Therefore, he is an expert in this field and has much experience dealing with cases regarding the consequences of police brutality due to the government not implementing body cameras. In addition, the author provides a reason to believe by uniquely expressing his viewpoint and boldly stating his opinion on the effect of body cameras on police officers and citizens. O’Mara states, “People act better when they know they're being watched -- or recorded. Cops act better, and the people they encounter on the street are more cooperative.” O’Mara references a studied commissioned by the Police Foundation in 2012 that displays statistical evidence proving few force incidents with body cameras.…
“In April 2015, Michael Slager, a 33-year-old white police officer in North Charleston, South Carolina, fatally shot Walter Scott, an unarmed 50-year-old African American man, after he pulled Scott's car over for having a faulty taillight. Slager claimed he had feared for his life when Scott stole his Taser, an account backed by the police department. Days later, however, a bystander, Feidin Santana, released cell phone footage of the shooting to the media that showed the two men engaging in a brief scuffle before Scott ran away. Slager then shot Scott eight times in the back before placing an object, which many speculated was his Taser, next to Scott's prone body. After the release of the video, Slager was fired from the force and charged with murder; a grand jury indicted him in June”().…
Additionally police wearing body camera will only prevent them from doing their duty. “Police do a lot of social work, and cameras can make those kind of interactions more difficult” (police body cameras.2016). For example an officer was trying to comfort a teenager that lived in an abusive home but found it difficult to do so because he was wearing a body camera. Police should not wear body cameras because they do not increase trust between civilians and police instead wearing them do the opposite reduce…
Being able to answer the questions would make it easier to write a police body camera policy because it would identify and answer who, what, how and why for the policy. Once the legislature has the answers, it may be able to adopt a policy that is agreeable to all parties involved. In conclusion, adopting a body camera policy may help deter police violence and misconduct allegations that may occur while interacting with the public. The officers being recorded by the cameras should help with the performance their duties in a professional…
Although there are several pros and cons to this subject, the pros most definitely out weigh the cons. Over the past decade due to social media and increasing racial and societal tensions, more and more pressure has been placed on police officers to wear body cameras to document their daily interactions. While this is certainly a complex issue it seems to make the most sense that officers should wear body cameras. Studies show that with body cameras in place there…
To prevent cases like these people have brought up the idea of police officers wearing body cameras while on duty to record every incident they encounter while on duty. These body cameras can help by preventing violence, and help with accountability, but also bring up the issue about privacy. First, the use of body cameras can help prevent violence between the police officer and the victim. When a victim gets stopped by the police officers they are…
2) They will be a great tool for completing reports and there will be less room for lying on both parts or exaggerating events that went down. If both parties are aware that their actions can be seem through the cameras, this can curb misbehaving. When people know that they are under surveillance, they tend to cooperate more than they would without it. With body cameras, police departments have the ability to complete more thorough review of cases, investigations, and can compare police misconduct…
The article Police Body Cameras analyzes the possible outcomes of this idea. The article states that using body cameras could offer protection to both parties, equating to a win-win scenario. Not only would the footage “protect the public against police misconduct”, but it would also “protect the police against false accusations of abuse” (p. 8). The footage collected from the cameras would offer accurate account of incidents which have in the past been blurred with bias against police as well as the blue shield of trust which protects fellow officers from their wrongdoing with cover up stories. The same article further explains that body cameras could be the bridge of trust needed between the public and law enforcement through the feeling of security they provide.…
With that being said, concrete and strong restrictions need to be constructed to ensure the cameras cannot be manipulated. “Policies should require that an officer activate his or her camera when responding to a call for service or at the initiation of any other law enforcement or investigative encounter between a police officer and a member of the public” (Stanley). A cop should be reprimanded when he/she fails to wear a body camera to record. According to the article, “During the first year after the cams were introduced, the use of force by police officers reportedly declined 60% and complaints from citizens against law enforcement decreased by 88%” (Einvestigator).…
Police Body Cameras The End To Privacy Police body cameras are simply the answer to civilians unheard cries. Police body cameras will never be the answer to stopping police brutality. They are, however, the answer to angry civilians who want an end to police ferociousness. Because body cameras can only catch the officer 's point of view, the cameras are coming with a big price tag, and officers are going to have to think more before they act, police body cameras are not the answer to stopping police brutality.…
Throughout the past 10 years there has been many talks on whether the police should be required to wear body cameras. Throughout all the research and studies regarding these cameras, these have been many pros to body cams but there have also been cons and many challenges to implementing this system in police forces throughout the country. Many different police stations have done experiments with these cameras and have all shown very positive feedback. Regardless of the amount of work necessary to implement these cameras, it should be necessary for officers to wear these body cameras because they have the potential to save lives. To go along with that, police should be forced to wear these body cameras because they have the potential to save lives, give better representation than hearing a testimony, and make suspects less likely to run or attack an officer because everything they do is caught on camera.…
This raised a red flag in the eye of the public and they started asking questions and demanding answers. To solve this issue, police officers should be required to wear body cameras on duty when interacting with the public because it will show the behaviors of the police officers, collect any evidence that is needed to solve a case and it will protect the public against police brutality. Body worn cameras should be considered while on duty when interacting with the public because it will show the behaviors of both parties. Tony Farrar study is a perfect example. He is the chief of the police department…
With all the police brutality claims now there is so much controversy over police officers wearing body cameras. Some people feel that the officers should wear the cameras so that there will be a video of everything happening and there will be proof of what is going on between the officers and the civilians. Other people do not want the cameras because it violates people’s privacy. This has been an ongoing debate for a while now. In this essay I want to show some of the benefits for the body cameras.…
With police brutality increasing finding a solution is vital. Therefore police departments are trying to find solutions and body cameras is one of them. Even though privacy will be ruined, body cameras worn on police officers are one of the solutions to police brutality. Body cameras which are worn by police officers capture all activity around them within a radius of course. Therefore privacy is an issue that people might see as a problem with body…
Records show that the public’s trust in the police is at an all time low; therefore departments using body cameras have a greater advantage of increasing trust and improving relationships with the general public. Police body cameras benefit all parties, they provide documented objective video evidence that can be used to prosecute or exonerate a suspect (Gass). All in all, the launch of police body cameras protects civilians, and provides a record of the interactions between police officers and…