The Hobby Lobby Supreme Court case was definitely one case that significantly impacted business and society. The owners of the Hobby Lobby corporation went to trial in order to prevent from providing free contraceptive to their employees because it was against their beliefs. In fact, they won the trial and were given the right to religious freedom. Hobby Lobby, and other corporations should not have the right to religious freedom. Corporations should not have the right to religious freedom because employers should not push their beliefs and make decisions for their employees, nor be exempt from following certain government regulations that would benefit their employees.…
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby was a case between Sylvia Burwell, the secretary of Health and Human Services, and Hobby Lobby’s owners and founders. This case dealt with the issue of should Hobby Lobby be able to deny employees contraceptives on the health care provided for the workers by the business. This case was a case between workers’ healthcare and religious rights. This case gains attention and the Supreme Courts elect to hear it. They come to the decision that Hobby Lobby should be left their religious freedoms.…
Burwell v, Hobby Lobby is a court case that resulted from an issue which addresses the necessity of closely held corporations supplying birth control to its employees. The argument of this case is regarding the mandatory requirement to supply coverage for birth control. Hobby Lobby feels the mandate will also cover birth control options that also includes the abortion pill. Hobby Lobby opposed to this idea and due to their religious beliefs. they believe that they should not be required to supply such coverage for birth control under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the Free Exercise Clause.…
The late 19th century is famous for large trusts dominating market power, such as John D Rockefeller’s oil and JPMorgan’s railroads. Even before Teddy Roosevelt could enforce his trust-busting leadership, the courts were determined to limit the power of huge corporations. These events took place just as professional baseball was at its inception. The Sherman Antitrust Act theoretically should have limited MLB as a monopoly. However, through court decisions, MLB was given immunity from antitrust laws, and would maintain this immunity until today.…
IRAC of #2B II. Count Two of the criminal complaint, possession of equipment to manufacture methamphetamine, should be dismissed on the ground that it is a lesser-included offense of Count Three, manufacture of methamphetamine ("meth"). The issue in the present case is whether §43: Possession of Equipment or Supplies with Intent to Manufacture Meth (“Possession of Equipment”) should be dismissed because it is a lesser-included offense of Count Three, §51: Manufacture of Meth. A defendant cannot be charged with the same crime twice, for that would be considered double jeopardy.…
Facts: Louisiana legislature gave a monopoly of livestock landing and the slaughterhouse business due to a surplus of cattle in Texas. The law required that the Crescent City Live-Stock Landing and Slaughter-House Company allow any person to slaughter animals in the slaughterhouse for a fixed fee. Butchers sought out a suit to challenge the monopoly, stating that the state law violated their right to practice their trade. Procedural History: Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment declares: “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of the citizens of the United States [p. 524]”. Issues: Does the privileges and immunities clause found in the Bill of Rights Fourteenth Amendment…
Final Outline Brandy Noell BUS 311: Business Law I Instructor Brian Lahargoue September 19, 2016 I. Introduction 1. Acme Fireworks sells kinds of fireworks that include but are not limited to single-use and aerial display ground show. If an individual can think of it, Acme Fireworks can supply it. Acme Fireworks is a sole proprietorship that started out in a smal garageand is now looking to change its entity status. They are looking change because of the recent influx of larger business contract requests that will create a larger employee base, causing more liability risk, and higher demand for what some may deam either dangerous or even a hazzardous product which in turn will prompt evaluation of insurance coverage and…
One primary factor that supports the government's position that the First Amendment should not be implicated to contest an action under the False Claims Act (FCA) is “truthful off-label promotional speech.” The FDA may not bring an enforcement action against the manufacturer based on truthful promotional speech alone. The FCA does not prohibit off-label promotion of prescription drugs; rather, it is a remedy for actions that cause the submission of a false claim for payment to the Government. As the FCA does not penalize speech, so the First Amendment is not implicated. Also, off-label promotion that is false or misleading is not entitled to First Amendment protection.…
At the cross section of behavioral economics and ethics lies the blueprint of ethical consumption. As a core tenet of ethical consumption, fair trade ‒ a movement and label for products supplied by producers with fair and safe compensation for their work ‒ behaves as a combatant against human rights violations, particularly human trafficking, and promotes transparency and development for “marginalized” workers. With a 15% global increase in fair trade sales from 2012 to 2013, according to Fairtrade International, a major fair trade certifier since 1997, fair trade has grown in recognition in both consumer and academic circles, spurring extensive investigation into the internal and external components of ethical consumption. The factors influencing…
The 2008 financial crisis, which left millions of Americans unemployed and ultimately resulted in trillions of dollars in lost wealth, forced congress to pass the Dodd – Frank Wall Street reform and Consumer Protection Act in 2010. The Dodd-Frank Act implemented government regulations on the financial industry. The act also protected whistle-blowers from retaliation by employers up to and including termination and discrimination. (U.S. Securities and Exchange…
The new year is an excellent time to take a look at policies and procedures within your company. One of the things to take into consideration is how you manage your logistics. Tightening government regulations, equipment costs and changes in demand all weigh heavily upon your time, and budget. When you partner with an experienced OTR trucking company for your long-haul cargo needs, you enter into a relationship that benefits your company and customers in three distinct ways. Regulatory Compliance…
It is irrefutable that, to a considerable extent, legal and non-legal actions are effective in administering justice for consumers. Consumer law has continually evolved in order to maintain its ability to protect consumers within the ever-changing modern marketplace - progressing from the common law notion of caveat emptor to an intensive legal framework recognising the fundamental need for consumer protections. While much of this contemporary framework - comprised of statutory bodies, law courts and tribunals, and working in conjunction with a myriad of other non-legal avenues - is highly effective in its delivery of justice, there remain areas of concern currently inadequate in safeguarding rights. Thus, although legal and non-legal measures…
Complying With Statutory Regulations And Organisational Safety Requirements Describe the roles and responsibilities of themselves and others under the Health and Safety at Work Act and other current legislation(such as The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations, Workplace Health and Safety and Welfare Regulations, Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations, Manual Handling Operations Regulations, Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations, Display Screen at Work Regulations, Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations) The responsibilities I have as an employee means I have a duty to take care of my own health and safety and that of others who may be affected by my actions at work. I must…
Ethical Dilemma II – Anti-trust Laws and Marketing At the epicenter of the antitrust laws throughout the world sits the belief that the economy and the public will profit most from an economic system that operates in a free market subject to strong competition and free from irrational limitations. Every company should heartily support the antitrust laws and the principles behind them. Cooperation with these laws needs to be the policy of every company and the responsibility of each employee. For example, if a company was to brand any of its products as being “Made in USA”, the company must guarantee these claims are completely and not just partially accurate.…
There have been many changes in government when it comes to antitrust enforcement. Antitrust enforcement has been regulated in order for companies to operate correctly. Private parties have been forced to create suits to bring in mergers. Mergers help businesses increase earnings in many cases. There are certain rules that are established because of these changes.…