Many definitions of the word tribe among all definitions that conflict, though, there are some common features that stand out. Tribes are large groups through kinship. People related by blood to a common ancestor. Many societies, tribes define themselves through terms of relationships between sons, fathers, grandfathers, and other male relatives (also called “matrilineal kinship”). Some groups like to invent fictional relationships in order to make non-family relationships into family ones. Tribal societies are not governed, and do not like governments. Anthropologists call these people tribes only to modernize the sense by saying that these groups of people are not “governed”. Often informal systems like this deal with the basic realities of life (managing resources, conflicts, etc.) but they do not have institutions like states do. This statement brings controversy because tribal society is supposed to be “primitive” or “undeveloped” form of social organization that came before states in the prehistory of humanity. Consensus among social scientist is that, today tribes are always specific organizational responses to specific historical facts. The fact is that calling Afghanistan groups tribal makes no sense. A large number of Afghans are not tribal at all. Talking about “tribe” in relation to these groups is like talking about “tribes” in France, for example. These non-tribal groups mainly live in the central, western, and northern areas of Afghanistan. Relating Iraq Tribes to Afghanistan Tribes by the United States made it more difficult because the Afghan tribes do not have a tribal chief. In fact, the way people in rural Afghanistan organize themselves so different from rural Iraqi culture that calling them both “tribes” is deceptive. “Tribes” in Afghanistan do not unite with other groups, as the tribes do in Iraq. Negotiating with Afghan tribes is difficult since they are always changing
Many definitions of the word tribe among all definitions that conflict, though, there are some common features that stand out. Tribes are large groups through kinship. People related by blood to a common ancestor. Many societies, tribes define themselves through terms of relationships between sons, fathers, grandfathers, and other male relatives (also called “matrilineal kinship”). Some groups like to invent fictional relationships in order to make non-family relationships into family ones. Tribal societies are not governed, and do not like governments. Anthropologists call these people tribes only to modernize the sense by saying that these groups of people are not “governed”. Often informal systems like this deal with the basic realities of life (managing resources, conflicts, etc.) but they do not have institutions like states do. This statement brings controversy because tribal society is supposed to be “primitive” or “undeveloped” form of social organization that came before states in the prehistory of humanity. Consensus among social scientist is that, today tribes are always specific organizational responses to specific historical facts. The fact is that calling Afghanistan groups tribal makes no sense. A large number of Afghans are not tribal at all. Talking about “tribe” in relation to these groups is like talking about “tribes” in France, for example. These non-tribal groups mainly live in the central, western, and northern areas of Afghanistan. Relating Iraq Tribes to Afghanistan Tribes by the United States made it more difficult because the Afghan tribes do not have a tribal chief. In fact, the way people in rural Afghanistan organize themselves so different from rural Iraqi culture that calling them both “tribes” is deceptive. “Tribes” in Afghanistan do not unite with other groups, as the tribes do in Iraq. Negotiating with Afghan tribes is difficult since they are always changing