Mireille Paquet’s article “The Federalization of Immigration and Integration in Canada” published in the Canadian Journal of Political Science issue. 47, September 2014. Speaks about the institutional changes between 1990 - 2010 in the Canadian governments immigration and integration of policies between the federal and provincial government. Paquet is a professor in the social science department at Concordia University in Montreal, Canada and has written many articles regarding immigration. Her findings throughout this article reference provincial mobilization, the decentralization of federal government and province - building as a mechanism as potential contributors to the change in provincial participation in immigration and integration policies.
…show more content…
“Theorized system that produces outcomes through the interaction of a series of parts that transmit causal forces from X to Y” She concludes that the greatest mechanism is province building with a focus on immigration, with policies pushing provinces to see immigration as a resource and to embrace mobilization. Paquet builds her argument with provincial case studies, for instance Quebec’s 1991 Immigration Agreement, caused by Quebec’s nation building and mobilization which put pressure on the decentralization of the governments power of immigration. The agreement gave Quebec rights to a quasi-autonomous implementation of immigration policies, this unbalanced the pre-existing federal dominance and provincial avoidance by creating a situation where the government had to find a new way to interact with the provincial government. The government then extended similar offers to other provinces but few were interested, and after it was revealed that there would be no increase in funding to provinces there was no interest. Though the success from Quebec’s agreement meant that the federal government began to change its ideas on provincial involvement in immigration and integration, which led to the slow inclusion of provinces in immigration policy discussions therefore creating a type of provincial legitimacy in regards to immigration and integration
“Theorized system that produces outcomes through the interaction of a series of parts that transmit causal forces from X to Y” She concludes that the greatest mechanism is province building with a focus on immigration, with policies pushing provinces to see immigration as a resource and to embrace mobilization. Paquet builds her argument with provincial case studies, for instance Quebec’s 1991 Immigration Agreement, caused by Quebec’s nation building and mobilization which put pressure on the decentralization of the governments power of immigration. The agreement gave Quebec rights to a quasi-autonomous implementation of immigration policies, this unbalanced the pre-existing federal dominance and provincial avoidance by creating a situation where the government had to find a new way to interact with the provincial government. The government then extended similar offers to other provinces but few were interested, and after it was revealed that there would be no increase in funding to provinces there was no interest. Though the success from Quebec’s agreement meant that the federal government began to change its ideas on provincial involvement in immigration and integration, which led to the slow inclusion of provinces in immigration policy discussions therefore creating a type of provincial legitimacy in regards to immigration and integration