Privatizing Marriage

Improved Essays
The term “marriage” can be used to refer to two different ideas: a personal commitment or legal commitment between two people, though, both meanings often coincide with one another. Characterizing marriage as a legal commitment puts the tradition of marriage in the government’s hands, allowing them to cultivate and define it. While the government appears to be working to protect marriage, it’s involvement ultimately hurts marriage’s tradition and meaning as well as gives the government unnecessary power, which is why marriage should be privatized, or moved from government to private control. Fueled by a desire of control and power, the government is grasping on to and essentially weakening marriage by claiming their role in it. The state not only distributes legal marriage contracts but encourages marriage with a variety of benefits, such as joint taxes and shared wealth. Presidents and other political figures are known to encourage marriage with their influence, as described in sociology professors Laurie Essig and Lynn Owen’s article “What If Marriage Is Bad For Us?”. The article describes President George W. Bush’s Healthy Marriage Initiative, formed to “promote marriage as a solution to poverty and for the well-being of children” (and how President Obama collected $5 million to encourage marriage in young Americans) (Essig and Owen 160). The benefits and encouragements provided by the government aren’t only unfair to those who cannot get married but damage the concept of marriage by giving it a motive other than love. In his article “On Privatizing Marriage”, Max Borders the former director of content at the Foundation for Economic Education, addresses this idea when he writes “[public, state acknowledged] marriage… is mostly about equal access to government granted privileges.” The government has tried to strengthen and encourage marriage by providing incentives, but has essentially hurt the concept of marrying for love. Another way the government hurts marriage is by defining what constitutes of a marriage and what does not. In his article “Privatize Marriage”, Cato Institute’s Executive Vice President David Boaz describes state acknowledged marriages as “a standard, one-size-fits-all formula.” The form of marriage that is widely accepted throughout the United States is a monogamous relationship between a man and a woman, which cuts out a large group of people who have alternative ideas of what a relationship can consist of, such as homosexuality and polyamory. The government’s role in defining marriage allows them to invalidate the people’s ideas, morals, and religions as well as control a large part of their culture. It’s clear that the United States is developed enough to acknowledge and support other forms of relationships, the proof being that this country is able to acknowledge a wide range of religions and beliefs. The people’s right to their individual beliefs is promised in the First Amendment …show more content…
Objectors of marriage privatization are concerned that if the government isn’t regulating marriage, there will be no authority to determine right from wrong. Currently, marriage is defined to exclude dangerous relationships such as incest and pedophilia. The concern that these acts can be part of a non-governed marriage is minor, since, outside of marriage, the United States has laws to protect the people from such wrongs. Another concern of privatizing marriage is following legal issues. Opponents claim that if the government isn’t controlling a marriage, then a case of divorce would be chaos. While this concern is rational, it isn’t too troubling. A contract can and should still be made between a couple, and while this contract would now be defined by the individual parties, it would still be enforced by the state as a legal contract. Furthermore, a popular concern about severing the government’s tie to marriage is the lives of American children. Protestors of privatization worry that if marriage isn’t being encouraged, it won’t be as common, resulting in the childhoods of the next generation being put in danger. It’s possible that marriage rates could decrease if the legal concepts of marriage changed, but this doesn’t mean that the children will suffer. In his article “On Privatizing Marriage”, Borders includes statistics relating to children in unmarried households. He cites Child Protective Services, saying that in 2007 “nearly 40 percent of… unmarried American households include children.” (Borders). This statistic not only proves that children of unmarried parents is already a common situation, but suggests that it’s already a problem that the government provides solutions for. Privatizing marriage is a debatable idea, but can be found to be healing to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “SACRED RITE OR CIVIL RIGHT?” Natural of marriage has become a hot debate in America in the past two decades. There are those who agree that same-sex couple has a right to get marriage and those who disagree with it, those who dissent believe that same-sex marriage is wrong due to the religion and the laws. Through “Sacred Rite or Civil Right?” written by Howard Moody, was published in July 5, 2004 in the issue of the nation. Moody writes this article to defense traditional marriage by using chronological organization method, present example situation, asking and answering questions, the reliable sources, use statistics, and tone.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marriage which is widely defined as the legally or formally recognized union of two people as partners in a personal relationship has been an integral part of the world. It has also been channel where individuals come together and legitimately demonstrate and show care and affection towards each other. This has made marriage a form of institution that provides the platform for people to come together for the purpose of love, goals, relationships etc. In his writing on “The Deinstitutionalization of American Marriage” Cherlin explains that marriage is an institution that defines partner’s behavior.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis In her essay, “The Disestablishment of Marriage”, Stephanie Coontz guest columnist teacher at The Evergreen State College, illustrates the change of the standards of marriage “demanding different things from marriage then in the past” with the use of studies and data. Coontz shows the data on how the present day marriage has changed from are ancestor’s views of marriage. Coontz discuss how marriage is no longer the center institution that organizes people’s lives.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A marriage is just a legally recognized union, where partners work and grow together, not where one controls another. Both authors view differently, how marriages should be run, but fail to speak about how marriage limits your…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most young adults today can relate that they would rather establish a career, pay of student loans or other debts, or buy a house before they legally bond themselves to another person. She states that marriage is symbolic and while it is still respected it is not as necessary as it once was. Traditional families like marriage still hold reverence and while it is still the ideal situation for most americans it is not necessary to provide a loving environment, and a successful…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Popenoe

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    David Popenoe and Barbara Dafoe Whitehead’s article “The State of our Unions” discusses data on marriage and divorce. It suggests that there is a cultural shift happening in America by using this information for support. In the data driven article, Popenoe and Whitehead claim that marriage rates are declining and, despite divorce rates being quite high, they are also on a steady decline. Alternatively, more people are participating in unmarried cohabitation before and in place of marriage.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, the marriage culture’s foundation of sanctity and lawfulness surpassed personal importance as society and what is acceptable has changed. The interviews of almost ten years ago are shaped around a time when marriage was changing. Both Rauch and Santorum were looking at what marriage resulted…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author wonders if marriage can be restored as the standard way of raising children. In my opinion, unless we come to grips with what is happening to parenting and marriage, there will be no substantial progress. For every child saved from poverty by a social program or otherwise, another one is entering poverty due to the continued breakdown of the typical modern family. If we could turn back the clock of marriage to 1970s, before the sharp rise in single parenthood began, the child poverty rate would much lower than it is now and fewer children will be doomed by divorce.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dr. Coontz discussed the many myths and realities of marriage, as well as the ways marriage has changed over time in her lecture “The Way We Never Were: American Families and the Nostalgia Trap.” She touched on topics such as: single parent families, step families, divorce, the stability of marriage, as well as the separate spheres for men and women. Dr. Coontz brought up many interesting facts about the history of marriage. She stated that contrary to popular belief, single-parent homes were the norm in the early 1900’s up until the 1950’s. This was due to the high rates of death as a result of war.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Changes in American Society Today, many people underestimate the value of marriage and family in America. The 21st century has seen a drastic change with new confused adding culture, language, norms, religion, persona views, experiences, different race marriage, and the environment society. To many this is a great diversity in America, and to most it is interfering with the original “American Dream”.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Traditional marriage and family, based on one man and one woman, is the foundation for a free society and has for millennia been entrusted with rearing children and instilling cultural values. We condemn the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. Windsor, which wrongly removed the ability of Congress to define marriage policy in federal law. We also condemn the Supreme Court’s lawless ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges, which in the words of the late Justice Antonin Scalia, was a “judicial Putsch” full of “silly extravagances” that reduced “the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall (Lopez). Reply 1: Every human being has a right to choose whom they love, build a life with and, be themselves with. There is nothing wrong with people believing in traditional values.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though people are not forced into opposite sex marriages, the government and the society use other methods to shape marriage into a heterosexual belief. The texts show that though marriage has become more diverse in accepting other types of relationships, the state’s interest of marriage still revolves around procreation and family purposes and because of this, it works to protect and reward those who participate in opposite sex marriages. There are also social expectations and cultural beliefs that keep heterosexual marriages sacred and necessary, as well as gender roles that are given to children at a young age, so that they grow up to become the “perfect” man or woman. Therefore, marriage is not simply about a white dress or an agreement between two people, but it is an institution, as well as a social and legal contract that regulates behaviours and reinforces normative…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Urban Poverty In America

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This can make it economically impossible for some to get married. By making steps such as this, the federal government will be promoting good family structure, rather than penalizing it. Although adult urban poverty based on family structure cannot be completely resolved, the federal and state governments can pass legislature that takes steps towards decreasing its prevalence. By promoting a strong family structure, both through the education of America’s youth as well as through it’s own actions, the government can begin to decreasing urban poverty, in more cost effective ways than those in the past, which have been mostly unsuccessful.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Ready For Marriage Apocalypse?” Carol Costello explaines that culturals attitudes toward traditional marriage are drifting away as many Americans millennial questions whether marriage is for them. As many young Americans were raised in environments of credit debt, student loans and marriage separation. In that fact the millennial generation prioritizes in their careers and travel. Many of them strongly belief staying single becomes more socially acceptable.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Same Sex Marriage

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    Marriage has always been between a man and a woman, right? Well, then what happens when you suddenly change the definition and turn it into a “loving, romantic union between committed adults?” (Vogt). It doesn’t work like that. It confuses society and children.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Superior Essays

Related Topics