hope to be protected by the American individuals, nor by the constitution and the Writ of Habeas Corpus, particularly since those were the very things did the terrorists long to annihilate in any case. With all due admiration, for the profit of the prisoners and their trouble we ought to utilize the laws inside the nations they existed in, in particular, Shari law, which they all see obviously and they would all get justice by a decapitating in an open square. Luckily, for them our nation has not embraced such unethical law and we live in an acculturated society. Our nation is isolated on numerous issues and Habeas Corpus which identifies with foe warriors and unlawful soldiers needs to be tended to by

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Throughout all of American history, no other document has maintained an equally important and ever changing role in our government than the United States Constitution. The Constitution drew the plans for the creation the three branches of government and provided the structure on which the national government would grow. The most famous aspect of the Constitution is the Bill of Rights. Written by James Madison as a response to the States’ demands that individual liberties be provided and protected, the Bill of Rights serves to establish the personal rights of every man in America. Among these rights are the right to counsel, which is preserved in the Sixth Amendment, and the right to not withstand or be subjected to cruel or unusual punishment,…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His request to speak with his lawyer while being questioned by police was repeatedly denied. The Court held that the denial of Escobedo’s right to counsel contributed to his confession, making it invalid as evidence, emphasizing the importance of protecting the rights of individuals during police questioning (Doc 6). Similarly, in Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court established the famous “Miranda rights,” which require law enforcement officials to inform individuals of their constitutional rights before questioning them in police custody. This case involved Miranda, who confessed to a crime during police interrogation without being informed of his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination. The Court ruled that Miranda’s confession was obtained in violation of his constitutional rights and established the now-familiar Miranda warning to protect individuals’ rights during police interrogation (Doc 7).…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first amendment of the Bill of Rights includes freedom of speech, right to petition, assembly, religion and freedom of expression. The Bill of rights was created for the anti-federalists who didn’t want to ratify the constitution because it didn’t directly state the rights of citizens. In 1735 there was a court case, Crown vs John Peter Zenger, that brought John…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamdi's Arguments

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Also stated that congress can calm the protections where the demand of war prevents that and it must occur under the constitution’s suspension clause under article 1 section 9 and clause 2. Lastly, if civil rights are to be reduced during wartime, it must be done openly and as the constitution requires rather than silently through the opinions of the court. In Justice Thomas’s dissenting judgment, it is stated that there is no reason to remand the case and that the habeas claim should fail because the executive branch had acted through the president’s constitutional powers in which the president had declared Hamdi as an enemy combatant and that Hamdi should be detained. Justice Thomas states that the federal government’s power should not be balanced by the court, and the plurality fails to address the government’s…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Because of this, a question arose from the frenzy: Did the president have the power to overrule a habeas corpus writ that had been issued by a state judge? In his book, Neely cites that the administration had “a clear-cut precedent”, the case of Ableman v. Booth(1859). In this particular case a state court’s writ of habeas corpus for a…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bill Of Rights Dbq

    • 1873 Words
    • 8 Pages

    While the Constitution was well written, it lacked the protection of human rights. Even though they did not want too give too much power to the people, it was important to protect their rights should the government try and take them away. The Bill of Rights, of the first ten amendments to the constitution were then drafted. “By early 1789, even Madison had come to agree that some sort of bill of rights was essential legitimize the new government in the eyes of its opponents” (Brinkley 108). This Bill of Rights would ease opposition to the new Constitution, as people would feel assured that they were not being taken advantage of and still had their natural rights.…

    • 1873 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bill Of Rights Dbq

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When the American Congress finally ratified the Constitution in place of the Articles of Confederation in 1788, a new three-branch government was created. This government served as a compromise between federal powers and state powers, and its system of checks and balances helped prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful. However, the process toward ratification required 9 out of 13 states to agree, and concerns over an autocratic federal power led to the formation of the Bill of Rights. Although the Bill of Rights were intended to protect liberties won in the American Revolution, the reasoning behind these amendments reflected America’s deeply ingrained fear of governmental tyranny.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If you ask the average American citizen to name all the Bill of Rights many would be stumped. As important as the Bill of Rights are many Americans are oblivious to the protections the individual rights provide. This was evident in the case of Miranda v. Arizona. In this case, government officials were physically and psychologically abusing suspects and coercing defendants into guilt during custodial interrogation. The court consolidated several cases which showed signs of government abuse and the Warren Court decided in a 5-4 ruling to apply procedural safeguards to the state.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In America, people have certain freedoms that cannot be infringed upon by the government, and they are liberties that some people from other countries are not entitled to have. These unalienable rights of the American people are specifically stated in the Bill of Rights found in the U.S. Constitution. In 1789, a year after the Constitution was ratified, a draft of the Bill of Rights was proposed, and it contained ten amendments, which would be added to the Constitution. In 1789, the Bill of Rights was finally ratified and resolved the huge debate between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. One of their debates was over the necessity of the bill, which the Federalists, such as Alexander Hamilton, believed it unnecessary to write it on the…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The U.S. Constitution was enacted to ensure that any citizen, who was accused of a crime, would receive fair and equal due process. More specifically, the U.S. Constitution’s procedural rights are defined by the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendment of the Bill of Rights. These Amendments only reflect a portion of the Constitution’s Bill of Rights however, they are important to the Criminal Justice System because they outline a standard procedure that the government must follow during the entire course of any criminal case. In doing so, both the innocent and guilty are protected from any indiscriminate or arbitrary misuse of the law from the courts, law enforcement and any other member of the judicial system. To preserve certain rights of the citizens, the Fourth Amendment protects…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Virginia Declaration of Rights declared that life, liberty, and property were basic rights and that “all men are by nature equally free and independent” (Keene, 122). These early declaration of rights made clear the limits of authority before the actual creation of the structure of government (Keene, 122). The Massachusetts Constitution is the oldest continuously functioning written constitution in the world (Keene, 124). The Massachusetts Constitution was special. A special convention was put together to draft the Constitution and afterward it was sent to the people for ratification.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first ten amendments are especially important, and our lives would be very different without them. For example, the fourth amendment prevents the government from arresting people, searching their homes or their person, or confiscating their belongings without a warrant issued on reasonable grounds. Without this important amendment, the government could arrest people without due cause. The eighth amendment prevents the government from imposing excessive bail. Without the eighth amendment, the government could unfairly impose excessive bail on whomever they please, to prevent them from leaving jail before their trial.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    lastly their First Amendment Right (i.e., free discourse and religion), but only to the degree that the activity of those rights don't meddle with their status as detainees.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The enlightenment was a time during the 18th century where there was a major change in the way people think of politics, philosophy, science, and communications. Hobbes was a philosopher during the time who had his own opinion on government. Hobbes philosophy on government make the most sense. Hobbes government prevents wars and stops arguments from happening. Hobbes government structure prevents arguments between people by having the government give them orders.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays