1B, 1C, 2A) that TAP and σR4 contact the -35 promoter from different faces of the DNA double stranded helix. An important observation here is that TAP binding the -35 region distorts the DNA so that it’s turned 20° away from σR4 when compared to RPo without TAP. Thus, only 2 instead of 3 σR4 residues contact the -35 promoter, and this leads to 2 instead of 4 DNA bases contacted. This corroborates the observation that the recognition specificity of -35 region DNA sequences is smaller than in transcription lacking activators. Fig 2A shows the σR4 resitues that contact the -35 promoter DNA, and we can see that site-directed mutagenesis of these two residues to alanine (σR584A and σE585A) decreases RPo complex formation
1B, 1C, 2A) that TAP and σR4 contact the -35 promoter from different faces of the DNA double stranded helix. An important observation here is that TAP binding the -35 region distorts the DNA so that it’s turned 20° away from σR4 when compared to RPo without TAP. Thus, only 2 instead of 3 σR4 residues contact the -35 promoter, and this leads to 2 instead of 4 DNA bases contacted. This corroborates the observation that the recognition specificity of -35 region DNA sequences is smaller than in transcription lacking activators. Fig 2A shows the σR4 resitues that contact the -35 promoter DNA, and we can see that site-directed mutagenesis of these two residues to alanine (σR584A and σE585A) decreases RPo complex formation