The inclusion of a story within a story emphasizes the indeterminacy and complexity of life by acknowledging the multilayered nature of experience and reality. The storyteller is unable to remember the name of a “sorta famous puppet,” which again emphasizes the limitations of language while reinforcing the claim about the transience of reality and experiences. However, the fact that the character’s story is not impeded by the absence of this factual information implies that such information may not actually be all that important. Miguel’s story continually states and then undermines what is important, supporting the idea that the interpreter determines what is significant through the process of
The inclusion of a story within a story emphasizes the indeterminacy and complexity of life by acknowledging the multilayered nature of experience and reality. The storyteller is unable to remember the name of a “sorta famous puppet,” which again emphasizes the limitations of language while reinforcing the claim about the transience of reality and experiences. However, the fact that the character’s story is not impeded by the absence of this factual information implies that such information may not actually be all that important. Miguel’s story continually states and then undermines what is important, supporting the idea that the interpreter determines what is significant through the process of