In other words, broad anthropocentrism explains the ideology of taking responsibility for nature only because it will be beneficial to future generations. Light and Rolston’s opinion on the extent to which one is responsible for nature differ, but they agree “that environmental ethics prospers only with critical exchange, with deep probing, with argument…” (2). This, in fact, is why there are several ways to express the extent to which one should take responsibility for nature. Human carbon dioxide emission in Amherst, Massachusetts has negatively impacted the air quality. In order for these citizens to secure the well-being of future generations, they feel obligated to economically invest in air quality protection. However treating this non-human nature in the way we expect to be treated is just as important because nature has value in and of
In other words, broad anthropocentrism explains the ideology of taking responsibility for nature only because it will be beneficial to future generations. Light and Rolston’s opinion on the extent to which one is responsible for nature differ, but they agree “that environmental ethics prospers only with critical exchange, with deep probing, with argument…” (2). This, in fact, is why there are several ways to express the extent to which one should take responsibility for nature. Human carbon dioxide emission in Amherst, Massachusetts has negatively impacted the air quality. In order for these citizens to secure the well-being of future generations, they feel obligated to economically invest in air quality protection. However treating this non-human nature in the way we expect to be treated is just as important because nature has value in and of