Federalist Paper No. 10 was published on November 29, 1787 under the title of, The Union As a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection. It follows the groundwork previously established by Federalist Paper No. 9 where …show more content…
51 was titled, The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments. In this Federalist Paper, James Madison describes the system of checks and balances within our Constitution. He states that the power of the Government and their authority is granted from the citizens in which they govern so long as they act in the name of the citizens, preserve their rights and ensuring justice (Madison A23). In addition, Madison also discusses that although we have checks and balances, each branch should remain independent of one another. However, this would lead to a flaw wherein that every office and official would be chosen by election. The framers of the constitution believed that those voting would not vote with the basis of everyone having the right skills for that job. With the government depending on the people for power, it is up to the people then to ensure that powers are not taken for granted and that we institute safeguards, such as checks and balances to protect us. Madison even dictates towards us that if we were indeed angels, then we would not require a government. Madison concludes this essay with stating that certain countries are too large for self-government to flourish, however his proposed plan of justice to be the purpose of government and society.
Throughout James Madison’s Federalist Paper No. 10 and Federalist Paper No. 51, he discusses the importance of uniting as a whole and coming together in common interests and also to define checks and balances for the three branches of government. Madison’s main issue was to how to minimize the risk of having a central institutional entity and reducing the risk of the majority against the minority. He believes that justice is what will prevail and help society flourish, otherwise anarchy would be