The Crucible Trial Analysis

For each of the trials, the most effective pieces of evidence came from the defense groups. In trial 1, my defense team used evidence of Danforth’s loyalty to God to support his innocence. We stated that if Danforth is accused of being judicially bias, it was against what he believed religiously (breaking the Commandments). In trial two, the defense team was also the most effective with their evidence because when Abigail was accused of perjury, they argued that was not valid since perjury is lying under oath to which was never mentioned in The Crucible.
2. If had a different role in trial 1, I would have asked deeper questions to the prosecution witnesses addressing why Parris signed the death warrants. I think this would have