The Discourse On Method By Rene Descarte Analysis

Improved Essays
Many people look to gain more knowledge throughout their lives either to invent new technology, understand how it is exactly that certain things function, or to just be up to date on the things going on in the world. The idea of gaining more knowledge is something that does not just happen in our society today but has occurred all throughout history. René Descartes was one of the people in the late 1500’s and early 1600’s who wanted to be able to acquire as much knowledge as possible, but wanted it to be knowledge that was backed up by facts. In “The Discourse on Method” René Descartes provides four rules in order to be able to gain better knowledge. These four rules are rules that have given people a guide to follow when looking toward gaining …show more content…
This means that if he did not have enough information to back up what he was studying or trying to understand he would not accept it. He would only accept until he saw himself that it was proven. This is something that not only affected the people during his time but has also affected many of the generations that have followed. Descartes rule made people realize that they believed things that were not backed up by evidence. During this time people might have decided to start looking to prove their ideas, ask questions, and not just believe what they were told but to look for evidence. This idea of not believing until one sees is something that happens even today, people talk about not believing until they see something with their own eyes. Descartes second rule was to “divide each of his difficulties into as many portions as were possible as it was required for their solution” (Descartes, 1637). This means that when Descartes was having difficulty understanding or solving something he separated it and tried to solve it one by one and not altogether. He didn’t just look for one solution but looked for many options to see which would give the best result. This rule showed people to not just consider one way to solve and issue, but to consider all of the possible ways to solve it as well as the effects and which solution had the best …show more content…
This means that he would write things down, look closely at the material, and in many places so that he would not miss anything that was important. This shows that Descartes did not just look to one source for information, but considered many different options. This showed people that when trying to learn and comprehend something it was important to consider other works and places than just one source. This is an idea that is used by many people today, especially during research, people don’t just consider one source they compare many sources to make sure that the information is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In order to do this he uses what is referred to as the method of doubt. (Broughton, 2003) Descartes’ method of doubt is to analyse and reject every belief that it is possible to cast the slightest of doubt upon. This method was not to look at every belief separately but to look at…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Descartes “Evil Deceiver” argument he argues that an evil demon is the source of our deception rather than an omnipotent God. The strongest argument that Descartes presents is the idea that our senses cannot be trusted as the world around us and everything we experience is a constructed illusion. In this paper, I will argue that this argument can be seen as sound as our senses can not be trusted because they are unreliable. In “Meditation I: What Can be Called Into Doubt” Descartes explains to us that the information we are receiving through our senses isn’t inherently accurate.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will argue that Descartes, using his own criteria for making and avoiding mistakes, cannot be making a mistake when he proves the existence of God in meditation three in his Meditations on First Philosophy. I will develop my argument in two parts. First, I will present Descartes’s argument for how mistakes are made and avoided.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes believed that all we can know is information that we are certain of. Knowledge with any amount of skepticism, according to Descartes, proves to be unreliable and thus, not real knowledge. Therefore, he further stated that the knowledge obtained through the senses is not real knowledge because the senses can be deceiving and biased to individuals. Descartes even is skeptical of concepts such as math because he believed that one is just told that two plus three is five, but one cannot be certain. According to Descartes, an "evil genius of the utmost power and cunning has employed all his energies in order to deceive me."…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rene Descartes’ statement, “I at least know for certain that nothing is certain” perfectly illustrates the multiple problems that arise when all rational beings realize that their senses can deceive them and that the very foundation of their knowledge is based on the assumption that everything they encounter is real. Thankfully, being aware of the problem is the first step in solving it. The juxtaposition of Rene Descartes and William Shakespeare reveals a difference of opinion when they set out to examine and solve the problems that arise from the doubtfulness of the knowledge provided by our senses. Although both authors agree on the importance of solitude and the potential problem of an evil genius manipulating our senses, Descartes’ use…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues that the only aspect of life, a person, can know for sure is that they are a thinking being. Any other sense data can be argued as devised. This paper will defend Descartes views and show that almost anything can be questioned. In 1619, Descartes decided to throw out all the knowledge he perceived with his senses.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes gives three arguments to try and make himself believe that all his thoughts, beliefs and previous knowledge is nonexistent or has no value. He is trying to convince himself that he knows nothing. I think this is a rather difficult task to perform considering that no matter what you try to do to convince yourself of something you will always go back to your old thoughts and beliefs. It is just how our minds work.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes states that because of this we must break down everything we know and find a base to our knowledge, an unquestionable principal. He continues on to say that because of this we should not trust anything that has previously deceived us and consider what we hold to be true by this. Descartes says that there are many ways that our senses that provide impressions, as Hume would put it, will deceive us. For example, because man has the ability to dream while a sleep, how is that we know we are awake this very second. The same goes for our sight; from far away we may think there is water in the distance on a very hot day but as we get closer we realize that our visual sense have mislead us.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes uses perfection in this manner to appeal to his audience and further his argument about the importance of thinking and…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    IHUM 202 Name¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬_______________Nhi Tran__________________ Reading Questions A Discourse on Method 1. As he meditates on and develops his method for finding scientific truths, Descartes debates whether he should sweep away old notions (existing knowledge and philosophies) or build upon them. Which option does he reason is the most effective for him and why?…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a young kid, you’re told many different things that you believe to be true. You have no reason to think that people would deceive you by telling you things that aren’t really accurate. As you grow older, you continue to base all of your opinions in life on the beliefs that you are taught as a kid. But, it is very possible that all of the things that you are taught as a kid could be false, and maybe, you don’t actually know anything. That’s what Descartes began to question.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The innate ideas proposed by Descartes must be learned through a proper method such as utilitarian schooling, as one cannot possibly understand all things about the world at…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What matters to Descartes is certainty in knowledge, living a food life by religion and bringing religion back into people’s…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays