Many theists claim that morality does not in fact reach farther than God’s commandments. Proponents of the Divine Command Theory maintain that morality is based solely on religion, and that everything God commands is good simply because God commanded it. However, if everything God says becomes automatically morally good, the meaning of the word “moral” is lost. Therefore, this theory “makes right and wrong subject to God’s whims, which makes it impossible for God to be non-trivially good” (Lecture 9/28). Without a separation between morality and God’s commandments, there would be no way to know the true nature of morality.…
4. McGrath’s Dilemma and Responses on Behalf of the Moral Bridge Inferentialist 4.1 The Dilemma At this point in the dialectic, McGrath wants to make room for her non-inferential moral perception account of moral knowledge. One way she tries to make room for her view is by giving a negative argument against moral bridge inferentialism, one of the more plausible versions of moral inferentialism, which comes in a form of a dilemma.…
The central argument of the text is that a person is acting immorally when holding unsound beliefs whether or not they are caught in their beliefs. Building further on these beliefs or using them as a basis for other beliefs would be acting immorally as well. It is not the belief that is wrong but rather how one obtains the belief. It would also be immoral to continue to hold a belief while ignoring substantial evidence against said belief. Some people get so caught up in their beliefs that they are blind to investigating their belief for good reason.…
The strengths of this theory are that some people believe that you can’t separate morality and religion, it provides a moral law and we as people have motivation to follow those laws, it preserves Gods authority. People who believe that religion and morality is inseparable are those that believe that “…religion is the source or basis or morality and that moral precepts are simply what God says should be done… the moral law is the will of God, and the will of God is the moral law” (Vaughn, 9). Without moral reasoning where would our society be? In article “10 Commandments List” by Mike Bennet, list the religious moral rules; “1. You shall have no other gods before me…6.…
In chapter 4 of James Rachels and Stuart Rachels book, The Elements of Moral Philosophy, the authors examine the philosophical question whether morality depends on religion. They noted that in popular thinking, morality and religion are inseparable and that people generally accept that morality can be understood only in the framework of religion. On the other hand, from the perspective of the atheist or non religious people, the world is full of evil and in total chaos. Furthermore, the concept behind an all loving God and the ultimate rule maker of the moral code depicts the theory of Divine Command. The Divine Command Theory postulates that the question of what is morally right is commanded by God, and morally wrong is forbidden by God and draws a conclusion that the objectivity problem in ethics seems to be solved.…
Harman presents the argument that we never have any evidence for or against any moral claim and that moral “facts” serve no purpose regarding the explanation of making observations unlike scientific facts do. In this essay, I will argue why I believe that Harman’s argument is ultimately successful, successful being that it is convincing of its conclusion. I will accomplish this by first paraphrasing Harman’s premises in an understandable manner. Next, I intend to provide a possible attack that could be used to show how Harman’s argument fails and alter my focus on to why that attack should not succeed as well as delivering a counter-argument to ensure my argument is not one-sided. Finally, I will provide a proper conclusion that summarizes…
Lucas Shaw Short paper #1 Philosophy, Topic #2 Cosmological argument for the existence of God. Cosmological argument: An argument (or set of arguments) that undertakes to “prove” that God exists on the basis of the idea that there must have been a first cause or an ultimate reason for the existence of the universe (Introducing Philosophy, pg 661). This is the definition of this argument according to this particular book.…
Conversely, if we were not believers, this interpretation would allow us to recognize the basic moral principles in our human nature. Thus, I believe that this argument allows a broad recognition of moral principles that moral in human…
CHRISTIANITY Claim Transcendence is the belief that a divine realm exists outside of the universe. It is the belief that there is one God, you have a soul, and after death you go to Heaven or Hell. Christianity is one of the religions that was formed out of this belief. Christianity claims that Jesus, God the Son, came to earth to reveal the Father to us and then save us from our sins by dying on the cross about 2,000 years ago.…
The APB argument also removes the need to ask “Are God's actions moral?”, because if…
Two theories discussed in class were, the “Correspondence Theory of Truth,” meaning “X” is true if “X” is capable of correspondence to something in the outside, external, objective, or observant world. The other theory is the “Coherence Theory of Truth,” which says “X” is true when “X” belongs to a consistent system of propositions. The theory I think is the most accurate account of truth is the “Correspondence Theory of Truth,” it is based on the reality surrounding us, something we can prove. Unlike the “Coherence Theory of Truth,” which bases if something is true or not ideally on an idea, or because a hypothesis says otherwise. This theory seems to be based on assumptions really, not concrete evidence that will help us prove truth.…
The evolutionary story suggests that our moral beliefs evolved organically to select for what would keep a community alive. That our morals do not approach an objective truth, but are merely adaptively fit. This lends to an argument that since we are not evolved to know the truth, our morals may be totally invalid, and so we cannot rationally believe them. This argument that we cannot trust our morals is flawed.…
Where the beginning of Morality came from has been a huge debate among people for hundreds of years now. Morality can also be called the goodness in people or the desire to be good. Theists believe morality comes from God. Atheists believe that morality comes from our own conscience or reason. In this essay we are going to focus on proving that morality could not have come from God in view of the following reasons, 1: You can be good without God, 2: The Bible is not a clear guide for direction on morality, 3: There are many things that religious people do not agree with, and 4: The problem of evil.…
The thought behind Moral Truths is that there are ways that we can distinguish facts and evidence from personal claims. Objectivity in morality is empirical, giving people the knowledge and data to support their actions. By acting with Moral Objective Truths rather than Subjectivity, society will be driven more by facts and not opinions which will prove better in different circumstances. In this, we find the best ways in which one should act leading to better ethics taking place. The concepts of Moral Objective Truth show the need for claims backed by experience and evidence, therefore providing better reasoning to support one's own point of view.…
Also it gives a counter argument, which it disproves and came up with the conclusion. While the premises is base on that God is real and that is we follow God commands, it still able to prove that God will is dependent of God’s Will. However, the whole argument relied on the notion “God is Good” means that “God command are God commands”, if argument did not define this then they whole argument would not had work. Also the whole concept in which moral law would be arbitrary if God willed what is right and wrong must be define to order…