“The first reason is the presence of Cahokian settlers, colonist and migrants between about A.D 1050 and 1200”(Timothy R. Pauketat. Cahokia. 155). Secondly, it appears that there are ear ornaments, pots, material objects and smoking pipes in places as far as the Spiro Mounds in Oklahoma (see map). Before it was believed that Cahokians might have given smoking pipes and ear ornaments to their political affiliations as gifts. My third reason is that there is evidence of violence in Midwestern places more so than in domestic groups. This may have been unlike the pre-Mississippian-style, and it was also unlike the large-scale village raiding seen in the Upper Midwest after A.D. 1200, when Pax Cahokiana presumably disappeared (Pauketat, Caho. 156). For that specific reason I believe that Cahokians and that their allied communities maintained peace and order in the Upper Mississippi Valley through planned force against groups that did not obey rules in their …show more content…
Pauketat’s view of Cahokia’s remembrance rests upon his knowledge and understanding of Cahokia as a city that had the potential of enforcing political power as well as military power across the plains and woodlands. My understanding is that Cahokians continued a “Pax Cahokiana”, and without the city’s enforcement of military power, the plains and woodlands started acting violent and became rebellious (Pauketat, Caho.168). The next Woodland Indians generation drew upon a Cahokian cultural legacy and because of that the city “also affected the shape and direction of European colonization and, later, America’s westward expansion” (Pauketat, Caho. 38-39). According to the author, Cahokia’s most famous act was in its collapse and he sees the city as “pre-Columbian America’s experiment in civilization” (Pauketat,