Essay On The Stanford Prison Experiment

Improved Essays
A Review of the Stanford Prison Experiment

By
Andrew Scudder
PSYC 1111

In the Stanford Prison Experiment, the general idea was that prisons do not work when it comes to the rehabilitation of inmates. On the contrary, prisons only succeed in the further distancing of those incarcerated and those in charge of upholding the law. Once a prisoner has served their time, they are more likely to commit another crime. The Stanford Prison Experiment suggests that the relationship between guard and prisoner is one of the reasons for this lack of rehabilitation. This experiment consisted of twenty-one participants. All of whom were collage age males. Ten of the participants were designated as prisoners and eleven were designated as guards. The prisoners were put into a simulated prison which included individual cells, created by fabric, a small closet which was called solitary confinement, and a “prison yard”. There was also quarters for the guards and the
…show more content…
The downside of the experiment was that it was just a simulation. It could not truly reflect the harshness of prison life. The threat of physical abuse or even loss of life was not present. Nor was the very real possibility of having one’s sentence extended due to infractions of prison law. In my opinion these are two of the leading reasons why prison can break a prisoner spirit. Even though these were not factors, the experiment clearly showed how prison can affect an inmates mental focus. While there are some realities of prison that cannot be ethically duplicated, one thing that could be changed is the location. Find a more prison like setting. Instead of having sheets form the rooms, find a location where there are actually rooms with doors that lock from the outside. The idea of having four solid walls could help to cement the concept of being in

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    This piece is an outline of the Stanford Prison Experiment. To start the collection of resources, I decided to choose one that would most benefit someone unfamiliar with the Stanford Prison Experiment. It covers the general idea and procedure of the social experiment. I wanted my first source to be completely objective and to give anyone unfamiliar with the experiment an overview. This article would benefit a student writing a synthesis because it provides objective, straightforward facts.…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What happens when good people are put in an evil place? What about when innocent individuals are systematically punished and humiliated? Is human identity rooted in one 's situation? A 1971 endeavor, now known as Zimbardo 's Prison Experiment, attempted to explore these questions and others.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This experiment help prisoners receive their basic rights and shed a light on prison guards abusing…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The study will include two experimental groups and a controlled group of individuals whom will be paid to spend time in a prison simulation. The results of this experiment will be qualitative as the ability to quantify someone psychological state would not be beneficial in this experiment. Participants There will be a total of 30 male subjects between the ages of 21 years old and 35…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was a proposed two-week experiment that turned into a six day nightmare. “The original intent was to study whether the behavior of prisoners and guards was dispositional or situational” (McLeod, 2008). However, what they got out of the experiment was a “situation in which prisoners were withdrawing and behaving in pathological ways” and where some of the guards “were behaving sadistically” (Zimbardo). The Stanford Prison Experiment is one of the most controversial studies ever conducted in the “history of social psychology” (Konnikova, 2015). The results of this experiment show the truth of how absolute power corrupts absolutely, why good people do bad things, and how it can be applied to real life situations (Dalberg-Acton).…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1971, Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment which tested the behaviors of both prisoners and guards in a simulated prison created by him and his colleagues at Stanford University. In the article written by Dr. Zimbardo, Pathology of Imprisonment, he discusses the process of the experiment and his findings. To begin, Dr. Zimbardo gathered a group of 24 male student volunteers. All of the students that participated in the study received compensation of $15 per day. Each student was evaluated emotionally and mentally to determine their stability, and if they were able to participate.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This experiment went wrong and led to mental problems. These problems became so extreme that the experiment was discontinued after 6 days instead of 2 weeks. The Stanford Prison Experiment called into question the idea of Good vs Evil. The experiment showed how situational journey can cause an individual to “compromise” their beliefs. This change in behavior lead to psychological conflict among the “guards” and “prisoners.”…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Report on the Stanford Prison Experiment for PSYC 1111 The Office of Naval Research sponsored a study at Stanford University to "develop a better understanding of the basic psychological mechanisms underlying human aggression" and to identify which conditions can lead to aggression when men are living in close quarters for a long period of time (Haney, C., Banks, W.C. & Zimbardo, P.G. (1973)). This experiment took form within a model prison created in the basement at Stanford University to discover the variables found in prisons that can lead to aggression in people, i.e. guards and prisoners. The hypothesis explored was that ‘guards’ and ‘prisoners’ would react in different ways and their behavior and state of being would differ from each…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to obtain candidates for the experiment, an advertisement was placed in the newspaper for anyone who wanted to participate in the study of how life was in prison. Seventy-five men were interviewed for the roles, but of those seventy-five, only twenty-four were chosen. They were selected at random to take and perform the roles of either prison guards or inmates. The experiment was meant to last two weeks’ time, but at the end of just six days, it was apparent that it should come to a close. Phil Zimbardo, the conductor of this experiment, was a teacher of psychology at the university.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was conducted by Phillip Zimbardo, a psychologist who wanted to test the conflict that volunteers would experience when put in situations where they were not in control. This experiment took men of the same ages and put them in a “prison” setting, giving them each the label of either guard or inmate. By grouping these men together in separate categories it demonstrated a form a social control. According to James Henslin, author of the book “Sociology: A Down- To- Earth Approach,” social control can be defined as the techniques and strategies employed to prevent deviant behavior in any society.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The study consisted of a group of male college students. The group was randomly divided, some men designated as guards and others as prisoners. In the experiment, real arrests and prison conditions were simulated. “Prisoners” were confined to cells. They wore degrading prison uniforms.…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted in 1971 by researcher, Philip Zimbardo is one of the most eye-opening social studies done to this day. It’s purpose was to find out more about how the social principles of obedience and conformity can affect the behavior of a normal human being. Zimbardo wanted to discover how social customs and hierarchy affect the roles people play, in a prison setting (Lurgio, 2015, p.1866). Though their purpose seems praiseworthy, the experiment itself was not. It was filled with ethical violations and in just 6 days, spun out of control (Lurgio, 2015, p.1866).…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This would keep the prisoners in a better mood because they would be getting the proper amount of nutrition needed to be a functional member of the prison. Studies also show that certain vitamins help keep a stabilized mood which could help keep violence down in the prison. Exercise is also very important as it helps keep the body in good physical shape and it’s also shown to improve mood and help fight of depression so frequent exercise is good for keeping the prison population happy. I would also recommend for every prison to have a garden so the prisoners could grow their own food which would help keep prison food cost down but it is also a good way to relive…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Phillip Zimbardo (1972) gave us notable understandings into human behaviour, even though considered an unethical study. In the scandalous experiment, a group of participants completed a study in a mock prison environment. Some of the participants took on the role of prisoner, and others acted as the guards. The guards behaved in an inhumane and demeaning way towards the participants acting as prisoners. They were not given full details e.g. on what to expect and how to behave.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fear Of Prisons

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    If I was a guard, I believe that I would have become a guard who is oppressive, but not to the point of physically injuring the inmate. I believe that I would adopt a behavior of oppressing the inmates because I would be fearful that the inmates would feel power in numbers against me without my constant threats, but I would recognize that my role as a guard is not real, thus I would not physically abuse the inmates. However, I am unsure whether if my idealistic morals will still remain intact once I actually engage in the experiment. Like in the actual experiment, I cannot guarantee if the inmates will actually be submissive under my rule or if the inmates will plan a rebellious uprising.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays