Brown’s case of was interesting because it allowed people of different ethnicities to be able to go to school with one another and have the same level of education that the “white” people had. It stated that separated school buildings are unconstitutional because the segregated schools were unequal. This ruling has brought us to today’s societies ideals of education and how everyone deserves the right to a free education. Some of the information that I have learned in class to be of interest is the Obergefell V Hodges case. I had already known, prior to the class, about the case and the outcome of it. However, I had not listened into the case to see how the Justices and lawyer spoke to one another. I like being able to hear the debate go on and listen in to what is being said by the Lawyers and see how they can think on their feet. One of the things that I am interested in learning about is the interpretation of law, mainly by the Supreme Court, and how they are able to decide on a case based off of a different ruling made years ago. Especially when the case that they are making their interpretation off of is completely different than what they are looking at. I want to be able to know how each Justice votes and their reasoning behind it, even if it might be biased based on their party
Brown’s case of was interesting because it allowed people of different ethnicities to be able to go to school with one another and have the same level of education that the “white” people had. It stated that separated school buildings are unconstitutional because the segregated schools were unequal. This ruling has brought us to today’s societies ideals of education and how everyone deserves the right to a free education. Some of the information that I have learned in class to be of interest is the Obergefell V Hodges case. I had already known, prior to the class, about the case and the outcome of it. However, I had not listened into the case to see how the Justices and lawyer spoke to one another. I like being able to hear the debate go on and listen in to what is being said by the Lawyers and see how they can think on their feet. One of the things that I am interested in learning about is the interpretation of law, mainly by the Supreme Court, and how they are able to decide on a case based off of a different ruling made years ago. Especially when the case that they are making their interpretation off of is completely different than what they are looking at. I want to be able to know how each Justice votes and their reasoning behind it, even if it might be biased based on their party