The Christian understanding of the relationship to the Creator, comes from a self-revelation of a Trinitarian God through the Word, narrating the whole history of Israel and the birth, life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, basic stone in the search of Truth within the
Church, through the guidance of the Holy Spirit. Albert Einstein wrote: “Science without religion is lame and religion without science is blind.” (Uršič). The human quest for meaning and purpose requires an interaction between faith and reason, which originally have proceeded on the same journey as complementary to one another; the university system as we know it and the systematic discipline of natural science, are born within Christianity.
The Enlightenment with its …show more content…
Pannenberg also considered and demonstrated “the inadequacy of explanations in the natural sciences” (Clayton 237-240) opening a path, from within the sciences themselves, to dialogue with theology. He revealed how scientific theories “inevitably raise for humans the questions of meaning that then become the focus of the social sciences and hermeneutics.” (Clayton 237-240). One of Pannenberg’s mistake was to keep the attempted dialogue on the abstract realm, missing to update it with data from Physics and biological …show more content…
Both are characterized, precisely by the genetic relationship of the second with respect to the first, from a linear conception of time, extraneous to the mythical world as well as to the Greco-Roman one, would be inaugurated by the peculiar temporal experience of the Jewish people, experience that would remain in Christianity, permeating the whole of European history, afterwards, the fall of the Roman
Church, through the guidance of the Holy Spirit. Albert Einstein wrote: “Science without religion is lame and religion without science is blind.” (Uršič). The human quest for meaning and purpose requires an interaction between faith and reason, which originally have proceeded on the same journey as complementary to one another; the university system as we know it and the systematic discipline of natural science, are born within Christianity.
The Enlightenment with its …show more content…
Pannenberg also considered and demonstrated “the inadequacy of explanations in the natural sciences” (Clayton 237-240) opening a path, from within the sciences themselves, to dialogue with theology. He revealed how scientific theories “inevitably raise for humans the questions of meaning that then become the focus of the social sciences and hermeneutics.” (Clayton 237-240). One of Pannenberg’s mistake was to keep the attempted dialogue on the abstract realm, missing to update it with data from Physics and biological …show more content…
Both are characterized, precisely by the genetic relationship of the second with respect to the first, from a linear conception of time, extraneous to the mythical world as well as to the Greco-Roman one, would be inaugurated by the peculiar temporal experience of the Jewish people, experience that would remain in Christianity, permeating the whole of European history, afterwards, the fall of the Roman