Political Differences Between Mesopotamian And Egyptian Pharaohs

Improved Essays
The political difference between the universal power of the Egyptian pharaohs and the Mesopotamian emperors served as the most significant factor that influenced the varying degrees of stability of ancient Egyptian and Mesopotamian society brought about by the type of ruler, along with each civilization’s religion, economics, and social structure. Mesopotamian society lacking the presence of the pharaoh led to the beliefs in violent gods who were feared instead of revered as they were in Egypt. However, in Egypt, pharaohs benefitted the people of their society through trade with other empires which resulted in riches. Both societies were patriarchal, but the Mesopotamian emperor held an iron fist over social classes that was not found in ancient Egypt’s fluid social structure. While the numerous differences between Mesopotamia and Egypt are evident, a prominent one emerged when examining the culture’s religions as well as beliefs.
Different types of rulers within each society heavily impacted and shaped Egypt and Mesopotamia’s respective religions. The Egyptian pharaoh was seen as god in human form, and therefore had to be level headed like the gods that the Egyptian people also worshiped, and built temples to both the pharaohs and gods. Mesopotamian emperors were put in place by the gods to rule the people by any means necessary in order to placate the divine powers; however, these emperors did not attract absolute respect from all members of society. People in Mesopotamia feared their gods much more than the Egyptians feared their own gods, as Mesopotamian gods were known to cause the Tigris and Euphrates rivers to flood at the slightest provocation, while Egyptian gods were venerated by the people for their collected demeanors and worshiped in order to live satisfying and long lives. It is evident that politics influenced cultural and religious aspects of society; however, it also impacted more concrete, therefore, necessary parts of daily life. Powerful empires based on trade had the option to grow and expand their influence through other nations, just as Egypt and Mesopotamia did with neighboring countries. Much of Egyptian trade was the exchange of valuables such as metals, semi-precious stones, ivory, along with leopard skins and ostrich feathers to give to the pharaoh or used to decorate the lavish pharaoh’s tombs. A very practical trade, Mesopotamians traded throughout Anatolia in order to gain leather, wood, metal, as well as luxuries including semi-precious stones and ivory that all belonged to the merchants. While Egyptians brought back lavish items for their pharaoh, Mesopotamians traded for sturdy materials, with the exception of some valuables that remained the possession of the trading family instead of the
…show more content…
Across the globe, political power created fiercely strong religious beliefs that are most notably at the core of centuries-old warring throughout the Middle East. Forms of government, whether democracy or monarchy, have led nations around the world into debt due to the ruler’s idea of economy. The rise of a dictator in the last century whose power and destruction spread across Europe defined a social class system in which Jews as well as certain other ethnic groups were eradicated as they were deemed the lowest of the low. Political power throughout the ages has defined both ancient and modern societies, and will no doubt continue to impact future

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    What are some similarities and differences between two pharaohs? In this paragraph I will tell you some similarities and differences between two pharaohs called Hatshepsut and Ramses II. Both Pharaohs had similar things in common. For example, Hatshepsut had a spouse and Ramses II also had a spouse. However, they differed in this because Hatshepsut had one spouse and Ramses II had more than one spouse.…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Egypt, at the top of the social standing was the pharaoh, who was looked at as a leader and considered a god. In Mesopotamia, the king was at the top, who is looked at as a leader as well. Next in Egypt were the high priests and priestesses who served the leaders, and similarly in Mesopotamia, the governors took care of the kingdom’s territories. Another step down in Egypt were the nobles, who fought the pharaoh’s wars. Next in the Egypt organization were merchants, scribes, and artisans, who made items to be traded, and in Mesopotamia, the next level down was the aristocracy, who were priests and traders as well.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ability to convince one’s subjects that a ruler was truly in control of every aspect of their lives, in a way more meaningful than crops and trade, but aspects like fertility, life, and death was ultimately what justified the differences between commoners and elites, the basis of rulership. These ideas are linked to the religious political aspects of these states which were one in the same for these societies. Economic aspects were also important in a literal sense, for if a ruler cannot sustain their subjects they cannot be justified, but as seen in the Ubaid and more so in the Olmec, religion is truly what allowed rulers to gain the power necessary to construct the states studied today. The importance of economic functions within the Ubaid and Olmec are both essential to rulership because they sustain the population, but also work to procure valuable items and materials…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Egypt and Mesopotamia shared practices, ideas, qualities, and characteristics. An example of this is they both had the same belief in many gods. The belief of gods they had was Polytheism. Another thing they had the same was their writing systems.…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mesopotamian Civilization

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In terms of the ruling leadership Mesopotamian cities were ruled by a leader or "Great One" who was chosen by the priests and imposed a dynastic rule (Sivers, Desnoyers, and Stow 41). In contrast, Egypt was originally ruled by Kings who controlled the various cities in Egypt, however once egypt was unified a single king ruled the empire (Sivers, Desnoyers, and Stow 44). Both the Mesopotamian and Egyptian leaders claimed their divinity, although the Egyptian king claimed to be a living God. To conclude, Mesopotamia and Egypt are similar in the sense that both were broken up into small cities with their own ruler, however Egypt was eventually unified. Both civilizations were also run similarly by several Kings who imposed a dynastic rule and consider themselves divine, although Egypt was eventually ruled by a single…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ancient Egypt Thousands of years ago, the ancient Egyptians went about their normal lives. And they, like many people today, had a religion they practiced. But how did their religion play a part in culture? Their Religion……

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pharaohs in culture were believed to be semi-divine beings who represented Gods while they were on Earth. Chosen by the Gods, Pharaohs were given the right to rule. This honor is what led many of them to become successful rulers, besides the one case of the biblical Pharaoh. Mesopotamian rulers, while also being chosen by Gods, did not treat their appointment as seriously as the Egyptians did. Based off of Hammurabi’s Code and the “Epic of Gilgamesh”, we can concluded that many, if not all Mesopotamian rulers were harsh rulers.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because Egypt was the “gift of the Nile” and generally prosperous and harmonious, Egyptian gods tended to reflect a positive religion with an emphasis on a positive afterlife. This would only change late in the New Kingdom as the fortunes of Egypt changed. The most popular god, Osiris, was also the law giver as well as the custodian of the world of the dead. In contrast, Mesopotamian religion was bleak and gloomy.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These offerings exhibits the amount of devotion and dedication subjects gave to their absolute rulers and God. In Mesopotamian culture, it is emphasized that humans are servants to their God and do everything to satisfy and comply to God’s commands and wishes. They are constantly devoting themselves to their rulers and the divine. In Egyptian culture and religion, the nation leader, the Pharaoh was seen as a living god and linked humanity to the rest of the gods. Similar to Mesopotamian culture, the people owed the gods and their Pharoah their most upmost respect…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is an abundance of similarities and differences between ancient Egypt and ancient Mesopotamia. I have found that the areas with the most material to compare and contrast are in the topics of social and political patterns. In this essay I will explain differences and similarities of the two civilizations. In this essay I will discuss writing and government systems. Both civilizations used a system of writing.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Civilization never stands still; if in one country it is falling back, in another it is changing, evolving, [and] becoming more complicated” – Arthur Keith. This is the case of Ancient Egypt and the Roman Empire, two magnificent civilizations wrapped in a twisted fate. It was when the Roman Republic defeated Egypt’s army that it became a prosperous empire. Even though Ancient Egypt existed thousands of years before the start of the Roman Empire, both civilizations strikingly shared common social aspects in society. In addition to similarities, major differences were also seen in daily life.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Egypt’s government was under control of one, pharaoh, Mesopotamian’s government was divided among several city – states. Elite culture in Egypt, developing in a more stable, predictable and beneficial environment, produce a rather more cheerful and hopeful outlook on the world. (Strayer 2011, 80) The Mesopotamian outlook on life was unpredictable and often violent environment. The Mesopotamian believed that their deities were cruel, punishing them with droughts and floods.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Egyptians were very similar, yet very different from the Mesopotamians. They viewed their lives optimistically and experienced great advantages from the Nile River. Egyptians were very unique when it came to making art, they had an elegant style and exquisite architecture skills that enhanced many works of art that to this very day can never be replaced or forgotten. They strongly believed in the afterlife as well, but their view on this afterlife was different from others for they believed it was just a continuation of the life they had already known and that it would only be greater and more prosperous, while others like the Mesopotamians believed it was sort of an escape from…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both civilizations made advances in sciences, specifically math and astronomy. The Egyptians developed the clock, and the calendar, while the Mesopotamians. They also had social classes, with the priests and landowners at the top, and peasants and slaves at the bottom. Mesopotamia and Egypt, though geographically in different areas, had many similarities in their way of…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Sumerians were ruled under a Theocracy which is when a priest portrays to be the god. Around 2100 BCE dynasties arose under the rule of Sargon I. Saron was the leader of Mesopotamia and the Sumerians. In summary, The Egyptians and Sumerians shared characteristics along with some noticeable differences. Both of these great civilizations had similarities in their religion and location, specific development in their political aspect, along with who their leaders were. The Egyptians and Sumerians are both polytheistic, established near rivers and ruled by some type of god.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays