The Anti Federalist were a group of people who feared that the central government would have entirely too much power. They didn't like the fact that there would be a person incharge of nations. They also feared that the congress would misfortune the…
Prior to either the making or the ratification of the Constitution, the delegates from the Conventional Convention met together in agreement of revising the Articles of Confederation due to its ineffectiveness. Instead of simply doing so, they created a new form of government; Constitution. Although it was created, the Constitution wasn’t established as the “law of the land” just yet. Congress had to not only propose this new document to the states, but also convince them to ratify it. The US Constitution included components that allowed the states of the Union to agree to its ratification.…
Patrick Henry at a Debate in the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 5 1788, and James Madison, in the Federalist, Number 10, 1787 represent two different perspectives on the ratification of the constitution. Anti-federalists and federalists were opposing forces in the ratification process. Anti-federalists wanted to prevent the constitution from being ratified while the federalists favored a strong central government and the passage of the constitution. Anti-federalists were against the ratification of the constitution. They feared the constitution could lead to autocratic tyranny.…
It didn't make sense for the National Government to have more power leaving the states weak. They also believed that the power among the three branches was not equally divided. The Anti-Federalist were more for the people, more of which were farmers and small landowners. More and more the Anti-Federalist believed that the Federalist were more interested in a aristocratic society which would be at the expense of the commoners of the colonies. Now the way the Federalist won over the ratification of the Constitution was that James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton wrote The Federalist Papers which helped convinced some people to ratify the Constitution.…
The Anti-Federalists, who opposed the ratification of the Constitution,…
The Federalists were those in favor of the Constitution and included John Hancock, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and John Adams. A large number of Federalists were elites, landowners, bankers, and bigtime businessmen. The Anti-Federalists were those in favor of the Articles of Confederation and included George Mason, Thomas Paine, Patrick Henry, and Samuel Adams. The Anti-Federalist party were mainly a group of middle-class farmers and small time businessmen. Even though both groups wanted some form of government, the right to vote, and wanted congress to make treaties and the right to declare war, there are many things they both disagreed on.…
Congress decided their current form of government, the Articles of Confederation, had many flaws. It was too weak to stop things such as Shay’s Rebellion. Because of this they organized a convention, many state representatives showed up, but some did not because they were pleased with how it was and didn’t want to change this. The people who were against changing the Articles of Confederation are called Anti-Federalists, and people that were for this are called Federalists. As a Federalist I believe the people of the United States should ratify the Constitution because we would fall to pieces without it.…
When the delegates were ratifying the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. began to divide over whether the constitution was a really that great for the country or not. There were Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Federalists supported the constitution, and the Anti-Federalists were against it. The Federalists were supporters of the U.S. Constitution because they needed a strong central government to protect their country.…
Although the Federalist shard many of the same ideas of the Antifederalist such as individual rights (Oaks 223). The Anti-Federalists shared different view on how the government should be ran. Because of their experiences with the tyranny of Great Britain, they feared the establishment of a strong national government. The Anti-Federalists also did not accept the use of separation of powers and checks and balances, because they feared the branches of government would abuse the power and not serve the purpose of protecting the rights and freedoms of the individuals. It was evident in the way they thought things should be ran and why they thought they where right, being that they where from a old-line of republicans and did not favor a system…
In the early days of American history, many of the founding fathers took precautions while writing the Constitution. The reasons these precautions were taken was so that the people of the United States wouldn’t be oppressed because of any amendments or rules. There were many opinions on why/why not the constitution should be supported. However, the Constitution was altered so that we would be truly and undeniably free from oppression. Federalists and anti-federalists have many good and acceptable reasons on their beliefs.…
The federalist of the Constitution were the people who supported it. The anti-federalist were those who went against it. Federalist thought that the Constitution was based on federalism. The anti-federalist believed that the Constitution took too much power away from the states and did not insured rights for the people. The federalists even wrote essays to answer the anti-federalist attacks to the Constitution.…
The Federalists are who instated the foundation for what our country is. Both the Federalists and Anti-Federalists had an opinions on how the nation should exist. However, the ideals of each group conflicted on multiple levels. Originally, the first draft for a constitution was established by the Articles of Confederation in 1778 (Kramnick, pg155). This was a document to draft laws for the newly independent states.…
Two of the major leaders of this group were Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson, who was overseas during this time. The Anti-Federalists thought that under the Articles people had the rights that they rightfully deserved. Under the Articles, the poor people benefitted greatly. During the process of trying to get the new Constitution ratified the Anti-Federalists felt that under this new government the rich had all of the power instead of the people (Doc 5). Under the Articles the states had the power to make laws and do whatever they pleased, and to some of the states the idea of changing to a government that the central government had all the power was absolutely absurd.…
In regards to those in favor of the Constitution, Federalists were those who viewed the…
This would allow for the government to do things that aren't listed within the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists were opposed to this. They wanted a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Some examples of Anti-Federalists are George Mason and John Hancock. Anti-Federalists by definition are a political party that wanted the power of the individual state to be greater than the power of the central government, and a strict interpretation of the constitution promoted this.…