Ethical Theory Of Virtue Ethics

Superior Essays
Show More
Affirmative action is a procedure taken by government that constituted or the purpose of past discrimination ,removing barriers and avoid present discrimination in every aspect life. For example, education, employment, or contracting with a groups of people for services which always involves minority groups. The first reason is that most companies focus on diversity management and integration of the same gender or gain employment in Malaysia .The fact is that while you can take care of the diversity of the company , it may not hold anyone responsible whether applicants and employees are treated fairly and without taking into account gender, race , and ethnicity in hiring and promotion decisions . In the United States , job segregation and …show more content…
The company is currently celebrating the promotion of minority occasionally into senior management , but ignore making patterns or acquisition talented in the lower tier . Resegregation is happening because firms that fail to monitor progress towards equal opportunities. Despite the absence of regulatory pressure from the federal government and social actions , many companies continue to embrace the idea of equal opportunity because they value both diversity and equality . Diversity may lead to broader ideas and problem-solving strategies .
Virtue Ethics
Aristotle is given credit for creating the theory of Virtue Ethics. The ethical theory of Virtue Ethics is different from other theories. Virtue Ethics does not analyse the morality of an action unlike deontology. Virtue Ethics does not analyse the consequence or outcome of an action unlike Utilitarianism and Ethical Egoism.
Conversely, Virtue Ethics underline the character of the agent performing the action. This ethical theory trys to seek what makes a rational moral agent moral honesty as an individual. It summary that a moral honesty person will have certain character qualities, in the appropriate proportion and in harmony with all other …show more content…
It is arguable that affirmative action , in essence, discrimination based on race. The Virtue Ethicists think that a person who take part in racial discrimination would be lack in one or more of the qualities of virtue. Discrimination, in all forms, is not a worthy character quality. As a result, the Virtue Ethicist would be against affirmative action, because to take part in a discriminatory organization, such as affirmative action, would be to defend unvirtuous

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Sex Stereotyping And Affirmative Action
    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sex Stereotyping And Affirmative Action

    Affirmative action is probably one of the most misunderstood employment practices that we have discussed so far in class. When I first heard of affirmative action, others described as something beneficial only to African Americans. It appeared to be a quota system where you had to hire a certain number of black people in order to keep the government off your back. Some made it sound like the every black person benefiting from affirmative action were unskilled and undeserving. The main purpose of affirmative action was to reverse the long term effects of past policies that may have had discriminatory effect on individuals now protected by employment law.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Hrm/300 Week 2
    • 1986 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Hrm/300 Week 2

    589). Many organizations have affirmative action programs as a result of doing business with the government, and have initiated these plans willingly, or through collective bargaining agreements with labor unions (Carroll, 2012, p. 587). I feel that reverse discrimination can be difficult to prove in a court of law because of affirmative action. I also feel that because of the diversity of the many nationalities and races in the workforce today, affirmative action may not be as necessary as it was years ago. Today, when affirmative action typically refers to some degree of preferential hiring, such as when an organization not only increases the labor pool but supports minorities and women in the actual decisions as well, and when an organization specifies quantities of minorities that must be hired (Carroll, 2012,…

    • 1986 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Philosopher Pojman's Argument Analysis
    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Philosopher Pojman's Argument Analysis

    Philosopher Pojman argues against strong affirmative action, Philosopher Hettinger argues that affirmative action is justified even though the fact that such policies differentiate against young white males and Philosopher Steal shows a study of race relations in the United States. In this paper I will discuss why I side with Philosopher Pojman’s argument against strong affirmative action, you choose the path you go down and have an option to be different than others, you have opportunities and how other Philosopher’s feel on certain topics. Affirmative Action is defined by an action or policy taking favor for those who tend to or are more likely to suffer from discrimination, especially in relation to employment; positive discrimination…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Virtue And Duty-Based Ethics
    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Virtue And Duty-Based Ethics

    1) With duty-based ethics it’s about obedience of law, performing an act morally because it’s out of duty. The act is based on the fact that it’s our obligation, we do the duty out of oughtness. Virtue ethics is different from duty-based ethics as one is not acting out of oughtness or duty, but out of motivation and feelings. Acting on moral character. Virtue ethics would be to perform an act for example out of love for a mother who is ill; you take care of her because of the love you have for her not because it your duty.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Argument Against Affirmative Action
    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Argument Against Affirmative Action

    Affirmative Action Affirmative Action first began in 1961 on March 6 from The Executive Order 10925 signed by President John F. Kennedy. In 1964, the Civil Rights Act made discrimination illegal for employment regarding to race, cultural background, color, or religion. Over the course of time, this began to become beneficial to a lot of people especially if they wanted a job because of discrimination and enforced diversity and giving minorities opportunities or chances. Even though this is such a positive that’s helping people who has a disadvantage, they are some cons. The other side of the argument believe that affirmative action put race as the dominant factor in hiring or admissions to colleges/universities.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Diversity And Effectiveness
    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Diversity And Effectiveness

    A school of thought postulates that diversity impacts positively on organizations by increasing their effectiveness and thus increasing their competitive advantage. Others are of the view that diversity is a public relation stunt and has no impact on organizations or at worst impacts negatively on organizations. The purpose of this article is to find out whether diversity results in increased organizational effectiveness and consequently results in competitive advantage. ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF DIVERSITY An organization’s strategy for growth, such as expansion into new markets and mergers and acquisitions could be enhanced by diversity and inclusion.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Difference Between Affirmative Action And Slavery
    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Difference Between Affirmative Action And Slavery

    Affirmative action was signed by President John F. Kennedy it was first put into play on March 6, 1961 it called to ensure that applicants are employed, and employees are treated during employment, without concern to their race, creed, color, or national origin. Forward to 2016 where it has become a problem within college applications where colleges are now more focused on having a diverse student body rather than the quality of the student themselves. While some colleges believe that affirmative action is helping minorities it can seem condescending applying that minorities cannot achieve their objectives with their abilities or hard work. This implied meaning is similar to the belief that slaveholders argued that slavery was a ‘positive good’ that civilized blacks and raised them in every dimension of life. The arguments for affirmative action and slavery similar in the both argue that it helps to bring out potential in…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Affirmative Action: The Servicemen's Readjustment Act
    • 2402 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Affirmative Action: The Servicemen's Readjustment Act

    Affirmative Action When discussing affirmative action we must first define what the term means. Merriam-Webster’s online dictionary defines affirmative action as “the practice of improving the educational and job opportunities of members of groups that have not been treated fairly in the past because of their race, sex, etc.” (Merriam-webster). As the definition states, these policies apply to both educational and employment situations and are designed to level the playing field, and make up for past unfairness, but are not supposed to create preferential treatment of one group over another. “Affirmative action goes beyond not discriminating among employees… employers take proactive steps to help reverse the impact of discrimination against…

    • 2402 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Affirmative Action In College Admissionss
    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Affirmative Action In College Admissionss

    Affirmative action, by definition, is an action or policy favoring those who tend to suffer from discrimination, especially in relation to employment or education. Using varying instruments and policies, Affirmative Action aims to help underrepresented groups have a better job opportunities or college admissions. Generations of people have been disadvantaged by institutionalized discrimination and one way to remedy this is to place a policy that evens out the playing field. There has been numerous legal cases against affirmative action concerning college admissions, and a few have made it as far as the Supreme Court including Bakke v. Regents, Univ. of California (1978), Grutter v. Bollinger (2003), Parents Involved v. Seattle School District (2007), and most recently Fisher v. University of Texas (2013 & 2016).…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Affirmative Action
    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Affirmative Action

    Nonetheless, Affirmative Action is a policy that allows minorities to have opportunities, whether it be in a workplace…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Three Diversity Principles
    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Three Diversity Principles

    As a response to the CEO, I would point out the three diversity principles: affirmative action (AA), equal employment opportunity (EEO) and diversity initiative. To ease my CEO understanding of these three principles, I would demonstrate how these principles are different but all work and interact together. Affirmative action or AA aims to correct the past discrimination. As such, it breaks down visible and invisible obstacles so that every worker has the benefit of an equal break. Nonetheless, AA does not assure equal outcome since people with disability and minorities still facing discrimination in the workforce…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Compare And Contrast Virtue Ethics And Virtue Ethicism
    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited

    Compare And Contrast Virtue Ethics And Virtue Ethicism

    Virtue ethics actually dates back to the days of Aristotle (Rachels, p 158).” Aristotle definition of a virtue was, “a trait of character manifested in habitual action (Rachels, p 160).” Some examples of human virtues include honesty, self-control, compassion, generosity, patience and loyalty. Virtue ethics is more about the decisions a person makes based on their character, as opposed to just making decisions based on laws and customs. It falls under the category of normative ethics, which is opposed to deontology, including Kantianism.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Virtue Ethics
    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Virtue Ethics

    This is said to eliminate the need to utilize laws and other such policies which would normally dissuade negative behavior. Accordingly, most virtue theorists believe that a virtuous person would act virtuously as a result of rational thought as opposed to instinctually. There are several pros and cons regarding the theory of virtue ethics. For example, one should contemplate the fact that there is no mutual understanding or concept of what the virtues are or even should be. While a positive side of virtue ethics might be the focus on the individual and what it means to be a good human being.…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments Against Virtue Ethics
    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Arguments Against Virtue Ethics

    Back in ancient Greece Aristotle theory of Virtue Ethics begged the question “what sort of person should I be?” (SL, 254) It’s no surprise this question still persists over two thousand years after his death. To this day Aristotelian virtue ethics remains prominent in ethical theories, all this time there have been objections to its theories but there must be something to these ancient ideas. Over the course of this paper I will explain virtue ethics as a whole and present an argument against virtue ethics and why virtue ethics has been able to withstand the opposing ideas.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Aristotle's Virtue Ethics
    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Aristotle's Virtue Ethics

    Virtue ethics, a theory created by Aristotle used to make moral decisions. His theory solely relied on individualism, not society, culture or religion. His theory was introduced in ancient Greek times. For Aristotle one should be able to do good without mere pleasure or political since it would be superficial. Virtue ethics is more concerned with how one should live.…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  Cookie Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings