DECISION
It is noted in the file that the listed items of a foreign judgment (pages.10/11), among those, the one that sets forth for the return to the use of maiden name of M DE L S D, are crossed out, so it is assumed that they were made void.
That said, it is ordered to notify the parties within thirty (30) days, to clarify the aforesaid erasure, bringing to the file a new foreign judgment that the parties are seeking the approval, without any erasures, allowing to infer clearly what was decided by the US Court. It is noteworthy, for appropriate, that said document must be accompanied by the necessary Brazilian consular seal and translation made by a certified professional in Brazil.
It is noted in the file that the "amended final judgment …show more content…
55, published on 03/18/2016. If there is no response, it is ordered to suspend the file, pursuant to the sole paragraph of art. 216-E, of the RISTJ.
AFFIDAVIT
My name is MARIA DE LOURDES SANTOS DIAS. I was born on April 4, 1968 in XXXXXX, State of XXXXXX, Brazil. I currently live at XXXXXXXXXX. I am the Defendant in the Civil Action – Complaint for Divorce – Docket Number FM-07-458-14, filed by the Plaintiff, Mr. CELIO FERREIRA DIAS, with the SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY – CHANCERY DIVISION- FAMILY PART – ESSEX COUNTY. Hereby I state as follows: That I am filing this motion in order to obtain the approval of the FINAL JUDGMENT OF DIVORCE by the Superior Tribunal of Justice in Brazil; That on December 12, 2013 the FINAL JUDGMENT OF DIVORCE – Pro Se, of the above mentioned civil action was issued by Hon. Donald A. Kessler, J.S.C., where the item 4: permission to resume my maiden name: MARIA DE LOURDES SANTOS along with other items was crossed out making them void; That on August 27, 2015 the magistrate, Hon. Francisco Falcao, Judge President of the Superior Tribunal of Justice in Brasilia, requested a new foreign judgment in order to clarify the
It is noted in the file that the listed items of a foreign judgment (pages.10/11), among those, the one that sets forth for the return to the use of maiden name of M DE L S D, are crossed out, so it is assumed that they were made void.
That said, it is ordered to notify the parties within thirty (30) days, to clarify the aforesaid erasure, bringing to the file a new foreign judgment that the parties are seeking the approval, without any erasures, allowing to infer clearly what was decided by the US Court. It is noteworthy, for appropriate, that said document must be accompanied by the necessary Brazilian consular seal and translation made by a certified professional in Brazil.
It is noted in the file that the "amended final judgment …show more content…
55, published on 03/18/2016. If there is no response, it is ordered to suspend the file, pursuant to the sole paragraph of art. 216-E, of the RISTJ.
AFFIDAVIT
My name is MARIA DE LOURDES SANTOS DIAS. I was born on April 4, 1968 in XXXXXX, State of XXXXXX, Brazil. I currently live at XXXXXXXXXX. I am the Defendant in the Civil Action – Complaint for Divorce – Docket Number FM-07-458-14, filed by the Plaintiff, Mr. CELIO FERREIRA DIAS, with the SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY – CHANCERY DIVISION- FAMILY PART – ESSEX COUNTY. Hereby I state as follows: That I am filing this motion in order to obtain the approval of the FINAL JUDGMENT OF DIVORCE by the Superior Tribunal of Justice in Brazil; That on December 12, 2013 the FINAL JUDGMENT OF DIVORCE – Pro Se, of the above mentioned civil action was issued by Hon. Donald A. Kessler, J.S.C., where the item 4: permission to resume my maiden name: MARIA DE LOURDES SANTOS along with other items was crossed out making them void; That on August 27, 2015 the magistrate, Hon. Francisco Falcao, Judge President of the Superior Tribunal of Justice in Brasilia, requested a new foreign judgment in order to clarify the