What are the …show more content…
Issues concerning eastward expansion, Afghanistan, and the Soviet Union have been occurring since the 1940s and are contentious today. The present day events began with the September 11 terrorist attacks. The next day NATO avowed that the attack did not only defend the United States, but on the members of the nation as well; this statement portrayed unity. From 2005 to 2007, dilemmas were being handled throughout Afghanistan. Starting in 2005, forces were enlarged in Afghanistan, this originally began after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The expansion was to include members of the other countries such as Poland and the Czech Republic. As the alliance continued to progress, President Clinton stated, “We’re walking a tightrope,” as we enclosed on Russia’s border. The expansion was making other countries uneasy and reassurance was needed. Around 2007 more Europeans were transitioning their soldiers to participate with more self-defense. Two years after NATO held their 60th anniversary in …show more content…
In 2004, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization provided Greece with well protection. “We are witnessing the return of piracy as a serious security challenge… Iran’s nuclear program highlights the pressing challenge of the proliferation of weapons and mass destruction (NATO at 60: the way forward). NATO provided things such as airborne security for example air surveillance. Approximately two years later, they supplied this form of protection once more in Germany. However, for the organization to be completely successful and receive credibility for addressing the subject of international terrorism it has so succeed in Afghanistan. “The mission is vital for NATO,” says Bastian Giegeric…”If the alliance fails in Afghanistan, its appetite to engage in that kind of operation will become very limited.” In order to have success there, NATO needs to pair its ambition with the preparedness of deployment (NATO at 60: the way