Truth And Knowledge In Christian Philosophy

I have been told that a professor of philosophy once said that in the middle ages, there were two rules: one being that the Church was always right; and that two, if in doubt, refer to rule number one. When thinking about this philosophically, we can imagine that if this professor was a theologian, not much would be able to be said as far as its relation to philosophy goes due to the fact that most Christian philosophers believed that philosophy and theology were synonymous. As to whether or not these assertions are correct, the best step we can take to understanding the rule being discussed is the attempt to find the context of what it actually means to refer to the Church when one is in doubt.

For starters, stating that the Church is always …show more content…
Incidentally, it would seem to be required to presuppose that God is subject to human observation and discernment keeping in mind the end goal to presuppose the very data we get as from a type of knowledge in any case. If we somehow managed to take a gander at this from a metaphysical perspective, we can see that adding ontology and epistemology into faith (not including rationale and logic) gives a viewpoint concerning understanding religious philosophy, along with faith itself. All of what I have stated so far is of course debatable. Additionally, comprehensive of an arrangement of morals, insightful or philosophical thought would likewise rely on a religious methodology in light of the fact that anything outside the commandments of God can 't be demonstrated unless it is combined with the comprehension of God. I will state again that all of what I have explained so far is of course …show more content…
The distinction in semantics does make a difference since it makes a more profound contention when endeavoring to locate a consistent, and phonetic assention while talking about conclusions, or contentions. Without being essentially religious, or even spiritually, I myself find that seeking knowledge to reason one truth from a key truth is essential. To be specific, in the event that I go to a cleric to talk about the nature of phenomena, however I don 't trust him, it doesn 't as a matter of course need to do with an inclination, or an assumption, but might actually be because of a consistent irregularity in either his, or my own particular legitimate comprehension of what is being