Animal Testing And Ethics

Superior Essays
Scientists, when it comes to responsibility, will take credit when something helps people, but not when something kills a lot of people. If people’s tax dollars are paying for something, people do have a right to say what is being done with your tax money. Most scientists, if you ask them, will say that they have ethics. What they usually mean, according to Miller in lecture, is the legal thing. The law simply states what you can or can not do. It is just a piece of paper, more or less. Ethics is deeper than that, ethics and morality regard what you should and should not do. So most scientists follow laws and do not do anything illegal, but when it comes to ethics they will do anything to get research done. One of the big problem is lack of …show more content…
Josef Mengele was found but protected by the United States because he had very valuable research. He was good-looking, normal, and his main drive was intellectual curiosity. Mengele was told that he was able to do anything, and so he did it. That is a problem. Japan did it too in World War II, in unit 731. They were protected again, by the Americans, because they wanted the research. This is part of lack of empathy. A lot of scientists can use this to experiment on animals. Serial killers start out as people who like to hurt animals. Most people do not like animal cruelty. But if it is behind a wall in a lab, it is okay. This is a contradiction in society. Some would argue that the ends justifies the means. The Tuskegee Experiments is known to be an example for the concept of “Rights”. During this experiment, the U.S. Public Health Service took a group of poor black people and used them as guinea pigs in syphilis experiment. They had black doctors and nurses who cooperated for the good of science. They lied to people saying that they had a cure, in order to study them. This is an example of a lack of informed consent. There are many examples of scientists doing this, such as medical experiments. There are also human trials. It is a question of consent. One thing we all notice is that all these scientists say the same thing: “We just wanted to find the results of the experiment. We were just doing science.” These people are normal people, not mentally sick. In human psychology, there is group psychology. When we act in a group, we tend to follow the group. So if everyone is experimenting on humans in a group, you will likely be pulled to follow the group. People also follow authority. “I only work here, my boss was telling me what to do.” There is the bystander effect. People will say, “If I saw someone in danger, I’d help them”, but it is not true. Most people will just look at around and

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    When there’s only one person in an emergency they feel like they have to help since there’s no one else to and the blame and burden would be too great if they didn’t help. For this…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Overall, scientists put more significance on the scientific experiment versus a human life. In the study, there were 399 syphilis subjects and 201 non-syphilis subjects, mostly consisting of illiterate blacks. Scientists thought illiterate blacks were fit for the study due to their vulnerability and lack of knowledge. At the time, numerous whites viewed black’s as persons that do not contribute to society which considered them to be less important. During the study, doctors lied to both participants making them believe they were…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Henrietta wasn’t the first African-American to be tested and researched, in the case of which, Skloot relayed information about a study at the Tuskegee Institute, “They recruited hundreds of African-American men with syphilis, then watched them die slow, painful, and preventable deaths, even after they realized penicillin could cure them” (Skloot 50). Medical research mainly focused on minorities in the early to middle twentieth century, with this in mind, these studies were where the immorality was rooted. Not to mention, to bring ill men in for the sole purpose of watching them die seemed pure evil. This study, along with hundreds of others, brought about the reason why African-Americans could no longer trust their doctors and hospitals. After Henrietta’s cells had been exposed to the world, a virologist by the name of Chester Southam began his own study of cancer research, “He repeated this process with about a dozen other cancer patients.…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In studying the essay “Racism and Research: The Case of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study” written by Allan M. Brandt, it is easy to conclude that the Tuskegee study was founded entirely off racism in the medical community and had no real relevance in the study of syphilis at the experiments’ conclusion. It became something much more useful to psychologists and sociologists to understand the “pathology of racism” rather than the “pathology of syphilis.” (Brandt, 1978, p. 21) The experiment led to the senseless death of dozens of people, hidden under the guise of research that became flimsier and flimsier as years passed and penicillin became widely available. Even after the experiment was finally terminated, the HEW Final Report completely ignored…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Medical Practices

    • 1718 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In early 1932, Public Health Service along with Tuskegee Institute began a study to see, essentially, how long will it take a black male with untreated syphilis to die due to complications of the disease. Approximately six hundred black males were signed up for the study about four hundred of those men had already contracted syphilis. In return for the mens cooperation they received, free medical exams, free meals and burial insurance. All men in the study were thought to have been receiving treatment, but all along it was just to see how long it will take someone to die from the disease. It was first projected to last only six months but it actually went on for forty years.…

    • 1718 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Medical and scientific research have been the cornerstones of innovation and discovery for centuries. The development of anesthesia, surgical techniques, and the basic flu vaccination were conceived through decades of experimentation and research. There are always ethical implications concerning research, especially when involving human subjects. Though in our current time there are legal regulations enforced to ensure that trials are being conducted ethically, this was not always the case; the idea of what is ethical and unethical in medical research has also transformed. The Tuskegee Syphilis study is usually noted as the most unethical and inhumane use of unconsented experimentation on Black Americans in the nation’s medical history.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There were a lot of experiments being done that challenged ethics. A scientist named Chester Southam was doing cancer research and was testing people without their knowledge. “In February 1954, Southam loaded a syringe with saline solution mixed with HeLa. He slid the needle into the forearm of a woman who’d recently been hospitalized for Leukemia, then pushed the plunger injecting about five million of Henrietta’s cells into her arm. Using a second needle, Southam tattooed a tiny speck of India ink next to the small bump that formed at the HeLa injection site.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a similar fashion, Will Rodman contradicts nature by perfecting the drug ALZ-112 which fixes Alzheimer's by attacking the genes of host cells with a retrovirus. However, the study of Alzheimer's has more potential for good than reanimating life does (because curing Alzheimer's displays more realistic potential and a higher likelihood to help a large audience of people). But, Rodman still crosses the fine line that determines science does too much when he starts to treat his specimens like inanimate objects and conducts mediocre science. Rodman turns the world into his personal game of chess where he controls what happens, when he wants it, and where he wants it. Rodman's game of chess parallels Frankenstein raping nature as he too digs into…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They conducted a study on 408 test subjects without their informed consent. They were told that they were receiving medical treatment for “bad blood”, but in truth, they never even received penicillin, which was the most effective treatment for syphilis. Doctors used the incentive of free medical exams, meals, and burial insurance in exchange for taking part of the study. This 40 year long study ended in the many deaths of African-American test subjects and is considered as one of the most unethical scientific researches in US history. President Bill Clinton even formally apologized to the study’s victims on behalf of the United States albeit only 7 of these men lived to witness it (The Tuskegee Syphilis…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animals all around the world are used for testing and research. People always wonder why people use animals. They ask why would scientist put these innocent creatures through something horrible. It has been proven that scientist use about 100 million animals for testing and research each year. From personal research, I have seen many inhumane things happen to these creatures that should not happen.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Physical and Psychological effects are equally harmful and both are unethical for experiments. The “greater good” was not benefitted from the findings of the Tuskegee experiment. In this experiment,…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For most people there are two scenarios that come to mind when they hear animal testing. The first scenario is that scientist are torturing, neglecting and abusing the animals that are being tested on. The other scenario is that scientist are being ethical, take care of the animals and are creating life-saving medicines. This makes the use of animals in experiments a controversial topic; a topic that isn’t quite black and white when argued. There are different types of animal testing like, medical testing and cosmetic testing; one is more ethical than the other.…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Medical science has only begun to become ethical. In early medical studies, scientists and doctors were able to perform, what we would call today, torturous experiments on people without permission or informed consent. Unfortunately without these hideous experiments or controversial studies, we would not have been able to cure or treat people with a deadly disease. The movie, Lorenzo’s Oil, displays the four ethical theories and highlights some of the ethical principles while lacking others. This movie shows that successful science does not always play by the rules.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Viewpoints

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages

    After studying multiple views on animal testing I have come to realize my personal view has now changed since the start of my research. Before undergoing heavy study into animal testing I believed that all types of animal testing should be stopped, but now I believe that the idea is very beneficial and should only be done when the rights of the animal are considered. In the coming years, hopefully, more regulations can be passed to ensure that all animal’s lives are protected during experimentation. Although most animals are treated with care and no pain is dealt to them when undergoing testing, it would be a lie if I stated no animals are harmed during the process. Animal testing is extremely useful in developing life-saving drugs and medicine.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Today we have made many advances in the world. A scientific evolution has firmly been set, yet in doing so we have failed to set moral and ethical boundaries along the journey. The knowledge we have acquired is remarkable, but with it comes responsibility to use it wisely and ethically. Every day we torture and kill thousands of animals for our own heartless wants. Animal Testing has been a highly debated and ongoing topic for many years.…

    • 2182 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays