Morality In The Righteous Mind By Jonathan Haidt

Superior Essays
Political polarization has always been a deeply rooted reality of American politics but it traces further back than the United States itself. Darwin proposed that morality was an adaption which evolved by natural selection both at an individual level and a group level. Morality or a strong commitment to virtue helped group cohesion and lead tribes with more virtuous members to take over other tribes which did not. In his book The Righteous Mind, Jonathan Haidt argues that group selection shaped the modern landscape as groups competed against one another for survival. The group with the most virtue prevailed. This is taken a step further by Haidt who proposes his “Hive Hypothesis”: The idea that humans can transcend self-interest in pursuit …show more content…
For example, this notorious excerpt: “Our movement rejects the view of man as an individual, standing by himself, self-centered, subject to natural law, which instinctively urges him toward a life of selfish momentary pleasure; it sees not only the individuals and generations bound together by a moral law, with common traditions and a mission which, suppressing the instinct for life closed in a brief circle of pleasure, builds up a higher life, founded on duty, a life free from the limitations of time and space, in which the individual, by self sacrifice, the renunciation of self interest… can achieve that purely spiritual existence in which his value as a man consist.” This passage, taken directly from Benito Mussolini’s “The Doctrine of Fascism” portrays a direct appeal to hive mind. Shedding one’s own selfishness for the greater good of the …show more content…
As political parties such as the GOP and DNC, and group affiliates take advantage of human nature and further divide the sections of the American electorate, an encouraged groupish behavior emerges and creates a system for perpetual propping up of the status quo. Partisan warfare according to Sean Theriault as he writes in Political Polarization in American Politics is “go[ing] beyond defeating your opponents to humiliating them, [...] beyond questioning your opponent’s judgement to questioning their motives, and go[ing] beyond fighting the good legislative fight to destroying the institution and the legislative process” (12). The proliferation of partisan warfare “serves electoral goals not legislative goals” (12), meaning that the less compromising legislators like Ted Cruz, create intentional havoc to rally their base and keep their seats. On his return from brain surgery, John McCain acknowledged this fact of partisan warfare: “We've been spinning our wheels on too many important issues because we keep trying to find a way to win without help from across the aisle.” McCain was making this point in reference to the 2017 health care reform bid and the complete stagnation of Congress to pass any type of reform. This utter lack of ability of Congress to move due to its extreme polarization can be translated into the hard data of the American electorate. As partisan warriors

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Summary Of The Big Sort

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Big Sort In the article “The Big Sort,” they talk about Americans moving to communities with like-minded people. Americans have separated themselves economically, politically, and geographically. Conservatives are living around other conservatives, and the liberals are living around other liberals. We do this because Americans like the mirror image.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Partisan polarization occurs when a government is highly divided because they have different views in politics. The American government is highly polarized because of previous events that occurred, as well as laws that have changed, allowing for a polarized government. In this essay we are going to look at how high partisan polarization affects the party in government, party organization, and the party in the electorate. Also how partisan polarization affects the three branches of government, and whether or not party polarization is a good or bad thing.…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States, our government is made up of people with different political ideologies and assertions. Our association with certain political parties is an example of our differences. Republicans and Democrats throughout history have represented the interests of their supporters rightfully. Conservatives have contrasting views upon the economy, social issues, and international policy. Liberals uphold democracy to its highest standards and support an equal political community.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, the studies Lipsitz mentions show that “minority applicants had a 60 percent greater chance of being denied than white applicants with the same credit-worthiness”, and that “loan officers more frequently used dividend income and underlying assets as criteria for judging black applicants than they did for whites”. These unfair benefits that whites receive compared to other minorities show that people are still not considered equally. Whether one is black, white, Mexican, or Asian should not be the determining factor in how one is judged. Finally, the environment people are raised in has much to do with how they view racism. When a white person is brought up in an accepting family with liberal views on race, they are more likely to accept others and treat them with fairness and respect.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Party polarization has a massive effect on voters, congress, and policymaking. Party polarization is the obvious division that exists between parties, specifically Democrats and Republicans, because of the extreme differences of the ideological beliefs of the opposing parties. Increasing party polarization causes many problems for the government. With party members determined to stand behind their own beliefs, it becomes difficult for the two parties to find common ground. The evident discord between Congress members then leads to polarization amongst voters and vice versa.…

    • 106 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Personal demands are sacrificed for the greater good, with seemingly strong reason. With weak political parties, more time is spent fighting over every last issue, which allows various factions-special interest groups- to saunter in and gain political influence, contrasting the point of the Madisonian system of democracy. This, along with weak leadership, leads to the alienation of American citizens from politics. Thus, in order to maintain American participation in politics and uphold collective responsibility, one must form a political ideology and conform to a party that aligns with those ideals. This conformism allows elected officials to get more done for the people by limiting conflict within parties and upholding party discipline.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Polarization In Congress

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In recent years, Congress has become increasingly polarized in terms of partisanship. The definition of partisan polarization is the separation of the two major parties as they move towards more severe issue positions. In other words, the members of Congress – both in the House of Representatives and in the Senate – tend to be either extremely liberal (corresponding to the Democratic party), or extremely conservative (corresponding to the Republican party). There are currently few members of the U.S. Congress that consider themselves to be moderates. Political scientists and journalists alike have speculated on why this phenomenon is occurring now, and some theories claim that this polarization is a return to the “natural” state of government,…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Title and number of the article. Reading 19: How moral are you? Who did the original study? Lawrence Kohlberg did the original study in 1927-1987…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 9 of James Rachels and Stuart Rachels The Elements of Moral Philosophy, the authors elaborate on the philosophical question, whether there are absolute moral rules. In order to illustrate the philosophical moral question, Rachels uses President Harry Truman’s dilemma on the use of atomic bombs to end World War II and in the process comes in contact with Elizabeth Anscombe, a 20th century foremost philosophical champion of the doctrine that moral rules are absolute, the theory of categorical imperative, Kant’s arguments on lying to make the case on moral judgments. First, the Rachels’ use President Harry Truman’s encounter with Elizabeth Anscombe, a 20th century foremost philosophical champion of the doctrine that…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Does moral code defines the goodness of an individual? In “A Good Man is Hard to Find”, Flannery O'Connor creates two characters that commit to different moral code in their lives. Moral code is a set of beliefs and behaviors that one agree are reasonable and live with. It affects a person's decision, action, and perception toward anything. It can be formed by the environment, religion, or culture that a person live in.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Nagel is a New York University professor and has written many things regarding the mind and moral theory. In moral luck Nagel thinks through the whole Kantian view of morality which shows that everyone is equal participants in the moral enterprise. Nagel argues that the Kantian view is too simple and doesn’t take into account the way external factors impinge upon us. Nagel brings up four different types of moral luck: constitutional luck, circumstantial luck, consequential luck which means consequences retrospectively justifies an otherwise immoral act (or fail to justify an otherwise more act), and consequential luck which the consequences affect the type or quality of blame or remorse (or moral praise). Having luck, whether it be good or bad, should impact how a person should act towards things.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Moral Theory By Rachels

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In our textbook, Rachels argues that people require humility and the understanding of where they stand in the universe. He believes that we should treat people the way they deserve to be treated and that we should hope these actions are reciprocated onto us. He believes that there are multiple strategies in finding where we are in life, such as comparing one’s life to that of other’s. We must know that we are not alone in this world and that we have an obligation in taking care of others. Rachels believes that we are rewarded for our work and self-improvement, but not our luck.…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Republican Party is moving in a more conservative direction and the Democratic Party staying consistently liberal on major issues of public policy (Jones 2001). Particularly in congress empirical research shows the parties in our government are becoming more homogenous in their political positions, while the differences among the party’s on policy issues continues to magnify (Jones 2001). In congress alone, polarization is visible by that fact that “since 1990 more than half of the congressional votes have featured a majority of one party opposing a majority of another” (Jones 2001). This intense polarization has had major effects on the relationship between congress and the president in particular. Looking at the theory of divided government it explains that legislation is less likely to get passed when the…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Political Polarization “The unanswered question of American politics in this era is whether our divided political system can function in times of stress” (Ezra Klein). Our political system is comprised of two parties with opposite views on important topics. When the representatives of these parties experience more constraint to vote towards their party 's stance on issues they are less likely to compromise and therefore get less accomplished.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Morality cannot be legislated, but behavior can be regulated. Judicial decrees may not change the heart, but they can restrain the heartless” (Martin Luther King Jr.). This quote by King describes how morality cannot ultimately be dictated by laws, but behavior can be. True morality comes from the heart and laws won’t cause someone have a morality change. Moral behavior is very often influenced by both religion and laws in the way that religion can make people think they may be punished in the afterlife for certain actions, laws, and both religion and laws have things that are prohibited that really aren’t “wrong”.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays