Civil Disobedience Definition

Improved Essays
The definition of Civil Disobedience by John Rawls, widely accepted by many, is defined as a public, non-violent, and conscientious breach of law undertaking with the aim of bringing about a change in laws or government policies.

Ronald Dworkin has divided civil disobedience into three types: integrity-based, justice-based, and policy-based. Integrity-based civil disobedience disobeys a law he/she feels immoral. Justice-based civil disobedience disobeys laws in order get back some rights denied to him/her. Lastly, policy-based civil disobedience breaks a law to change policies of which he/she believes to be dangerously wrong.

Regarding the question “ If Civil Disobedience could be morally justified”, philosophers have different point of
…show more content…
I personally agree with Dworkin’s believe that whenever the law wrongly treats a person, they have the right to civil disobedience. It’s doesn’t always have to be about justice solely, but also about other core values such as security, transparency, privacy and so on that motivates people to civil disobedience. However, I also agree with Rawls that no harm should be brought to a just and efficient society. When there is a just and efficient social institution, assuming majorities are treated equally and social development is efficient, the majority should be satisfied with the legal system. And if a government could perform their role in protecting people’s right, no harm should occur to such a society. Civil disobedience is a political act that should be exercised with a good aim to fight for public goods. It’s also crucial to be peaceful and non-violent. Civil disobedience exposes society to harm. It may encourage disrespect towards legal system, it could paralyze financial development and interfere with people’s daily living. A non-violent civil disobedience is a fundamental value to a morally justifiable civil disobedience that aims at bringing minimal harm to society. It encourages people to respect the law in …show more content…
It’s of utmost important to have a clear goal in a civil disobedient campaign. With a majority participating, it could be easy to loose yourself in a long-term protest. Different people have different opinion. Some may raise a new direction in the middle of the campaign that may interfere with the original aim. People should have a common agreement on what to fight for and cooperate peacefully to achieve the aim. Substantial violation is also important. This proves the determination of the people and the blatancy of the issue. With such a serious movement, a high degree of seriousness is needed to justify the action.

Last but not least, people should be willing to accept legal consequences. Participants should respect the law by bearing any possible consequences caused by civil disobedience. The core value of civil disobedience is a political act that is out of pubic goods. Violation of law at the first place is out of desperation and positive aim but not malevolent. Willing to submit to punishment is important in showing respect to the legal system. It also minimizes any encouragement of malicious

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Civil disobedience is defined as members of a community choosing to actively disobey laws in protest of a cause. As proponents of civil disobedience, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Gandhi advocated for those following their causes to complete acts disregarding unjust laws put in place to draw attention to their separate causes. This method of fighting for a cause emphasizes understanding of the necessity for change, that people are actively defying the law to draw attention to the unfair systems in place. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. used this to promote his movement of racial equality as compared with Gandhi’s movement for the separation of India from Britain. Both of their similar philosophies resulted in a degree of success, “the peaceful…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience is a term that varies among different people. In the mind of Henry David Thoreau the definition of Civil Disobedience requires you to have at least three things. You must be able to identify an issue at hand. You must be willing to take action for that issue. You must be prepared to take responsibility for those actions.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stephon Clark

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The report I chose was retrieved from ABC News and written by reporter Dennis Romero, addressing the heartbreaking shooting of an unarmed African American male name Stephon Clark who lived in Sacramento, California. This tragedy initiated a large protest by the Black Lives Matter movement in the Sacramento area. It affected the local community and an event in the community all day on a Thursday, March 22, 2018. The local community the protestors affected were five expressed highways. Protestors of the community held signs, wanting justice for Stephon Clark.…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Today, not many would argue that reasons for civil disobedience exist. Times have evolved and laws reformed and revoked. However, room for reform is still present, perhaps somewhere people would not expect; in the…

    • 2371 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Civil Disobedience Speech Notes Civil disobedience in a democracy is not morally justified. I have one definition to give. Civil Disobedience- an act against a certain law with no violence One thing that comes with civil disobedience is change. But, if one person can create change that gives them more power than others. Civil disobedience fails to respect other people's rights in a democracy, because of that I negate the resolution.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As stated in “What Civil Disobedience Is”, “Civil disobedience is an act of protest, deliberately unlawful, conscientiously and publicly performed” (Cohen 39). In most cases, civil disobedience is caused by an individual transgressing an unjust law in favor of a higher, unwritten law. Usually, civil disobedience occurs in a non-violent fashion as well. For instance, King proclaims that protest will be done “peacefully, openly, cheerfully, because our aim is to persuade” (qtd. in Cohen 40).…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience Dbq

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Both Dr. Martin Luther King’s letter from Birmingham city jail as well as Henry David Thoreau’s civil disobedience shows how we should all practice civil disobedience for justice and to right an unjust law or action. Which bring up the question of whether civil disobedience is effective or ineffective in achieving change? Based on history we see civil disobedience is an effective way to achieve change in democratic countries. Civil disobedience can only work in a democratic country because in a democracy the government gains all its power from the people. In the case of dr. martin Luther king, he executed a nonviolent movement with thousands of fellow citizens to achieve change.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Susan B. Anthony once asked, "Are you going to cater to the whims and prejudices of people who have no intelligent knowledge of what they condemn?" While the answer is seemingly obvious, few individuals have dared to oppose established laws and stand up for their unorthodox beliefs. Raised in an era in which women lacked many basic rights and were considered inferior to men, Susan B. Anthony challenged America’s deeply ingrained social norms of male dominance and advocated for major reform. On November 5, 1872, she casted her ballot in the national election.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In today’s modern society, peacefully resisting to unjust laws is almost an everyday thing. All around the globe today, we see prime examples of nation’s citizens peacefully demonstrating their opinions and believes to their ruling governments. That being said, civil disobedience and peacefully resisting to laws positively impact a free society. By peacefully resisting, societies come together to achieve a common goal, which is to fight back against their ruling governments due to unjust and unfair laws that negatively impact the governed.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that civil disobedience to laws negatively impacts the free society, whether there is harm or no harm done it still negatively impacts the free society. Thomas Jefferson believed "If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so." He states this not in a speech but paraphrases it in the declaration of independence it is okay to disobey the law. He says “whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government...,". Jefferson is completely with the fact that civil disobedience positively impacts the free society.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the modern age of America, there are many people who have read about and abided by the idea of civil disobedience. Civil disobedience is a philosophy discussed by Henry Thoreau that states if a law is unjust, one must stop obeying the government to force change, which was also an ideology utilized by Martin Luther King Jr. People in America continue to use the idea of civil disobedience today which shows that the concept has survived the test of time. In American society today, civil disobedience is used and justified.…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, although a person has a responsibility to follow state laws in exchange for experiencing the advantages of residing in that state, such a convention does not include unfair laws as they are proscribed. Lastly, civil disobedience may counteract the greater iniquity of repression thus it is a public benefit in such instances (Olsen 220). There is nothing to lose with civil disobedience because if the majority opinion is not changed by civil disobedience, justice and stability remains sustained. However, civil disobedience strengthens the possibility of improvement. If no one defies a law, then there will be no means to determine if the law is perhaps…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience Unjust

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Civil Disobedience is the right of a person to oppose a law that one believes is unjust. This is a right of an individual because their actions are a result of their feeling as though a law or regulation isn't just or fair. By peacefully opposing such a law, this person may positively influence a free society, as a demonstration of one's personal beliefs and standing up for their rights. As Rosa Parks stated, "You must never be fearful about what you are doing when it is right", people are encouraged to stand against laws that go against their personal beliefs of justice and equality. The U.S. Constitution supports a freedom of speech, enabling an individual to believe in and state whatever they wish.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil disobedience reminds everyone that it is individuals’ first moral obligation to do what they accept as true and not to conform to laws dictated to them by the majority. Individual’s moral obligation to stand for what is a right surmise that people should refuse…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience have a much more powerful movement then does violence. It was used during the civil rights movement by Martin Luther King, during the Vietnam war, and lastly Gandhi for freedom from the British. In On the Duty of Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau “the soldier is applauded who refuses to serve in an unjust war by those who do not refuse to sustain the unjust government which makes the war.” Thoreau was talking about the Mexican American War but in context of protesting for racial profiling the one that protest for the right of the good and stop kill and practice racial profiling. Civil disobedience is form of protest that has been successfully used across history for the greater good and man of the times it works.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays