Roper Vs Simmons Essay

Improved Essays
There is no doubt that the two separate cases of Roper v. Simmons and Thompson v. Oklahoma the act of murder was committed by minors who were tried, convicted, and deserving of a fitting punishment. However, in this analogy between the primary and secondary analogue, the argument of Roper v. Simmons is if a minor under the age of 18 should be sentenced to Capital Punishment, and if doing so is a direct violation of the Eighth Amendment citing cruel and unusual punishment (Roper v. Simmons, 2005). The Supreme Court ruled in the case of Thompson v. Oklahoma, “that executing persons for crimes committed at age 15 or younger constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment” (Roper v. Simmons, 2005). In part, because Oklahoma’s death penalty statute set no minimum age limit in which he or she would be sentenced to death (Flaherty, 2002). The intent behind the death penalty is to one deter acts where he or she would be sentenced to death and two to punish the convicted criminal. Ultimately, the lower Missouri Supreme Court sided with Roper and ruled that …show more content…
Simmons and Thompson v. Oklahoma is where two minors are sentenced to the death penalty. A case is argued that capital punishment of a minor is a form of cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment (Roper v. Simmons, 2005).
Number of Similarities
The Simmons and Thompson were minors that committed heinous murderous acts. Both were tried and convicted as adults in a court of law and as a result, both were sentenced to the death penalty. Both cases address the issue of culpability of a minor and the extenuating circumstance of their lives that brought them to a place in their life where they would commit such crimes such “victims of abuse or other noxious influences” (Flaherty, 2002). In addition, both cases set a precedence that other courts will follow in similar court cases.
Nature and Degree of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Until 2002, Simmons made appeals to state and federal court. In 2002, Simmons execution was delayed as the Supreme Court of Missouri decided Atkins v. Virginia. In Atkins v. Virginia, the Supreme Court of Missouri held that eighth and the amendments prohibit the execution of minors. Simmons filed a new petition for state postconviction relief considering the Atkins v. Virginia case. The Missouri Supreme Court based on this decision resentenced Simmons death sentence to life in prison without chance of parole.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cole Cannon Case Summary

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The U.S. Supreme Court would judge the case on whether sentencing a fourteen-year-old to life in prison without parole violates the Eight and Fourteenth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment (Carrizales & Schultz, n.d.). Miller’s counsel argued that sentencing a fourteen-year-old to life without parole without considering certain factors such as his age violates the Eight and Fourteenth Amendments’ ban on cruel and unusual punishment (Carrizales & Schultz, n.d.). The state of Alabama argued that punishing a fourteen-year-old to life without parole does not violate the Eight or Fourteenth Amendment, but serves a justifiable penological goal when the crime is aggravated murder (Carrizales & Schultz,…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Simmons, I disagree with the Supreme Court’s decision in favor of Simmons. I believe that Simmons deserves the death penalty, there was no reason in Simmons’ claims and agreement about how the execution of minors violate the prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. Yet, the defendant premeditated the crime and did not consider the victims’ life. The defendant enters into the victim’s home, robbed the victim, then tied up the victim and threw the victim off a bridge. In addition, the defendant stated that he assured that he would get away with the crime because he was minor.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Stanford v. Kentucky, the Supreme Court held that the implementation of the death penalty on criminals over the age of sixteen at the time of their crime did not violate the Eighth Amendment’s ban against cruel and unusual punishment. The Court ruled that the definition of cruel or unusual punishment hinged on said society's description of "evolving standards of decency." In Stanford vs. Kentucky, the Court found that the standards of decency did not reveal a clear national consensus against the use of the death penalty on capital offenders for crimes committed while the offender was over the age of sixteen. Thus, the belief that individual states maintained jurisdiction over the appropriate implementation of the death penalty was held…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gary Graham Case Study

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Over three centuries later, the Supreme Court established 16 as the very minimum age for an offender to be sentenced to death. Despite the courts recognition of the constitutionality of the practice,…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roper V. Simmons Essay

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kentucky as the basis for sentencing juveniles to death for murder. Prior to Roper v. Simmons Courts could issue juveniles under 18 but older than 15 death sentences for murder ("Juveniles and the Death Penalty," n.a., p. 1). Roper v. Simmons overruled Standard v. Kentucky thus making the sentencing anyone under the age of 18 when the crime was committed unconstitutional. In my opinion, in a case like Simmons, adult court is where the trial and sentencing needed to be held.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Re Gault Case Essay

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This case changed my outlook far as execution of juveniles. This case involved Simmons a young man that had a murder charge. I feel at age 17 you should be aware of our actions and with the fact that he bragged about the killing was an eye-opener to think of the possibility that this individual could have had mental issues or suffered some type of abuse as a youngster, that may have caused him to carry out this act of violence. I don’t feel he should have been executed due to these possibilities; however, a tough sentence should have been enacted. This case changed the development of sentencing anyone under the age of 18 to death it was ruled cruel and usual punishment.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Has the court sentenced the minor due to the evidence presented and the extent of the case? (Aggravated Murder). Miller argues, these amendments have been violated because of his age, while the state argues, the crime was determined aggravated murder, and so sentencing is justifiable and appropriate. Throughout the trail similar cases such as Roper v. Simmons (2005), and Graham v. Florida (2010), worked in Miller’s favor by using the information in the trail. Roper v. Simmons was a cased based on, if juveniles were able to be sentenced to the death penalty due to a murder.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juvenile delinquents are being incarcerated and given the same punishment as adults are given, there are different factors to why this is a continuous problem. Recidivism rates, the mental capacity of juveniles, and the rights a juvenile hold are reason to why this is a problem. In the Atkins v Virginia case, the supreme court ruled the mentally retarded being sentenced the death penalty as unconstitutional and cruel and unusual punishment, under the eight amendment. In correlation to the Atkins v Virginia case, is the Roper v Simmons case. The Roper v Simmons case ruled the death penalty for juveniles as cruel and unusual punishment because a child under eighteen years old is not mentally developed yet, therefor they fall under the same consideration…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Children committing heinous crimes are not a rare occurrence anymore; the upsetting reality requires new tactics for dealing with young juveniles. Some Americans believe children should be tried as adults, yet others feel that they are too young to understand their wrong doings. In most conditions minors are quickly told they are too young or too old for something, however before being sent to an adult facility we need to contemplate all aspects of the case in order to decided whether or not being tried as an adult is necessary. Regardless of the crime, some people feel that an adult facility is not a suitable environment for children to serve their sentences.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Equity Framework

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Lamentably, handguns are a gigantic factor in adolescent brutality these days. A different equity framework was set up, for minors that perpetuate wrongdoing years prior. The legal framework was executed, with the expectation of keeping adolescents that perpetuate wrongdoing from enduring harder disciplines as grown-ups and to help restore them exclusively on the young equity framework. Be that as it may, with the ascent in rough wrongdoings by youth a few courts are currently giving adolescents harsher condemning and furthermore putting incredible worry on the well-being of people in general. In either case, the preeminent court of the U. S. decided that death penalty for a person that had conferred an offense that was less than 18 years old was merciless and strange discipline and was likewise taboo by the Constitution.…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marin Sinzer Case Study

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    While the “criminal is a child” approach to the juvenile justice system is appealing due to its forgiving nature and emphasis on rehabilitation rather than punishment, there are some cases in which this decision is not so cut-and-dry. One of these instances of a legal “gray area” is the case of Marin Sinzer, who was charged for the murder of Tammy Shevin, 25 years after the crime was committed. The now 38 year old is petitioning to be tried as a juvenile, since he was only 13 at the time of the crime, a year younger than the waiver age at the time. While many proponents of the “criminal is a child” approach take that stance because of the physical and psychological dangers posed to juveniles who are placed in adult prisons, in this unique…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article raises the issue of whether young murder suspects should be tried as adults, as a result of cases in Massachusetts and how the State is going to handle the issue following the United States Supreme Court ruling that an Alabama law that gave juveniles convicted of murder mandatory life sentences without the possibility of parole was unconstitutional. Massachusetts law had anyone 14 years or older accused of murder be tried as an adult, the article at the time debated the next move the State’s Judicial Court will make. DISCUSSION While the article focuses on severe crime by juveniles, it sparks the broader debate as to whether juveniles should be tried in adult courts at all. This issue is important to me because our criminal justice system clearly distinguishes between adults and juveniles and has made juveniles court system different from adult court.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The decision of juveniles being tried as adults in the world of criminal justice has usually been an object of controversy. Some agree that an adolescent who commits a serious crime like murder deserves to be penalized exactly like an adult; while others declare that a minor should not face the same punishment as an adult. However, no matter how severe or appalling a crime may be, juveniles should not be tried as adults; the reason being that everyone should be granted the chance to learn from their mistakes. Juveniles should not be punished as adults, simply because they biologically distinct from adults. Teenagers are the midsection between children and adults.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    Routledge, doi:10.1080/07418820701294805 Langemo, Bree. “Serious Consequences for Serious Juvenile Offenders: Do Juveniles Belong in Adult Court?” Ohio Northern University Law Review, vol. 19, no. 30, 2004, http://www.lexisnexis.com/lnacui2api/api/version1/getDocCui?lni=4CC1-J0G0-00CW-4018&csi=140724&hl=t&hv=t&hnsd=f&hns=t&hgn=t&oc=00240&perma=true. Levitt, Lacey.…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Brilliant Essays