Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, one character is good and one is evil. The same thing occurs in Frankenstein, where Victor is good, and the creature ends up being evil. Stevenson wrote, “This, as I take it, was because all human beings, as we meet them, are commingled out of good and evil: and Edward Hyde, alone in the ranks of mankind, was pure evil,” (Stevenson). This provides the evidence that Jekyll would be considered the good in the story and Hyde would be considered the evil. This relates to Frankenstein, when Shelley wrote, “I saw at the window a figure the most hideous and abhorred. A grin was on the face of the monster; he seems to jeer, as with a fiendish finger he pointed towards the corpse of my wife,” (Shelley 145). This supposes that the creature has now become evil as he smiles and points towards the dead corpse. Not only was he smiling, but he was called a monster, something only the evil would be called. In both stories there was a good and an evil in the relationship between the
Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, one character is good and one is evil. The same thing occurs in Frankenstein, where Victor is good, and the creature ends up being evil. Stevenson wrote, “This, as I take it, was because all human beings, as we meet them, are commingled out of good and evil: and Edward Hyde, alone in the ranks of mankind, was pure evil,” (Stevenson). This provides the evidence that Jekyll would be considered the good in the story and Hyde would be considered the evil. This relates to Frankenstein, when Shelley wrote, “I saw at the window a figure the most hideous and abhorred. A grin was on the face of the monster; he seems to jeer, as with a fiendish finger he pointed towards the corpse of my wife,” (Shelley 145). This supposes that the creature has now become evil as he smiles and points towards the dead corpse. Not only was he smiling, but he was called a monster, something only the evil would be called. In both stories there was a good and an evil in the relationship between the