New York Penal Law: Case Study

Improved Essays
QUESTIONS PRESENTED

1. Under New York Penal Law, false statements or failure to disclose material facts may result in denial of an application to the bar. William Gould admits to withholding information on his application for admission to the New York State Bar, and has no intention of remedying these omissions. Given that Mr. Gould has left important information from his bar application, is he likely to be admitted to practice law in the state of New York?

2. Mr. Gould has divulged information to us that he did not include in his application to the New York State Bar. Mr. Gould further claims that he has no intention of telling the truth regarding these matters during his upcoming hearing before the Character and Fitness Committee. In light
…show more content…
Gould was held in the bookstore after trying to shoplift a book. Letter from William Gould to Bernard Murphy, Esq., Murphy, Daugherty, and Smith, LLP. (September 1, 2016) (on file with Murphy, Daugherty, and Smith, LLP.). The police were called, but before they made an arrest the store owner decided to let Mr. Gould off with only a warning. Id. Mr. Gould did not disclose this information on his bar application, nor is required to do so. The bar application asks specifically for arrests, convictions, and citations, but makes no mention of detentions. N.Y. Bar Application, F (2010). In this particular instance, Mr. Gould was detained but not actually arrested or convicted of any crime. Similar to the issue surrounding Ms. Fisher’s drug dealing allegations, Mr. Gould should not be held accountable for failing to disclose this information on his application. He should, however, be prepared to answer questions about this detainment truthfully in the event that the Committee asks if there is any relevant information he would like to disclose that was not included anywhere in the bar …show more content…
Gould’s initial letter seeking legal advice and representation is protected by the aforementioned attorney-client privilege. Here, because Mr. Gould has not waived his right to the privilege, the information revealed in his initial correspondence with this firm cannot be used against him, including the information that he plans to lie to the Committee about. N.Y. C.P.L.R.(a)(1) (McKinney 2016). The best that this firm could do would be to suggest that Mr. Gould amend his application to the bar and be truthful at his Committee hearing, both of which we cannot compel him to actually do. Expanding on this premise, this firm can choose not to represent Mr. Gould on the grounds that it believes his actions to be criminal or fraudulent. N.Y. Jud. Law (1.16)(c)(2) (McKinney 2016). The fact that the firm has knowledge of Mr. Gould’s intentions to suppress evidence that he has a legal obligation to reveal or produce to the Appellate Division on his bar application is the foundation on which representation should be refused. N.Y. Jud. Law (3.4)(a)(1) (McKinney

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Stevan Jakovljevic Professor Avdeev Law 2010-05 Fall 2016 Case Brief Term Researched: Duty of Care Case Name: Howard D. Brunson (Plaintiff-Respondent) v. Affinity Federal Credit Union Legal Citation: 954 A.2d 550 (N.J. Super. App. Div. 2008) Date Decided:…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ec-1.3 Vs Aba

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lawyer Howe violated Rule 1.3 of ABA's law not to act reasonably and quickly to represent clients because he did not exist. He also violated Rule 5.5 (b) of the Aba Act after Karl told him that he had a new case and did not appropriately respond to Karl's proceedings. Carl failed to present himself and his place as a quasi-legal who violates EC-1.7 (a). Carl accepted the case he agreed with the client on all fees and gave them legal advice, and this was not acceptable and unauthorized of the law violating EC-1.8 (a). Carl inadvertently revealed the other client's information by allowing Zeke to use the phone as the documents were in the scenery.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the judgement of Mason CJ and McHugh J, it was said that a “ trial judge who is faced with an application for an adjournment or a stay by an indigent accused charged with a serious offence [...] the trial in such a case should be adjourned, postponed or stayed until legal representation is available. The judgement also stated that “an accused has the right to a fair trial and that, depending on all the circumstances of the particular case, lack of representation may mean that an accused is unable to receive, or did not receive, a fair trial. “ Moreover, the judgement of Deane and Gaudron suggested that the right to receive counsel was found in the Constitution, specifically Chapter Three which requires that ‘judicial process and fairness be observed.’ However, both Justice Brennan and Justice Dawson dissented, stating that it would unjust for judges to adjourn or stay trial due to the pressures it would place on legal aid agencies. For Dietrich, the outcome of the High Court case meant that without the legal representation he had required for the trial and due to the trial judge’s failure to grant an adjournment, a miscarriage of justice had occurred.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In August 1965, Robert Gardner appeared before a grand jury which was investigating alleged bribery activity involving, police corruption in connection with illegal gambling operations. Gardner was advised that the Grand Jury elected to examine him concerning the performance of his required duties. Robert was asked to sign a waiver of immunity and his privilege against self- incrimination was also explained. Robert was…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R Vs Misaac Case Study

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    (para. 31) ISSUES a) Did the trial judge speculate beyond what was reasonable? b) Did the trial judge reverse the onus of proof? c) Did the trial judge make a mistake in not considering that the defence might have honestly believed that consent had been given even if that was a mistake? (para.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Agurs, the Supreme Court had expanded the rule by recognizing a duty to disclose exculpatory information even in the absence of a specific request for it, and the prosecutor failed to disclose this information that violated the defendants due process clause. In this case the female defendant testified self-defense with the stabling of her male acquaintance in a hotel room. She was then convicted of second degree murder. After the conviction of her trail the defendant had learned that the prosecutor failed to disclose this information at the trial of the victim (male acquaintance) having guilty pleas to assault and weapons possession charges. The prosecution failed to mention to the court and jury of the victims’ previous criminal background in the trial (Judge,…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The instance of Mr. Gideon was conceded certiorari, and along these lines the instance of Betts v. Brady, 316 U.S. 455, would be the integral component. On account of Betts, the litigant was arraigned for ransacking a bank, and hence asked for the avail of guidance to verbalize with him in court because of the way that he didn't have any mazuma. In the province where the offense transpired, it was not the act of the judges to delegate counsel for litigants unless the charge was assault or murder, so the solicitation was gainsaid. After the tribulation, where the litigant argued not blameworthy and set aside an ideal opportunity to verbalize with himself, he was discovered liable at a seat tribulation and sentenced to eight years in confinement. He petitioned for discharge by denotes of habeas corpus, referring to that he had been precluded the avail from claiming prosperous advice as required under the Fourteenth Amendment.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Koenig writes an article in the Baltimore Sun about Gutierrez after she was disbarred from law for mishandling client’s money. Gutierrez was Syed’s defense lawyer. Therefore, Koenig is suspicious of Syed’s defense lawyer, before her investigation begins. Koenig states in her introduction: “I used to be a reporter for the Baltimore Sun, and she'd come across some stories I'd written about a well-known defense attorney in Baltimore who'd been disbarred for mishandling client money. That attorney was the same person who defended Adnan, her last major trial, in fact.”…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William E. Christie is a shareholder/director with Shaheen & Gordon, PA. Mr. Christie defends clients throughout the greater Concord, New Hampshire, area in criminal and civil cases, and he also represents clients in complex civil litigations. Most of his criminal cases involve defending clients charged with federal crimes, including fraud, tax evasion, drug offenses and obstruction of justice. He also has significant experience defending clients with crimes in the state courts, including embezzlement, driving while intoxicated, negligent homicide and environmental offenses. Mr. Christie has obtained favorable outcomes for numerous clients in suits against the federal government, such as a judgment of $3.1 million for the family of an informant…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    opened with the officer advising him of the Miranda Rights in great detail (FindLaw, n.d.). Michael C. requested to have his probation officer present during the interview when the officer advised him of his right to have an attorney present. The request was denied by the officer, who then again advised Michael C. of his right to have an attorney present during the questioning. The offer to have an attorney present was ultimately refused by Michael C., as he agreed to answer questions without an attorney present. The officer began questioning Michael C. about the murder, a statement as well as sketched were obtained from the interview which incriminates the suspect of the crimes (Elrod & Ryder,…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nine young African American men, later known as the Scottsboro boys, by names of Haywood Patterson, Clarence Norris, Andy Wright, Roy Wright, Ozzie Powell, Willie Roberson, Charles Weems, Eugene Williams, and Olen Montgomery jumped aboard a empty freight train that was going through Alabama. Seven white young men along with two white women, Victoria Price and Ruby Bates, have also jumped aboard on the train for transport throughout Alabama. A fight has happened between the two groups and six of the white men have been thrown off the train. The white men were furious so they decided to send a message ahead to the town of Scottsboro to report what happened. The local sheriff and a group of citizens stopped the train before it could reach Scottsboro and the two white woman have declared that they have been raped by the African American men.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Lawrence Brosseau's Trial

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This quote proves that the lawyer does not use any effort to try and communicate with him and is not trying his hardest to help him win the case. The lawyer also did not tell Brosseau the consequences of his plea and said he did not know…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The courts biggest issues were trying to decide whether a trial court’s erroneous deprivation of a criminal defendant’s choice of counsel entitles him to a reversal of his conviction and should proving the sixth Amendment right to proceed with the counsel of choice depend on whether the deprivation of that right also resulted in compromising a defendants’ right to a fair trial. The majority opinion did not apply the Strickland test because they felt that the defendant could not show or give any reason as to why he felt the counsel was ineffective and that the counsels performance was poorly presented and deficient and the defendant was prejudiced by it. What the Strickland test is actually intended for is that the government must contend that the defendant must at least demonstrate that his counsel of choice would have pursued a different strategy and would have created a :reasonable probability”. In court cases the course can be split into two structures; trial errors and structural errors. Most constitutional errors are trial errors that occur “during the presentation to the jury,” and courts have discretion in deciding whether these trial errors are harmless and warrant a new trial.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    COMPLAINT On June 2, 2016, the Office of the Bar Counsel received a complaint from Lynette Fast Horse regarding Attorney Paul T. Shane. The complainant, a former employee, believes that Shane has failed to appropriately handle immigration matters. Fast Horse alleges that Murray is in violation of Mass.R.Prof. C. 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, and 8.4(c).…

    • 2269 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1. The purposes of criminal punishment can simply be divided into two schools of thought: retributionists and preventionists. Identify, define, and discuss the several criminal law key term words that are associated with these two schools of thought and conclude with your opinion of which is the most effective.....or why all are concurrently effective. Be thorough since this is important concerning the purposes of punishment in a modern society. 1.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays