Withholding Evidence In Court Cases

Superior Essays
When ethics and the law begin to mix, things start to get messy. In life ethics are a part of your moral compass; they are what you live by and they tell you what’s right from wrong. Currently in my city, there is a scandal going on that involves ethics and legality. Our district attorney, John Budelmann, was found to be withholding information from certain drug cases. As a prosecutor, you must provide the criminals with all evidence that they can use for their defense. Although if the prosecutors are not given full evidence by the district attorney, then the criminals cannot receive all the evidence to help them in their case. When his assistant district attorney, Jeffery Domachowski, found out Budelmann was withholding information, Budelmann fired him for not going along …show more content…
In many cases, because evidence was withheld, many of the defendants began to get overcharged. In one case a man was almost sent to prison for twenty-five years to life. To stop this, Domachowski didn’t obey Budelmann’s order to withhold evidence, and the man only got two years for acting as an agent in the drug deal. An agent being a less serious charge than an actual drug dealer, therefore they wouldn’t get as much time. It was found that in six other cases information that was withheld proved that the defendant was the agent and not the dealer. This was one of the first strikes Budelmann took against Domachowski for going against his orders. Domachowski then began to warn defense lawyers that Budelmann may not give them all the evidence needed to have a true case. Budelmann decided that this was the last straw and made Domachowski resign in June. Budelmann had said he fired Domachowski for his own ethical misconduct, but Budelmann did not release what that was about. Now, Domachowski is coming out and making it known that what Budelmann is doing is not

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Four attorneys from Bergen County New Jersey, previously barred to practice law, were charged with alleged misuse of clients’ funds and unauthorized practice of law. The attorneys were arrested following complaints triggered by civilians and based on information from the New Jersey Office of Attorney Ethics. Lawrence Jaskot from Lodi who was disbarred in January of 2014 is accused of taking more than $75,000 from his attorney’s trust account for personal expenses. Leonard Adoff, another disbarred attorney, allegedly used $73,000 from an attorney trust account to pay off illegal gambling debts. Jonathan Greenman, another continued to practice law after his license was suspended and received money related to a real-estate matter than he never…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Upl Law Case Study

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For any temporarily suspended lawywer, disbarred, or non lincesed attorney in the state of California, that is license in antoher state may not practice law. If they continue to offer any adivc, representation, make court appearances, and draft legal documents of any kind of legal matter as it would relate to a particular case law for a client. They would be in violation of UPL. advising an individual on law and legal matters as it relates to a particular case being presented at the time. If anyone should advise a person on the legal recourse and how the law applies to them, they will be inviolation of UPL.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea-bargaining is an important process in the criminal justice system and are used to prevent lengthy trials. It is defined as “the process of negotiating a guilty plea involving either charge bargaining, where the prosecutor will offer to reduce the severity of the charges or the number of counts in exchange for a guilty plea, or sentence bargaining, where the prosecutor will agree to recommend leniency at the sentencing stage” (Hemmens, Brody, & Spohn, 2013). However, there are both pros and cons with plea-bargaining. One reason why plea-bargaining is an advantage to the court system is because it helps to relieve caseloads since the prosecutor’s workload decreases when a defendant takes the bargain. Also, when a defendant goes this route,…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Rod Blagojevich Case

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The case that I am researching is the Rod Blagojevich case. Rod Blagojevich was the 40th governor of Illinois from 2003 - 2009. He was charged with corruption by Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald. The case was criminal case and was originally heard in a court in Illinois, but later was brought to an appellate court. Along with corruption, Rod was also charged with solicitation of bribes in exchange for Barack Obama's vacant Senate seat, mail fraud, attempting to bribe the Chicago Tribune with state funds, and abuse of power in attempting to gain campaign contributions from Children's Memorial Hospital.…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cousin Vinny Ethics

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the practice of law ethics are a fundamental and necessary part of the practice. According to Merriam-Webster, Ethics are defined as “rules of behavior based on ideas about what is morally good and bad.” Theatrics are ethical in the courtroom because they contribute to the overall narrative of either the defense or the prosecution. Theatrics have to do with every aspect of the courtroom from the actors to the costumes and from the stage to the audience.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The congressman case is really fascinating for me as I read your comments. Like Saul Gellerman wrote:"How does honest, intelligent,compassionate human being act in a ways that are callous, dishonest and wrong headed ". No matter how many training human go thru about ethics, there will be always questions about human…

    • 52 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the biggest issues concerning the criminal justice system is corruption. This corruption can lead the corrupted to personal gain at great expense to others and sometimes can be directly or indirectly, eventually causing harm to others as well. Corruption can be defined as “the exploit the powers of law enforcement in return for considering of private-regarding benefit and that violate formal standards governing his or her conduct” (William & Arrigo, 2012, p. 96). Furthermore, police officers have been put in situations where particular leverage can be easily generated through unethical and illegal means. The idea of corruption of can pertains to the film, “The Departed”, which involves a two police detectives, one who commits crimes…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    The multiple dimensions of tunnel vision in criminal cases. Wisconsin Law Review, 2 Garrett, B. L. (2008) ‘Judging innocence’. Columbia Law Review, 55-14 Gohara, M. (2006) ‘A lie for a lie: False confessions and the case for reconsidering the legality of deceptive interrogation techniques’.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Brilliant Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Michael Morton Court Case

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Throughout the years people have claimed and argued their position towards a big question. Although the simple truth thesis states that big questions admit simple, obvious, and undisputable answers this is not true. Big questions never admit straightforward and unquestionable answers. A big question can be anything from What is Life? to Is capital punishment wrong?…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American criminal justice system enforces our laws and keeps watch over us but who is watching over the system? Oversight over the system may after all, be less than optimal going by various criminal cases tainted by prosecutorial misconduct resulting in wrongful convictions. From law enforcement, the elected officials, the court system, to corrections, prosecutorial misconduct gained notoriety because of the absolute immunity they enjoy. According to Silverglate, (2000), “We now live in a time of sharply decreasing faith in the criminal justice system.” This decreasing faith might not be unconnected to the egregiously bad behavior that dots the criminal justice landscape.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These cases show that confessions are not always prompted by internal knowledge or actual guilt, but are sometimes motivated by external influences. If they argue the money = innocence standpoint, use “bad lawyering” instead. The resources of the justice system are often stacked against poor defendants. Matters only become worse when a person is represented by an ineffective, incompetent or overburdened defense lawyer.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Often, statements from people with incentives to testify — particularly incentives that are not disclosed to the jury — are the central evidence in convicting an innocent person. The registry itself, which looks deeply into 873 specific cases of wrongful conviction, examined cases based on court documents as well as from groups that have long documented wrongful convictions. That group of wrongfully convicted spent more than 10,000 total years in prison, according to the report, with an average of 11 years…

    • 2703 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Under the Crime Control Model, as Packer described it, defense counsel was considered a luxury, or worse, an impediment to efficient processing of the guilty. By contrast, under the Due Process Model, as we have seen, defense counsel was the key to asserting and protecting the defendant‘s rights” (Keith p.43). The techniques of extending…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Police Emotivism

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Crime Control Name: Institution Affiliation: Date: Crime Control How Emotivism Can Be Used To Understand the Perspective of All Parties except the Student If the practice is approved, emotivism can be used to understand the point of view of all the parties that include the police and the prostitutes. Emotivism notes that moral utterances lack the truth value and only expresses the feelings and emotional worth of the person talking. It, thus, can be used to understand the perspective of the police because they disregard moral in reaching the decisions they react at. For example, they failed to stop and question the women prostitutes.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the court asked the District Attorney’s office if this informant was used before they lied and said…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays