The Art Of Persuasion: Henry David Thoreau And Martin Luther King Jr.

Improved Essays
The Art of Persuasion
An activist is a person who seeks for social or economic change; similarly, an extremist is someone who holds intense beliefs and acts upon them. An extreme activist is when someone has fanatical beliefs about social issues and seeks to change them in utmost ways. Two examples of extreme activists are Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. Henry David Thoreau was an American author that was motivated by his disgust with slavery to write the persuasive commentary “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience”, which was written to instruct his audience to be that counter-friction to the “machine” of government. Martin Luther King Jr. was an African American preacher during the Civil Rights era who was thrown into jail for simply standing up for what he believed in; while in jail, a group of white clergymen wrote
…show more content…
Thoreau asked, “This American government, -- what is it but a tradition, though a recent one, endeavoring to transmit itself unimpaired to posterity, but each instant losing some of its integrity?” (940; par. 2). By asking this question, even though he did not intend an answer, he pushed his audience to question the government and its unjust policies. Thoreau also asked the questions, “Must the citizen ever for a moment, or in the least degree, resign his conscience to the legislator? Why has every man a conscience, then?” (941; par. 1). Nobody likes to feel irrelevant, so when Thoreau asked these questions he intended to make the audience angry with the government in thinking so. The rhetorical questions that Thoreau utilized in his writing were clearly effective in persuading his

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Two writers who had great impacts on their audiences were Henry Thoreau, an author and poet (as well as many other jobs he tried out), and Martin Luther King Jr., the famous civil rights activist. Although these men lived in entirely different time periods they had writings that had a similar message. Thoreau wrote an essay “Civil Disobedience” in which he discusses the flaws of government, inspired by his disgust with slavery and the Mexican-American War. King wrote “Letter from Birmingham Jail” as a response to white religious leaders who opposed King’s efforts for civil rights. Although these pieces both are both trying to convince the audience to go against something they stand for, they use very different methods to achieve their desired…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Both Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. define the profound difference between just and unjust in their writings, “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” and “Letter from a Birmingham Jail.” While the two men have a different sound throughout each of their own pieces, there is much that they agree upon about civil disobedience once clearly thought out and read. With that being said, this paper will, respectively, discuss the general content of both writings, as well as the prominent similarities and differences noticeable in the two pieces. An example of political/cultural problems the United States is facing today that emulate civil disobedience will also be presented that link to both pieces. Towards the end of this paper, I intend…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., author of Letter From a Birmingham Jail, Henry David Thoreau, author of Civil Disobedience, and Arthur Miller, the author of The Crucible all discuss the necessity of protesting against a government if it acts immorally. All of the texts argue that protest in necessary to fix problems in a corrupt government. Although others may express their disliking for an unjust authority, King stresses the importance to act upon these injustices in order to fix it. King addresses the Christian churches and how their actions have changed over time: There was a time when the church was very powerful--in the time when the early Christian rejoiced at being deemed worthy to suffer for what they believed.…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thoreau’s primary method of persuasion employs the use of rhetorical strategies to make readers want to make a change by creating a sense of self-realization of the ideas in the reader. Readers realize that there is a problem that exists, and will want to fix them. Thoreau uses parallelism, rhetorical questions, and paradoxes in order to persuade people to make a change in government. In Thoreau’s essay, “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience”, Thoreau creates a definitive flow in how he presents his…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thoreau’s essay is also different from King’s because he presents more than one goal. Not only does he describe the government’s unfair laws, but he also teaches his readers how and why to revolt, and tells them to bring an end to the ongoing Mexican War. Despite these differences, both Thoreau and King share strong similar beliefs of morality and justice that are clearly seen throughout the entirety of both essays. Both authors in their respective essays tell the people why and how they should fight for justice. They explain that in order to fight for justice, we must first distinguish between the just and unjust laws.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Henry David Thoreau were both great literary figures in the United States, yet they lived in different time periods. Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience” and King’s Letter to Birmingham Jail”are quite similar, in addition obtain certain differences between the texts. Both writers demonstrate each other 's audience on ways of being civilly disobedient towards their corrupt government and how to have a relationship with them. On the other hand, certain differences, both texts possess are whom it was addressed to as well as the occasions and appeal. Both texts fractions in similarities and differences through their analysis, such as occasion, strategies used, and other figures used in their writings.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thoreau, however is not so optimistic. He believes that what ever happens in Atlanta does not affect other people or in that matter another city that has nothing to do with it. He also believes that one person's vote or participation can make a difference. Thoreau holds that majority and nothing can change that.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wood insist the essay was a narrative and dramatic essay which caused critics to think his work was out of proportion and uninteresting. Wood thinks his focus and accomplish was too dramatic and narrative form, yet his work lacked the message to his essay on being a truly self-reliant man. Wood and other critics expected to read and get the message with more supporting details on civil disobedience rather than his experience and thoughts. Thoreau offered encouragement to the individual’s rights, to withdraw any support from a government whose policies are evil. He was such a moral thinker, did not fear possible consequences of civil disobedience against injustice.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry David Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience and Plato’s Allegory of the Cave reveal differences and similarities on their outlook on government and solutions to rid their prospective states of certain problems. These solutions focus on freeing oneself from conforming to societal norms in favor of seeking “enlightenment” and awareness. The aforementioned great minds of their times both argue variations of the same views on human existence and an individual 's role in their respective societies. At their core, these two political philosophies urge humanity to threaten the safety of the status quo; they push man to dare to be skeptics, dare to climb out of the depths of their limited perspectives, dare to question what is true reality…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since Henry David Thoreau coined the phrase “Civil Disobedience” in an essay, the term has been assigned to a number of movements throughout history. The essay’s ideas have inspired several significant figures throughout history, including Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Jr., and Nelson Mandela (Source A). These three men led non-violent struggles in which unjust laws were disobeyed, and they each finally won profound and positive societal changes. But not every act of civil disobedience is successful. There were specific factors that allowed certain movements to triumph and others to be crushed.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By posing rhetorical questions to the reader, and providing answers as well, Thoreau appeals personally to the reader, pulling them further into his writing and allowing them to think for themselves. This, then, brings the issue of the corrupt government, and the manipulation of the citizens into the open, forcing the reader to think about it. When Thoreau provides an answer, as well as examples, the reader is, once…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Emerson only suggests social and political change that he believes could better society, Thoreau almost firmly demands it. In Emerson’s eyes, government and society are things that still have a chance to be reformed - to be molded around the importance of the individual rather than the whole. Thoreau, though, rejects the idea that they can be fixed. He believes that, “Government is at best but an expedient; but most governments are usually, and all governments are sometimes inexpedient” (Thoreau 964).…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Individual’s Moral Obligation to stand for what is Right In “Civil Disobedience” by Thoreau asserts that government seldom shows itself sufficient and that it often derives its power from the majority; who are its subjects. Furthermore, Thoreau underscores that the state, just as corporates have no conscience, but through its citizens, can be viewed as conscientious or reckless. Consequently, it is up to the people to practice conscience when endeavoring into their activities.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The difference of Machiavelli and Thoreau’s view on governing comes from the fact that they both are taking opposite perspectives on the same issue. Both discuss harsh governing. Machiavelli views it as necessary, while Thoreau views it as unjust, however Machiavelli is writing as one who governs, while Thoreau is writing as one being governed. The difference in audience is the cause for the differences between Machiavelli and Thoreau’s understanding of morality, humanity, and efficiency.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The imagery he provides by using metaphor makes the essay something that people can relate to, and intends to inspire readers to not only read the essay, but also take action based on what Thoreau…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays