The Great Depression, starting in 1929, was the greatest catastrophe in the history market systems that left a magnitude of people in poverty, while also lowering global GDP and creating an overall economic downfall. It all began with the great crash, occurring on October 29th, 1929, as the stock market disintegrated into fragments resulting in millions discovering that their paper gains had become nothing. There were many reactions and towards the looming event as economists attempted to find a resolution in order to soothe the dilemma. The various reactions and outcomes of the Great Depression helped to shape economic theory, social life, and people’s views of a market economy in general. In order to determine the extent of these various
…show more content…
The period between post World War II and the 1970s is known as the Golden Age of Economics due to the large scale economic boom occurring within the United States. High productivity and innovation throughout this period was credited towards Keynesian economics as its theories proved to be successful in rising prosperity. The Keynesian economics were quite successful for many years, but failed when put against the many economic problems of the 1970s. Because of this, by 1981, the US transitioned to a new system of economics in order to become more globalized and business …show more content…
Reagan’s plan included reducing the growth of government spending, regulation, and federal income tax, while also tightening the supply of money to reduce inflation. The system was very effective by lowering barriers to the production of goods and services, while also investing in capital. In contrast, Reaganomics is quite the opposite of Keynesian economics as it advocates for less government spending, whereas Keynes advocates for high government involvement. Reaganomics attempted to tighten the control of money to expand the economy, whereas Keynesian economics attempted to loosen the control of money to expand the economy. Despite their key differences, both provided substantial economic growth within the US economy and allowed for high levels of production through different means of doing so. In short, both economic systems led to considerable economic growth after ample economic problems, and although the two eras possessed different forms of execution, both created the same intended outcome of economic growth and
The period between post World War II and the 1970s is known as the Golden Age of Economics due to the large scale economic boom occurring within the United States. High productivity and innovation throughout this period was credited towards Keynesian economics as its theories proved to be successful in rising prosperity. The Keynesian economics were quite successful for many years, but failed when put against the many economic problems of the 1970s. Because of this, by 1981, the US transitioned to a new system of economics in order to become more globalized and business …show more content…
Reagan’s plan included reducing the growth of government spending, regulation, and federal income tax, while also tightening the supply of money to reduce inflation. The system was very effective by lowering barriers to the production of goods and services, while also investing in capital. In contrast, Reaganomics is quite the opposite of Keynesian economics as it advocates for less government spending, whereas Keynes advocates for high government involvement. Reaganomics attempted to tighten the control of money to expand the economy, whereas Keynesian economics attempted to loosen the control of money to expand the economy. Despite their key differences, both provided substantial economic growth within the US economy and allowed for high levels of production through different means of doing so. In short, both economic systems led to considerable economic growth after ample economic problems, and although the two eras possessed different forms of execution, both created the same intended outcome of economic growth and