Reign Of Terror Justified Dbq Analysis

Improved Essays
How far should we go to be in peace and equilibrium with one another? Before the start of the French Revolution, the French had and unfair and unjust democracy. However, a group of powerful men took the idea of a more equal government too far. 1793 marks the beginning of the Reign of Terror, which includes the execution of outrageous numbers of innocent citizens and enemies. The question is: were these methods used to achieve a government full of liberty and equality justified? These methods were in fact not justified for multiple reasons.
External Threats from Foreign countries in no way justify the Reign of Terror. It was a reasonable action for Austria and Prussia to form an alliance to stop the French Revolution (Doc. A). If word of the Revolution would have spread to their countries, they would have a very big problem to deal with that would cost their countries millions and spread violence throughout their countries. Austria was also concerned about Queen Antoinette’s safety, which they had reason to be concerned about
…show more content…
In October 1793, Revolutionaries destroyed 1600 homes and chopped off 12 heads in five minutes (Doc. C). The reason Revolutionaries did this was just to make an example of counterrevolutionaries, which is a very lame reason to set citizens’ homes on fire and to murder 12 innocent people. Historians estimate that anywhere between 80,000 and 500,000 French people on both sides died in the Vendee in 1793 (Doc. C). France was destroying itself from the inside out due to their fear of the internal threats. People in Vendee fought against a Revolutionary military draft called levee en masse and against laws that tried to abolish Christianity in France (Doc. C). French Government officials shouldn’t be sending out military drafts to kill their own people, let alone rid the French citizens of their freedom of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Terror was not simply the moment at which the French government unleashed its violence against its own people. The Terror, as it was seen during the Revolution itself, was rather a way by which one chose to think; it was, in essence, a rejection of monarchy and a willingness to proclaim full separation from the former rulers of the nation. This notion was perceived as an effort to intimidate the upper classes to enforce a new ideological era, not simply to employ physical violence against suspicious individuals. When Robespierre famously proclaimed that virtue and terror needed to be combined during the French Revolution, his message was not intended to be a justification of outright cruelty, but instead a compelling commentary on precisely how intimidation needed be used to threaten the royalist ideology. Indeed, while this was the valid historical use of the term, many abused its connotations and took it upon themselves to officiate a barbarous corporeal war against the French Republic’s supposed…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite the apparent need for the revolution, there is no reason that such a horrid event like the Reign of Terror was justified. The Reign of Terror was not justified because it caused more foreign hostility, it involved an abysmal manner of determining who was executed or not and it caused damage within the country itself. Firstly, the Reign of Terror caused hatred towards France among foreign countries. Austria and Prussia did not want the Terror to spread to their countries so they decided to preemptively take action.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reign Of Terror Dbq Essay

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This argues that the Reign of Terror was necessary to rescue France from invasion. The Austrians invaded because Queen Marie Antoinette was killed because she was convicted by the Revolutionary Tribunal of high treason, and executed by guillotine on the Place de la Révolution on October 16, 1793. Queen Marie Antoinette was also the daughter of Leopold II, who was the king of Austria. There is no doubt the Reign of terror had many negative impacts on society, however it was essential for France’s survival.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Reign of Terror was a brutal time period during the French Revolution. It involved countless unnecessary deaths made by the officials. The executioners used the guillotine, or a beheading machine, to kill anyone who seemed suspicious, without being accused of anything. “Historians estimate that more than 80,000 French people on both sides died…” (Doc. C)…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reign Of Terror DBQ

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Reign Of Terror is not justified because of three major reasons: threats did not require the Reign of Terror, the methods were too extreme, and the Reign of Terror did not support the ideals…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1791 the Bill of Rights created the first ten amendments to the constitution. The First Amendment was the most important to Americans because it prohibit any unusual or cruel punishments. It declared “that certain rights shall not construed to deny or regard others retained by people”. But the Bill of Rights did not change much, the American still fight for first amendment right so came the French Revolution, it was twenty-six years before Europe collapsed. The church was attacked because it violated freedom of religion and freedom of speech.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ali McCowin Mr. Picazo History, Per. 5 6 January 2016 Was the Reign of Terror Justified? The Reign of Terror was a significant time in the French Revolution impacting the nation and killing many individuals. The Reign of Terror lasted less than two years. During that time, the Revolution was in extreme debt, due to wars.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many historians have found it difficult to precisely define a reason as to what caused ‘The Terror,’ this is due to it being a culmination of terrible events leading to tyranny. ‘The Terror’ can be defined as the period within 1793 and 1794, when the Robespierre subjugated Jacobian group executed, without remorse, any opposing citizens to their regime. Through the critical analysis of Maximilien Robespierre’s speech ‘On the moral and political principles of domestic policy’ in conjunction with Revolutionary France written by Furet Francois and other secondary sources, this essay will argue the differing perspectives provided by historians to discover a definitive cause to ‘The Terror’ through a common relationship that it holds with the theme of virtue. The context of this period being, the Industrial…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was the Reign of Terror, a time of depression and tremendous agony, a reasonable act? In the eyes of many, it was not reasonable due to all the effects it brought among the country of France. Therefore it is clear that the Reign of Terror was not justified, because…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Reign of Terror: Was it Justified? The French Revolution was an important movement in world history. It marked the first time that the lowest class in a country had overthrown the highest class. In France, the Third Estate had decided that they had had enough of unfair taxes and inequality, and so they wrote the Declaration of the Rights of Man and forced the king at the time, Louis XVI, to share power with the National Assembly.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    One comparable result of these revolutions were the execution programs that emerged from them. In France, a program called the Reign of Terror, led by Maximilen Robespierre, had started. The purpose of this program was to institute a policy of fear or terror in those who dared to counter revolt. Although this began as a period of trials against those who seemed to oppose the revolution, it quickly altered into morbid confrontations where those accused were not allowed to defend themselves. Many were killed through the use of guillotine, an execution method of beheading.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was The Reign Of Terror Justified? From 1789 to 1800 a time of revolution took place in France to end monarchy and finally give more power to the people. During the revolution, an era of revolts and many deaths, but also new ideas and extraordinary steps to a much needed government, the era of the Reign of Terror. The bloodiest time in the French Revolution, lead by many people such as Robespierre, an educated man that spoke on the behalf of the people and spread ideas and actions for a better government.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though Robespierre killed thousands of people, he believed he did it for the sake of the people to form a new government. As he stated, “Terror is nothing other than justice, prompt, severe, inflexible; it is therefore an emanation of virtue; it is not so much a special principle as it is a consequence of the general principle of democracy applied to our country 's most urgent needs” (Terror and Virtue Letter). The Reign of Terror ended when the citizens put Robespierre on trial and executed him in 1794. Even with many deaths, fears, and changes…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The loss of so many lives in the French Revolution was not worth it. The deaths were of many people who were innocent, as they were not involved in the revolution. France became obsessed with violence, as this became their main focus. Concluding the revolution, the deaths did not benefit the outcome of France.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Origins of Nationalism- Source Interpretation “Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains.” This was first said by Jean Jacques Rousseau in 1762, and is attributed to helping ignite the spark that started the French Revolution. The people in France during and after this period of time had vastly differing ideals on nationalism and the revolution. Some feared their increased nationalism and the revolution would not help them at all, while others defended it to their last dying breath. These statements bring up of the question: to what extent did the French revolution succeed in uniting the people and bringing about a better society?…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays