Pros And Cons Of Citizens United V. Federal Election Commission

Decent Essays
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which occurred in 2010, is a standout amongst the most misconstrued U.S. Preeminent Court choices of cutting edge times. A standard, sensible decision, Citizens United by one means or another turned into a lightning bar for revolutionaries, would-be blue pencils and fanatic hacks over the political range. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a point of interest 5-to-4 choices by the United States Supreme Court that corporate financing of independent political programs in hopeful races can't be restricted, on the grounds that doing as such would be in resistance with the First Amendment. The choice came about because of the non-benefit company Citizens United's case under the watchful

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    A federal made a serious and urgent request in court to refuse to block a lower court decision and strikes down restrictions on the early weekend voting. Which was, one win and one loss for voting rights publicly supported in the state. The day after the federal made the request to block lower court decision,another federal made a urgent request to get rid of a week of early voting. The panel…

    • 231 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission was a landmark case concerning the restrictions of corporate spending in elections. Citizens United is a Conservative non-profit organization that promotes its agenda by making documentaries and tv commercials. In 2008, Citizens United produced a documentary called Hillary:The Movie attempting to expose Democratic Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s past. The movie was planned to be made available on Video on Demand before the primaries in 2008. However, this went against the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA) that prohibits “electioneering communication” against “a clearly identified candidate for Federal office”.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stolen Valor Case Study

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this Supreme Court Abel Fields is found not guilty. In 2011, 39 year old Fields was convicted in California for falsely speaking of serving in the military for eight years and receiving a Purple Heart. He was in violation of the Stolen Valor act. The Stolen Valor act protects the veterans who receive a Purple Heart after being wounded in war. In his previous ruling he was found guilty.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All citizens of the United States have, at one point or another, been taught that America is a nation founded on the principles of a democratic society. Principles that, forged in the crucible of war, endow it citizens with an undeniable right to directly participate in the political process. America’s Forefathers would be profoundly disappointed, however, to learn that the unchecked influence of special interest has sullied the very fabric of United States politics. The Founding Fathers, in spite of their boundless knowledge, had not the foresight to see just how easily monetary influence would try the fortitude of their burgeoning political system. The effects of their unknowingness permeate throughout the United States government; yet still the American people are seemingly unware of – or perhaps altogether unmoved by – the astonishing amount of money being funneled into the political machine, let alone the identities of those making such remarkable donations.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of Citizens United, the Supreme Court had established that individual people and groups such as special interest groups, for example, could form committees in which they could gain an unlimited amount of money in order for them to run against a particular candidate, or political party. This is…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    . Here in the states, the topic as of late is the constitution; whether ratification of the document should happen, or whether it should not be ratified. The year is 1788 and the debate about the ratification of the U.S constitution is quite the topic among everyone including everyday citizens, in which everyone has an opinion on the topic, myself included. The U.S has the articles of confederation in place however, state delegates believed that the articles where weak, and something needed to be done to make the government stronger.…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Holder court case the justices ruled that Section four is unconstitutional and that the methods used can no longer be used to give preclearance. The majority decision, given by Chief Justice John G. Roberts points to the past skepticism about needing to update the Voting Rights Act.4 First he states the act developed have an expiration date, and that time is well passed according to the majority decision. He also discusses the tenth amendment, giving powers to the states that are not specifically given to the federal government, was part of the main argument for the majority opinion because the justices thought that this removes authority from the states, who constitutionally should be treated equally.4 Second the chief justice points multiple times to the fact that times have changed since the historic 1965 case fifty years ago.4 He describes that in 1965 this part of the Voting Rights Act made sense and had a real purpose, but section four was developed with an expiration date for the quickly changing United States. Since the United States was changing it was necessary for Congress to completely change the Voting Rights Act, but failed to change section four. Lastly the decisions leaves Congress the obligation to change section five, based on the newly developed United States and modern times which may now consist of a growing Latino population.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fighting Voter Suppression Voter suppression is a strategy to influence the outcome of an election by discouraging or preventing people from exercising the right to vote. As states keep passing voter suppression laws, our voting rights remain being attacked. Many states, California for example, make their citizens believe that after any contact with the criminal justice system means they have lost their right to vote. The whole reason for making people believe this is so people of color will stop voting since majority of the people in California’s prison are African American, Latino, or Asian American. Every voter deserves a voice.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The twenty six amendment say that the right of citizens of the United States, who are 18 of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the united states or by any state an account of age . This amendment is Important because it gave 18 year olds and people older than 18 the right to vote because if they didn’t have the right there wouldn’t be enough people to vote in elections and other voting rights that would affect the way we live today. This amendment was made in 1971 by President Richard M. Nixon the states ratified that amendment in July of that year. This amendment is still affecting the way we live today because without it the way we live would be different.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All in all, the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Tinker v. Des Moines case was entirely constitutional and, proved to be a genuine progression for modern day American…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A Supreme court considers having corporations to have a first amendment right to use an unlimited amount of money for influencing elections. The current president denounced it during a state of the union address while having many Justices present. A poll was found that it should be overturned. The outcome was viewed as outrageous but does it require amending the Constitution. It is currently the question California people will be thinking about this November when they think about Proposition 59, This Proposition asked if the state elected officials could possibly use all of the constitutional authority.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Electoral College Dilemma Premise: The U.S. Electoral College voting system needs to be improved upon because whoever earns the majority of total votes cast should be the winner. Definitions: Electoral College-…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The primary argument and deciding factor in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2008) was that Citizens United’s First Amendment rights were violated. The Supreme Court is held accountable towards upholding the constitution and upon scrutiny of all relevant rulings, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Citizens United (Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 2008). The procedure of the Supreme Court’s ruling was a series of addressing previous held court precedents, including the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, and McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 2008). Ultimately, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Citizens United in…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every four years, citizens of the United States of America choose their next president based off a unique system known as the electoral college. The way that this system works is interesting and is confused easily in the general public. In early November, when citizens go to the polls, they are not voting for the president directly, rather they are voting for their individual states to cast its electoral votes towards a certain presidential candidate. In the forty-eight of the fifty states where voting takes place, all the electoral votes go to the presidential candidate who wins the majority in their state. No matter how large or small the majority is, the presidential candidate gets all the votes.…

    • 1924 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays